No, they're right, Apple needs to put a more powerful cpu in there.
If one doesn't really know exactly what it does one can't qualify what CPU should be in it.
No, they're right, Apple needs to put a more powerful cpu in there.
No, they're right, Apple needs to put a more powerful cpu in there.
There is no iTouch. This the general public inventing an i-name.Same here. Apple really needs to get away from its i[name] system. iPod, iPhone, iTouch, iMac.... It gets old and displays a lack of creativity, which is not what Apple is known for. (in general)
Except naturally that it was not beige at time when all other computers were beige (ok, there was the blue white Powermac G3 which preceded the iMac a little bit).exactly. those guys can brand anything, i mean when that silly little beige imac first came out they got jeff goldblum to sell it.
He might have said exactly the same thing if he didn't have any inside knowledge of an Apple tablet -- because of all the Apple tablet rumors.
Sure but how can one blame Apple for using the 'i' moniker too much if they aren't actually the one using it?That may be, but in my experience most non-tech people refer to it as the "iTouch". I think it's because most people use them for so many things other than just music that they don't think of it as an iPod (and it also lacks the wheel).
There are exactly three names for devices that start with i: iMac, iPod, iPhone
Compare that to Macbook (Pro), Mac Pro, Airport (Express/Extreme), Time Capsule, AppleTV
I think it should be called after it's predecessor. The Newton II.
Wouldn't Newton's successor be Einstein?
Einstein didn't use Apple's though, did he?![]()
Same here. Apple really needs to get away from its i[name] system. iPod, iPhone, iTouch, iMac.... It gets old and displays a lack of creativity, which is not what Apple is known for. (in general)
Calling it "iTouch" would be the most appropriate.
And can we please stop confusing "iPod touch" and "iTouch"?
Apple does not currently have a product called "iTouch".
That would be too confusing having an iTouch and a iPod Touch. I'm still thinking the name will be either iPod Tablet, iTablet or possibly iPod Slate. I don't think it will simply be the Slate.
Well if it was an unintentional leak Jobs is probably throwing a hissy fit of epic proportions and chewing carpet in Infinite Loop.
He'll probably just trash the whole project now…
And the NY Times is definitely off his Christmas card list.
![]()
The why didn't he say "tablet" then? This guy took a largely unused word for this device and used it with some authority, as if he knew what it was called. If he is working with Apple on content for such a device, Apple would most certainly have used some kind of name for it (and not Q473) and its form factor. We've all been using "tablet" for years.. but here comes "slate". It reeks correct terminology long way.
It's my opinion that using another name for this device brings some credibility to this rumor. If he'd used "tablet" instead, I would have been more sceptical.
Slate would be a great name for such a device. After the oh-so-lame moniker "iPhone," Apple needs something more distinctive for its next device. The "iGadget" meme is growing tiresome.
If they name this thing (if it exists) the iTablet, I'll puke.