Or: AirPods are such a near perfect product so I don't need to upgrade at all! At least, that's the case for me most likely.
That’s the case for you most likely? You have no idea what features will compel you to get the new pair Lol.
Or: AirPods are such a near perfect product so I don't need to upgrade at all! At least, that's the case for me most likely.
That’s the case for you most likely? You have no idea what features will compel you to get the new pair Lol.
Why on earth would you want health monitoring features in airpods? That's what the Apple Watch is for. Spare the health features and stick to other improvements. I fully expect to hear about a new Apple Pencil with "health monitoring features" next year now...
No they didn't, but keep telling yourself yourself that. The iPhone 7 is also not a comparable phone to the X.They nearly doubled it from the 7 to the X... so ...
Hopefully don’t screw up a great product. Knowing my temperature From AirPods isn’t changing the health industry or mankind.Airpods is one product which needs no changing at all feature and functionality wise. The health monitoring and water resistance is nice and all... but I really don't want to pay extra for all of that. Just give me increased battery life, and I am a happy camper. After 1.5 years, I still get excellent battery life. And I use them a LOT on a daily basis.
Innovation takes place inside under the plastic. At a minimum know these will have wireless charging and improved BT connectivity.O, the innovation!
Erm, they already can. Maybe not officially, but it’s widely documented that they can. “Splashes of water and rain”? How about a 30-minute wash cycle and then 5 minutes under a foot of water (during which they played)?Apple is also said working on third-generation AirPods that are set to be released in 2020 with a new design and perhaps improved water resistance that will allow the AirPods to hold up to "splashes of water and rain."
The AirPods aren't likely to be entirely water resistant, however, and won't be able to be submerged in liquid.
Which would increase them to the same price as many other higher end BT buds without the W chip.Starting at $299.
I'm interested in the "health monitoring features". What could they possibly monitor from your ear? Your ear wax quality?
$0.20/day.I'd be a little leery about the prospect of having to spend $150+ every 2 years on disposable headphones.
Personally, I don't understand the appeal... but then again I've never tried them. I've heard that the sound quality is mediocre, and while I get that the device switching is convenient. Seems weird to walk around with those things in completely shutting out the world not being aware of surroundings. I have a pair of Aftershokz Titaniums, and I love them. The sound quality is still mediocre, but I can wirelessly listen and still be aware of surroundings. It's great for cycling, driving, doing stuff around the house, not getting attacked in a parking lot, etc.Innovation takes place inside under the plastic. At a minimum know these will have wireless charging and improved BT connectivity.
That’s reasonable progress for what was already a nearly flawless execution.
That's another reason for price increase right there, an improved Apple product deserves a price increase.
$0.20/day.
Worth it.
Why on earth would you want health monitoring features in airpods? That's what the Apple Watch is for. Spare the health features and stick to other improvements. I fully expect to hear about a new Apple Pencil with "health monitoring features" next year now...
DigiTimes is notoriously unreliable, but this report is nonetheless interesting: what if you could use the ear as a second lead for the EKG?
So weren't been paying attention to Apple products for several years now. Too bad only this year people start noticing and some still didn't notice until now.No. Technology in general is improving all the time and prices tend to stay pretty much the same with the earlier stuff getting cheaper.
So weren't been paying attention to Apple products for several years now. Too bad only this year people start noticing and some still didn't notice until now.
Didn’t even know they were not supposed to be water resistant. Fell into the pool with them once last year and they r still working fine.
The left one however broke once before that happened and Apple was so cheap to only replace the broken one so now my left one holds battery almost 20% longer than the right one. Quite annoying
No they didn't, but keep telling yourself yourself that. The iPhone 7 is also not a comparable phone to the X.
You can compare the $769 iPhone 7 Plus to the $999 X, which is a 30% increase. The Xr is $749, so it's $10 actually less expensive than the 7 Plus and has a bigger screen, FaceID, more storage, etc.
iPhone 7 32GB - $649
iPhone 7 Plus 32GB - $769
iPhone Xr (the Phone that is actually comparable to the iPhone 7) - $749
iPhone X $999
Would love to see how you calc a 100% price increase.
No thanks, I don’t want to carry an extra charge pad when I travel. My iPhone charger and it’s cable is all I need.All I want is wireless charging. Then I can ditch the lightning cable for good.