Originally posted by edesignuk
If they think I'm paying $49 for an iPhoto update (which is all I'd want), they've got another thing coming...
My thoughts exactly.
Originally posted by edesignuk
If they think I'm paying $49 for an iPhoto update (which is all I'd want), they've got another thing coming...
Try to think about things from the perspective of people who recently got their machines. These people paid a premium for their Macs precisely because the iLife apps were included in the price of the machine, .
Originally posted by derekamoss
TO everyone saying that looking what happend last year, everyone thought we were going to have to pay and then 2 weeks later we didn't, it was said in the keynote that they were to be free downloads and also there was a place holder on the webosite saying the date that it was to be released
Originally posted by Torajima
There lies the problem... the last version of the iApps did NOT work as advertised. iPhoto was useless if you had more than a few hundred pictures. iMovie is slower than sh*t, even on my dual G5. It also crashes quite frequently. iDVD fails to burn DVDs reliably, has serious audio synch issues, and has brought down my ENTIRE system on two seperate occasions.
If Apple wants to charge for GarageBand, fine... it's probably worth $49 all by itself. But those of us who have struggled to get ANYTHING done with the last version of iLife should NOT have to pay to upgrade iDVD, iMovie, and iPhoto.
Originally posted by latergator116
I don't think you understand that not everyone wants to pay for ALL the apps when they only need one or two.
Originally posted by Some_Big_Spoon
to get the functionality you've come to expect from your Mac, you now need to pay $180 US, not just $129
Originally posted by ac2102
Just one question, as all the iApps were free before, what was the point in shelling out for the original iLife package?
Originally posted by latergator116
Someone already brought this up, but we just paid $129 for panther and many of us don't want to shell out more money.![]()
Originally posted by ac2102
Just one question, as all the iApps were free before, what was the point in shelling out for the original iLife package?
Originally posted by evilbert420
"Seriously, that smugness in calling people who complain about this "whiners" without thinking about their position is embarrassing. The iLife package is not FREE -- it was paid for by the premium charged by Apple on their machines, and which everyone paid for."
Those versions were free, and they still work as advertised. The new versions add new features, right?
Originally posted by evilbert420
Obviously, some of you choose to whine.![]()
Obviously, some of you like to call other people names and can't address their arguments without a personal attack.
Originally posted by centauratlas
Then don't. Just use what you have.
Originally posted by Some_Big_Spoon
"iLife" was part of that system, or so we thought.
Originally posted by ITR 81
BS
I've had over 600+ pictures in iPhoto and it works fine. It's only when people near a 1,000 or go over 1,000 when they have issues.
Use Apple DVD's instead of the cheap stuff. I've never had problem with iDVD not burning to a Apple DVD-R
Originally posted by nuckinfutz
Reading this thread is unbelievable.
Welfare mentality has taken over. There has be NO agreement from Apple regarding iLife updates. You people complaining are only thinking of yourselves. You're not thinking about that software engineer with the mortgage, car payment and mouths to feed. You claim bugs are your justification for wanting a free upgrade the bugs obviously did not prevent you from using the application.
Commerce is centered around a mutual consideration for products and services. Each party must benefit. However the defining characteristic in the complaints all revolve around what YOU want.
The choice is simple. If you perceive the value of iLife to be $49 you will buy it. If you don't then you'll wait until the value proposition is more favorable to you. It's obvious that you want it because if you didn't you wouldn't be complaining on these boards.
Time for a little introspection folks. Never ASSuME anything when dealing in commerce. You stay happier.
Originally posted by Torajima
iPhoto was useless if you had more than a few hundred pictures. iMovie is slower than sh*t, even on my dual G5.
Originally posted by coolbreeze
Well, this is the last straw. Between the overpriced .mac and yearly fees to use OSX, I will just use my mac as-is from now on. Once my .mac runs out (i.e. the only reason I have to use iPhoto) I will not renew. Subsequently, I will not purchase iPhoto. I don't use iMovie because I don't have a need.
What's next? Apple charges for iTunes and Safari? How about I just let Apple bill me $50/month just for the joy of using a mac?
![]()
![]()
Oh, no iPod for me either. Wonderful Keynote. Just spectacular.