What would be the reason behind pumping out new and improved technologies, such as Penryn, only to phase them out within a year? Understandable if Intel wants to get rid of the old ones and replace em with new ones, then Apple will be right behind that. But these "Pro" updates are "POOR" at the least, what ever happened to the G5 laptop? I'm still using a 12" PowerBook and love it, but it is only 1.5GHz, these Pro updates only raised L2 cache(on some machines), and a processor boost of 0.4GHz at most(LED backlit, no remote, multi-touch trackpad[I want to touch my screen!!], base models brought up RAM/ROM). Mainly, I don't see justification in these updates, simply Intel wanting to phase out a chip is fine, but if Apple keeps releasing new notebooks every time Intel's got something new, when will it even out and, when should someone be able to buy a MacBook(Pro) without having it as well phased out and replaced by another?
You really have no conception of the Intel/AMD world do you? Or the world outside of Apple might be a better way to put it. I come from the PC world. What I HATE most about Apple is that they are so SLOW about putting out hardware updates. It's NOT about YOU feeling good about YOUR purchase, but about having CHOICES and to get the latest hardware when you actually NEED or WANT it. That's the difference. I don't care if you feel ripped off that a newer/faster laptop comes out 4 months later. I don't want to have to buy OLD technology when I DO need it just so you can feel better about your purchase 6 months earlier! (i.e. the iPhone crying-fest all over again). I'm glad Apple is finally starting to come around a bit (even if being forced to by Intel). I'd rather KNOW an update is coming than play guessing games about when I might get the next new thing that I KNOW is about to come out (like the next Intel CPU update).
Just knowing I only have to wait until June to get an improved FSB means I may just hold out a little longer to get that MBP and work on my whole house audio system instead (plan to use my old PowerMac dual 553 with a Sata card I just ordered driving big storage and an iPod Touch and Remote Buddy to control either an airport express + AppleTV or two airport expresses... I just wish they had an 802.11n airport express since the bridge extender mode is nice and I don't want to slow my wireless network down for legacy devices that are attached all the time. At least the iPod Touch would only connect when turned on).
I really wish they would offer another case for the MBP either way, though. I want a mag-latch and frankly, I'd prefer a polycarbonate shell over aluminum that can scratch and dent easily. I agree with another thread where I'd rather see a slightly thicker laptop than have the drive slot compromised by being too thin at the bottom. I held off buying one last December soley because of the keyboard issue I read whereby so many MBS weren't registering keypresses (at least the first one). I'm STILL not convinced the keyboard on it is reliable since many have more problems than just the first keypress. There is NO excuse for a $2000+ laptop having a cheap/crap keyboard, IMO. It's STILL using that keyboard so maybe it'll be changed in June. At the very least it'll have a faster side bus.
Of course, if they just had a decent graphics card in the regular Macbook, I'd get one of those instead. It'd be nice if instead of two separate lines, you could just configure the shell/internals the way you want them (i.e. pick a black MB shell/keyboard with MBP internals and ports.)
I already passed up buying a new Mac desktop in favor of another PC in November because the iMac updates sucked (slower than previous ones!) and the MacPro at the time had a CRAP video card (7300GT) for the price point ($2300+ for a 7300GT system is ludicrous). I got sick of waiting (figures the MacPro would finally get a decent GPU option a couple of months later) and just bought an interim $700 PC I put together myself which will eventually be put in an arcade cabinet setup for a Mame system down the road. For $700, I got a 5600+ (2.8GHz Athlon64), 2Gigs of 800MHz DDR2, Nvidia 7900GS, 24x DVD-RW with lightscribe, 320Gig 7200RPM sata drive and Gigabit ethernet running XP. It can play any current game out there plus run all my old Windows software and latest browsers at smoking speeds, etc. But look at what my choices were in the $700 range from Apple.... 1.83Ghz Intel Core2 Duo with Intel GMA 950 crap-o-graphics, 80Gig Sata Drive and 667MHz ram with a COMBO drive (no DVD-RW in 2008!?? WTF!?). I hate to say it, but Apple is STILL shooting themselves in the foot for potential switcher sales. I'm already sold on the superiority of MacOSX over Windows, but I'm not buying CRAP hardware like Intel GMA 950 just to run OSX. And the iMacs are running laptop hardware. Apple NEEDS a true desktop system below their "Pro" level if they REALLY want to get serious about attracting large numbers of switchers from the PC world. Having the option to run Windows on the same machine is a great start, but they seriously need to start offering competitive MAINSTREAM hardware (iMac type setup is NOT a mainstream setup in the PC world and frankly, I don't like something that puts expansion on my desk instead of UNDER it in the case). Yes, I know some of you Apple fanboys think iMacs are the best thing since sliced bread, but I don't like it and I don't like having to buy some insanely expensive $2300-2700+ MacPro just to get a decent GPU on a desktop).
I'll buy the MBP laptop because I want to set up a portable music studio (i.e. LogicPro8) in the future and laptops with good GPUs aren't cheap to begin with (unlike desktops). So their laptop lines are a little more reasonable. But the desktop situation needs corrected, IMO. Something decent in the $1200-1500 range makes sense given what I got for a mere $700 or so above even with Apple taking more profit than a PC.