Ah, so they were the ones still using Windows Phones.
Yup, and I helped pay for it.

Ah, so they were the ones still using Windows Phones.
Why did they bother with Windows Phone to begin with?
Is that true?
It was my understanding that Windows Phones were the NYPD's first-ever smartphones, at least for the entire force.
While this is true, concerning the functionality of EMM/MDM, it fails to mention that additional development that would be required for the other platforms.The containers do not provide cross-platform apps, but rather the API/SDK's to secure the traffic from the end points.Most MDM/EMM solutions include a containerization solution that separates corporate and personal data. These are dedicated apps that provide access to corporate email, file storage, etc.
This is done, not only to protect corporate data from loss/leakage out through the user's personal apps or services; but also to provide the ability to perform a "selective wipe" instead of having to factory reset the whole device should it be lost, stolen, or the employee leave the organization.
Here is Airwatch Container, the industry de-facto standard for MDM, containerization solution: https://www.air-watch.com/downloads/resources/airWatch_container_brochure.pdf
I can't speak for NYPD, but I can for certain tell you at DHS our Windows Phones, issued around November of 2015, replaced our BlackBerry devices. And we had those for almost seven years.
Honestly, the only reason Research in Motion lasted as long as they did was because of pricey Verizon contracts and poor judgement (along with IT laziness) from the United States Government.
Not sure exactly what you mean.
How many times has the average person on this forum, myself included, paid for an iPhone? I bought the first gen iPad maxed out with 64 gig of flash and the cellular version; hardly being cheap there. And just a couple of years later it needed to be replaced.
NYPD apparently bought windows phones a few years ago in 2014 paying $160 million for 35,000 units. iPhone would have been in the same ballpark, they hardly took the cheaper way out, it's time to replace them now and they're choosing to buy iPhones. What does this have to do with a cheap person paying twice?
so lets say they switch to iPhones... does that mean they will upgrade the entire force every year to the next newer model up or do they keep them for a few years first?
I think Xbox is owed a lot of credit for keeping Microsofts bankroll where it is, not windows.
What is the name of this “secure bubble” software for mobile apps that you’re referring to? What sort of mobile VM is there that runs on all the mobile OS platforms?
No the TAXPAYER pays twice
Clearly NYC and the NYPD weren't thinking of future proofing due to the fact they chose WINDOWS phones. Also many municipalities dont update their technology and software as rapidly as other types of organization. Allowing BYOD does not guarantee interoperability, software compatibility or future proofing. IMO
I can't speak for NYPD, but I can for certain tell you at DHS our Windows Phones, issued around November of 2015, replaced our BlackBerry devices. And we had those for almost seven years.
Honestly, the only reason Research in Motion lasted as long as they did was because of pricey Verizon contracts and poor judgement (along with IT laziness) from the United States Government.
Not all the government we're cycling of BB and moving to iPhone in my little part of fedgov
When you enroll a device in BYOD, you're going to have to treat that device responsibly. A cop doesn't let his/her kid play with their radio, gun, or badge. And this will be no different.BYOD sounds fine for email or something. But I'm not sure I'd want a police force having "random" ability to perform their job- hey I couldn't use this resource because my daughter updated my phone to iOS 11 beta 3, which makes Stop&Frisk.app crash...
If Google/Alphabet ever comes out with a desktop version of Android, Windows will be toast.
Why did they bother with Windows Phone to begin with?
Changing an entire computing platform for a major organization like NYPD after just one year is not the same as you personally buying a new iPad just because you wanted something a little faster and lighter. It is such a false equivalency that it barely merits rebuttal.
That saying means if you buy something crappy, you'll end up paying again for something else. If they all bought iPhones they wouldn't be replacing all of them right now ... so they're paying again ... it's not a hard concept.Not sure exactly what you mean.
How many times has the average person on this forum, myself included, paid for an iPhone? I bought the first gen iPad maxed out with 64 gig of flash and the cellular version; hardly being cheap there. And just a couple of years later it needed to be replaced.
NYPD apparently bought windows phones a few years ago in 2014 paying $160 million for 35,000 units. iPhone would have been in the same ballpark, they hardly took the cheaper way out, it's time to replace them now and they're choosing to buy iPhones. What does this have to do with a cheap person paying twice?
That saying means if you buy something crappy, you'll end up paying again for something else. If they all bought iPhones they wouldn't be replacing all of them right now ... so they're paying again ... it's not a hard concept.
Microsoft screwed this up big time. It's amazing they still make alot of money these days.
Why not a more modern BYOD approach?
The article specifically mentioned the Windows phones were cheaper. Did you even read it?
Hence, if you go the cheap route, you'll pay more in the long run.
Technicians don't steer enterprises. Executives do. While there are certainly platform zealots in technical roles, executive, C-level employees should definitely be beyond such things.Probably budget had some part on the decision by the NYPD.
But, from my enterprise experience, I place the blame squarely on: Untrained pseudo computer-science technicians.
.
"You get what you pay for!" I feel for the poor NYC taxpayers who get to shoulder this boondoggle. "Sad"