davetrow1997 said:
Now what's the VID, exactly?
Used to be known as a Visual Information Center. Now it's known as a Visual Information Division, but has the same function.
They do things like official photos, presentations, and such for the command.
davetrow1997 said:
We use something called MEDWEB, which is, I'm assuming, sort of a web-based translator of DICOM images.
MEDWEB. Sorry, but I am not familiar with MEDWEB.
davetrow1997 said:
What were the points I was using? Gosh, you should have been there... mostly I was just red-faced and white-knuckled when that little peon was smugly dismissing me....
Typical PC centric IT person it sounds like.
davetrow1997 said:
1) The interplatform compatibility is superb, allowing people who have preferences to work on macs versus PCs to pick their system at their leisure; that would improve morale and their personal workflow
Good point.
Because PC dweebs have a hard time realizing something contradicatory to their beliefs, I generally put this point like this:
MSFT Office is great. I like using Excel, Word and PowerPoint. What is really cool, is that office is available for both the Mac and the PC.
<At this point, many of the before mentioned IT dweebs have a dumbfounded look of disbelief.>
I go on to state that I use MSFT Office for the Mac to create and edit a Word documents just like I do on the PC. I use either USB flash drive to transfer the files.
davetrow1997 said:
2) The stability of the plaform running off UNIX is phenomenal.. this would allow a backup system in a number of circumstances... 1) a virus takes our Windows 2000 environment down 2) a security threat is identified for Windows that forces them to take it down for patching 3) a bug takes the system down and on and on... and all of these things have happened so far.. and we were left with jack squat for computing... plus, every time the hospital tests its generators, the dirty current that gets sent briefly takes every computer in the hospital down because the cheap bastards don't have UPSs... after they boot back up they invariably are acting buggier and buggier, to the point where they just crash incessantly.
Again, good points.
I generally approach this in the following manner.
I start out discussing OS'es in a way not to reveal my Mac preference.
Then mention that Unix is a wonderful solid and stable OS. And how some organizations are switching form Windows to Linux. For example IBM and the Japanese government.
Then I mention how the new Mac OS is basically Unix with a GUI shell.
Again, dumbfounded looks. I mention that while the original Mac OS was entirely GUI based, the new one beginning with Mac OS X is based on Unix.
davetrow1997 said:
3) I never got to point #3 because by this time the little bastard had just been repeating over and over... I know some of you guys like those MACS (he said it condescendingly and dismissively), but the Army has decided that we are going to be operating in a Windows XP enviroment (which was delayed because it doesn't work with our new EMR (Electronic Medical Record). 😡
I think that your IT Dweeb is referring to MEDCOM and not the Army.
There are plenty of examples where the Army is using Mac based systems such as:
- VID's
- Army Servers (as in THE Army Servers)
- Research environment
- MWR Marketing
...and some others.
Sorry for the delay in commenting. I missed this post somehow. Anyhow, I think that you are on the right track. The key is to get the ammo for each type of specific question. Don't be afraid to receive the question, and say something like, you make a good point, let me think about it.
Then get your ammo and launch both barrels.
BTW, Macs are now on the GSA schedule. So they are definitely not banned from purchase by Army units.
Well, I hope this helps.
Sushi