Marco Arment got bit by Business Insider as well.
I went to his site and can see why. It can be a case study in how to write something that can be quoted out of context.
Marco Arment got bit by Business Insider as well.
I think what's funny was that it seemed like an episode of Big Bang Theory. Nilay came off looking like one of the over excited nerds. These are the wrong people for Apple to get for this product. It was like watching a geek argue how bad the recent star trek movies were because of nerd crap when normal people loved them.
It's supposedly fashion yet you got unfashionable reviewers initially? These aren't the people who will lead a fashion trend.
If the nerd isn't excited, then how does this leave a good impression? The normal CNBC folks looked more excited.
Every review I read outside of The Verge read to me like the reviewer was either paid by Apple and/or fearful that they would lose the opportunity to review future Apple products. These reviews read something like "X isn't perfect and could be better, but, but, Y and Z are awesome." Every criticism was downplayed and/or was immediately followed with a series of positive comments.
Many years ago, I wrote reviews for computer magazines, and we were always instructed to do exactly this to avoid upsetting advertisers.
I give Nilay Patel credit for not kissing Apple's butt over a product that obviously needs work.
I think it's irresponsible to believe that Apple can produce hit after hit especially one in a Tim Cook era. It was bound to happen. Just look at Windows Vista and Windows 8. It just happens. Everybody that rises to the top eventually fall.
Apple just has to listen to the criticism and react quickly to make product better. It will be dangerous for them to believe that this watch is perfect.
http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369656
I felt like the news anchors really didn't take Nilay Patel's arguments seriously and a lot of disrespect IMO.
And I thought The Verge offered a dumbed-down approach to technology reporting. When I think Verge I think hipsters with beards that talk about how bright the screen is and how they can definitely feel the difference in weight between the new and old models, wooooow.
And then this show? To be fair, the anchors don't seem to know jack about technology anyway so I can forgive them for making endless misstatements about the hardware but wow oh wow do they have to dumb down technology to their viewers. Unbelievable. It makes Verge look nerdy.
So he now admit that his site review is **** and inconsistent?
Didn't many here proclaim that The Verge review is always good and balanced we should listen to this guy? Sound to me like Mr. Patel himself didn't get memo from our forum members.
If you unexpectedly fall asleep with the watch on, spend the night at someones house without the cable or you forget to charge your basically screwed. Sure you can bring along the usb charging cable in your mad rush out the door but the watch takes hours to charge up basically leaving you without a watch for half the day. Apple hasn't figured out fast charging yet.
Every review I read outside of The Verge read to me like the reviewer was either paid by Apple and/or fearful that they would lose the opportunity to review future Apple products. These reviews read something like "X isn't perfect and could be better, but, but, Y and Z are awesome." Every criticism was downplayed and/or was immediately followed with a series of positive comments.
Many years ago, I wrote reviews for computer magazines, and we were always instructed to do exactly this to avoid upsetting advertisers.
Perhaps since this is such a nascent category the scores should be re-calibrated. Tech sites have done this in the past. Maybe 7 is appropriate for the Apple Watch, but then 8.1 is no longer appropriate for the Moto 360 since every reviewer who has compared them has said the Apple Watch is better.
Before asking for re-calibration, I would like to try a retail version of the watch. I want to see the extent of this lag, or slowness mentioned. For me lag, or waiting for a device to respond in 2015 is not acceptable.
True, though I always find that the average consumer likes to think they know better, and usually slates Apple for being overpriced, and they often sing praise of Android (again thinking they know better).Yeah, but the very fact that most of the audience can relate to these anchors that are excited about the watch will equal money in the bank for Apple. Apple already know they can sell the watch to a high percentage of loyal Apple fans who are into tech. It's the people who buy Apple because they think it's cool that they need to win over to break sales records.
And, judging from the anchors on this show and their reactions, I think Apple is going to be successful with this watch.
The crowds of people huddled around the watch cases at the Apple Store were huge yesterday. People of all ages.
Fair enough. I spent most of my try-on appointment focused on aesthetics and how easy it is to put the watch on and take it off. Actually here, the Sport band may be a negative for Apple. It feels decent enough, but putting it on takes some getting used to. The first step in getting it used will be putting it on. It wouldn't surprise me if one of the first improvements is releasing more "traditional" straps that are easier to put on.
If I have time this week I'll stop by the display and look at a "working" unit connected to the iPad.
Fair enough. I spent most of my try-on appointment focused on aesthetics and how easy it is to put the watch on and take it off. Actually here, the Sport band may be a negative for Apple. It feels decent enough, but putting it on takes some getting used to. The first step in getting it used will be putting it on. It wouldn't surprise me if one of the first improvements is releasing more "traditional" straps that are easier to put on.
If I have time this week I'll stop by the display and look at a "working" unit connected to the iPad.
True, though I always find that the average consumer likes to think they know better, and usually slates Apple for being overpriced, and they often sing praise of Android (again thinking they know better).
[/COLOR]By the way - can someone explain the knob joke to me? English isnt my main language . Is it something sexual?
He was being to critical of the watch and the news anchors were just letting him know it, that's all. The average person (non tech) people really care that you have to charge it every night. The only people who complain about that are people on Maceumors, and tech bloggers.
People aren't going to really care that the watch doesn't look good to fashion people.
They aren't going to care that the watch doesn't have native GPS or that it can't tell you your blood glucose level.
It's new, it's apple, and it's shiny.
Technology has never been about whether or not people actually need it. It's always been about whether or not we want it.
The verge guy, I know he gets paid to be critical, but that's what happens when you list a bunch of negatives the average person doesn't care about
the concerning part for me of the apple watch is the lag, I am worried about this in the retail. lets see
Why invite and ask a tech expert to give his opinion on a gadget only to disagree and act like you don't care? He knows more than you. It's his profession.
Cringeworthy. He's too lazy to spend 30 seconds to dock/charge the watch each night, and more obvious is that he's too lazy to put together a coherent argument or opinion.
Why invite and ask a tech expert to give his opinion on a gadget only to disagree and act like you don't care? He knows more than you. It's his profession.
The tech expert who couldn't figure out how to turn off notifications?