Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is hilarious. OLED for a monitor? Are you a compositor or someone working in pitch black? Sure, OLED has perfect black levels but there is a reason why Sony is going RGB Mini LED and their reference monitor is LCD and not OLED.

OLED is flawed tech and will be for a while. Once we get MicroLED to an affordable level we will leave OLED in the past.
And yet, Apple already replaced iPad Prow with Tandem OLED and now, with MBP. Tandem OLED is not a regular OLED and it is meant for a long term uses such as vehicle.
 
For those of you saying OLED sucks, then tell me alternative solutions and truth be told, there are none. LCD is outdated without imrproving and mini-LED still LCD based and has its own limitations while micro-LED is quite impossible. But Tandem OLED is the best tech available for high-end displays unless you wanna spend $10,000~50,000 on reference monitors with dual LCD.
 
Why do you assume they won't?



This is nonsense. OLED is actually pretty bad for office displays, where content is mostly static. MiniLED also gets way brighter and lasts far longer.



Why does it "need" an inferior input standard that the previous generation doesn't even have? USB-C is better is literally every way.



...is this sarcasm?
Apple literally does not allow trade ins for the studio display, buddy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V.K.
And just with the last sentence you answered why LCD is not outdated :-D :-D :-D

OLED is flawed tech as i mentioned earlier. Read my previous post.

Sure OLED has its uses etc. but not for office/work screen. Hence why reference monitor exists with LCD and not OLED and why most movies are calibrated on those LCD reference monitors.



For those of you saying OLED sucks, then tell me alternative solutions and truth be told, there are none. LCD is outdated without imrproving and mini-LED still LCD based and has its own limitations while micro-LED is quite impossible. But Tandem OLED is the best tech available for high-end displays unless you wanna spend $10,000~50,000 on reference monitors with dual LCD.
 
For those of you saying OLED sucks, then tell me alternative solutions and truth be told, there are none. LCD is outdated without imrproving and mini-LED still LCD based and has its own limitations while micro-LED is quite impossible. But Tandem OLED is the best tech available for high-end displays unless you wanna spend $10,000~50,000 on reference monitors with dual LCD.

Micro LED TV's were showcased at CES this year.. so no it is not impossible. Also OLED burns in no matter the tech, even Apples displays do if you left a static image on for several hours a day, so OLED has traditionally been utterly useless for the working environment, even some Pro's have had burn in from tool bars in apps they use every day.

So we await to see how much better the Tandem OLED tech is at reducing burn in, it SHOULD help a lot. OLED is vastly superior at motion, for TV's, and of course contrast levels.

By the way folks, you do know you CAN buy an OLED reference monitor for circa 30K right? They have BOTH LCD and OLED tech available at that end of the market.
 
Im guessing its the same 5k Mini LED that has been showing up at CES from LG and other brands. BIG IF is if there is a 32" model. Not sure if anything at CES matches that exactly.



lg-27gm950b-thoughts-27-5k-miniled-ai-v0-jtf7azgj7fbg1.jpg
Yours is a very plausible theory, as the last time that LG made a high-res LCD display, it was simply a rebranded display they originally engineered for the Mac.

 
Predictions: miniLED, 120HZ, no Thunderbolt 5, more expensive than the already overpriced current model. Studio Display 1 will be discontinued.

It's weird that Apple runs from affordable to obscenely expensive on all its other product lines - desktops, laptops, phones, tablets - but draws the line at monitors. Current-gen Studio Display should stick around at $899, Studio Display 2 should keep the $1599, and the XDR Display should come down in price. Ideally they'd add a curved or ultra-wide model, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdawgnoonan
I am actually considering studio display today. Not in for gaming, only restoration old scanned dias & negatives. Imovie edit. Going for m4 mini. Upgrading from M1 imac. Hard to continue waiting.
Just wait especially since you currently have an M1 iMac. The current Studio Display is just bigger screen size, no real upgraded features. Also an M5 mini should be around the corner so just try to wait it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mac1984 and ultradk
Whatever technology Apple will use for the new Apple Studio Display - it will be very interesting, if the fans of the new Studio Display will stop running while the Mac mini is in sleep mode, like they used to do before macOS 15.4

Maybe they are not going to fix this bug in macOS, maybe the new ASD will have a external power supply, so there is no need for fans.
 
And just with the last sentence you answered why LCD is not outdated :-D :-D :-D

OLED is flawed tech as i mentioned earlier. Read my previous post.

Sure OLED has its uses etc. but not for office/work screen. Hence why reference monitor exists with LCD and not OLED and why most movies are calibrated on those LCD reference monitors.
They are using dual LCD cause OLED wasn't even available at that time. Besides, it consumes a lot of power and heat.
 
Micro LED TV's were showcased at CES this year.. so no it is not impossible. Also OLED burns in no matter the tech, even Apples displays do if you left a static image on for several hours a day, so OLED has traditionally been utterly useless for the working environment, even some Pro's have had burn in from tool bars in apps they use every day.

So we await to see how much better the Tandem OLED tech is at reducing burn in, it SHOULD help a lot. OLED is vastly superior at motion, for TV's, and of course contrast levels.

By the way folks, you do know you CAN buy an OLED reference monitor for circa 30K right? They have BOTH LCD and OLED tech available at that end of the market.
We are talking about computer monitors, not TV which is totally different.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Non-Euclidean
I'm just hoping for a 32" display that isn't $5-7k. What about $2.5k Apple? Is that enough profit margins for you? If not, then I guess the LG is the one I'll get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V.K. and jayb3
Im guessing its the same 5k Mini LED that has been showing up at CES from LG and other brands. BIG IF is if there is a 32" model. Not sure if anything at CES matches that exactly.



lg-27gm950b-thoughts-27-5k-miniled-ai-v0-jtf7azgj7fbg1.jpg

If this is the panel they go with, I’m sure Apple will software lock the dual mode and cap frame rate when connected to a non-Apple device.

I would love to have one display for my Mac and gaming PC and being able to switch through with one simple TB cable. Instead, I have an ASD and an LG Gaming Monitor side by side. Looks hideous but what can we do…
 
Makes sense that Apple would adopt the same LG mini-LED panel as the 27GM950B for the Studio Display since their 5K displays have all been sourced from LG. There are evidently one or two more 5K Mini-LED panels with the same ~2300 zones, so Apple has options.

With MSRP of these 5K Mini-LED displays expected to be around $1000, Apple should be able to keep the new Studio Display at the same $1599 price.

As for the Pro Display XDR, LG did announce a 32 inch tandem OLED, however it is 4K so non-retina [LG 32GX870B]. And nobody showed a 6K OLED or Mini-LED display so if there is a new Pro Display XDR, it will be using a custom panel like the original and therefore is going to be as equally as expensive.
This time it will be $1000 for the LG display, and $600 for the Apple tax.

Apple sure knows how to bleed their customers dry.
 
Why does it "need" an inferior input standard that the previous generation doesn't even have? USB-C is better is literally every way.
Can we stop with the hyperbole comments please? In what way is HDMI an inferior input standard? Macs have HDMI ports, I think Apple's monitors should have an input that matches their own computers for goodness sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WLSON
For those of you saying OLED sucks, then tell me alternative solutions and truth be told, there are none. LCD is outdated without imrproving and mini-LED still LCD based and has its own limitations while micro-LED is quite impossible. But Tandem OLED is the best tech available for high-end displays unless you wanna spend $10,000~50,000 on reference monitors with dual LCD.
Unless you are talking about a tandem OLED with an RGB stripe sub-pixel layout (like Apple specified for the iPad Pro) then text fringing is a problem in larger displays. Currently there is only one WOLED panel like this announced from LG Display, a 27" 4K, and ASUS is working with them to bring it to market. Just announced at CES, but still in development.

Samsung Display has also adopted this RGB stripe sub-pixel layout (Samsung is calling it "RGB OLED") for the 5th generation of QD-OLED, so all of its 2026 models in this generation will have it. However, as of today, there are no 27" 5K or 32" 6K/8K OLED panels at all. So unless Apple has designed its own 5K+ panels, then no, there is zero chance the Studio Display 2 will be OLED.

As others have already mentioned, the big news at CES was the arrival of "RGB MiniLED" (which LG is marketing as "Micro RGB" and which should not be confused with MicroLED). This is the alternative, interim solution, and the world's first monitor to use it, the HKC M10 Ultra, a 32" 4K, was in the show and will launch later this year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: V.K. and TechnoMonk
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.