Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A 3GS in 2017! Respect! Where did you get a 3GS a year back by the way?

Having to use the insane, poorly thought out OS that is Android today is worse than having a phone that doesn't have a headphone port. (And this is coming from someone that thinks it was a bonehead move to get rid of the headphone port!)

Long version:

I have been using a 3GS for about a year - running iOS 5. Worked great for what I needed, and the older slower phone kept me from being addicted to my phone like everyone else. In fact, I used a Treo 655p for about a year before that for the same reason (finally switched from the Treo to an iPhone because Treos freeze anytime someone sends an emoji... that got old!)

Anyway, my 3GS started to need a new battery which is not easy to come by in 2017. So I did my research and purchased the highly-rated Moto G5plus (which runs the newest major version of Android - v7, Nougat). I spent about 48 hours trying to make heads or tails of the phone before giving up and switching back to an iPhone SE.

I am a very technically-minded person and can figure out almost any technical item put before me. The issue with Android is that it is just really poorly thought out in general.
 
All I want is headphones that have more than 2 channels, and be able to do something like a pseudo-surround sound system.

For that the 3.5mm jack is obsolete.
What are on about? All headphones are 2 channels. There's one channel in your right ear, and one channel in your left ear. One plus one makes two channels.
 
Why are they even comparing this to the iPhone? Their competition is Samsung.

You are missing two point(s).

1.) They are not comparing the competition of the iPhone necessarily to the OnePlus, the article is comparing the jaded comment made by Diego Heinz that was made in relation regarding the 3.5 mm Jack being included on the OnePlus, which the iPhone does not have. Similarly, Samsung made a snide comment last year when the Note 7 released about Apple.

2.) And the article IS comparing the design (Not direct competition) of the OnePlus to the iPhone, and how it remotely resembles the 7 Plus.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
Lol, well he did say they took THREE years to design this phone. I find that surprising they went through over 100 prototypes and stuck with the Iphone 7 plus design.

Yeah, there even is a video where you can see some of the prototypes and there were some good looking ones which clearly showed the OnePlus design language of their previous phones but modernized for 2017.

Why they went with iPhone clone instead is beyond me.
 
All I want is headphones that have more than 2 channels, and be able to do something like a pseudo-surround sound system.

For that the 3.5mm jack is obsolete.

You only have two ears. Two channels is enough and can deliver anything you want.
 
Who??? Am I the only one who's never even heard of Oneplus. Is that a phone or a company? Actually that's a rhetorical question - I don't care.

One Plus is a Chinese Knockoff company whoely owned by Oppo. I wouldn't own anything Chinese that steals a US companies technology based on principle alone.
 
BTW, ANY consumer that is confused over an iPhone 7 vs One Plus 5 and accidentally buys the wrong one doesn't deserve to own a phone, period. If Apple is worried about a competitor "stealing" their design because it confuses users, it just proves that Apple thinks their customers are complete an utter morons.

Nobody wanting an iPhone 7 will make a mistake of buying a One Plus, and One Plus will not steal the market away from Apple, you can be guaranteed that.

So relax everyone, its a very decent phone that sells for much cheaper then most other flagship phones, and Apple and Samsung want us to believe cellphones today need to cost $1000+ it is great to see a company defy them and NOT copy their pricing.

Agree, with your last statement. OnePlus sells well in my country. My wife has one. It is a very decent phone indeed at about less than half the price of comparable flagship phone (I'd compare OnePlus3 with 6S+) with all the associated quirks of Android. If I were to go with Android, this would be my go to phone.
[doublepost=1498030319][/doublepost]
Do you honestly believe the removal of the headphone jack was a cost saving measure?

While that obviously wasn't a cost saving measure... know what OnePlus does to save nickles? Not provide earphones in the box.
 
somehow their designers are being paid six/seven figure salaries for this.
How much should Ive have earned for the last 3 years then, he seems to have run out of design ideas..
[doublepost=1498031532][/doublepost]
somehow their designers are being paid six/seven figure salaries for this.
How much should Ive have earned for the last 3 years then, he seems to have run out of design ideas..
[doublepost=1498031743][/doublepost]
This is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Design patent infringement.
Look at 5 year old htc designs to see where this design really came from...
 
They're really not.

http://www.soundencore.com/the-best-surround-sound-headphones-2017/
[doublepost=1498030933][/doublepost]

So why do we have 5.1 surround?

5.1 surround is to create surround sound within a space. The acoustics of the space and the way the sound enters your ears allows your brain to determine where the sound is coming from.

But for headphones, that's impossible as the speakers move with your head - there aren't any acoustics, so any more than two channels is a waste. The acoustics need to be created during recording or with processing. This can be done with 5.1 processing it down to 2.0. Look up binaural recording - it's the most immersive and incredible way of getting surround sound and it only needs two channels because it mimics your ears.

The headphones in that link simply process the 5.1/7.1 channels so it sounds like surround sound - but it still comes from only two channels. The rear channels, for example, will be phased differently to fool you into thinking they're coming from behind - but it's coming from the same two speakers that are also supplying all the other "surround" channels.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
Having to use the insane, poorly thought out OS that is Android today is worse than having a phone that doesn't have a headphone port. (And this is coming from someone that thinks it was a bonehead move to get rid of the headphone port!)

Long version:

I have been using a 3GS for about a year - running iOS 5. Worked great for what I needed, and the older slower phone kept me from being addicted to my phone like everyone else. In fact, I used a Treo 655p for about a year before that for the same reason (finally switched from the Treo to an iPhone because Treos freeze anytime someone sends an emoji... that got old!)

Anyway, my 3GS started to need a new battery which is not easy to come by in 2017. So I did my research and purchased the highly-rated Moto G5plus (which runs the newest major version of Android - v7, Nougat). I spent about 48 hours trying to make heads or tails of the phone before giving up and switching back to an iPhone SE.

I am a very technically-minded person and can figure out almost any technical item put before me. The issue with Android is that it is just really poorly thought out in general.

I think you're overstating your technical ability, I know quite a few people who are basically technical muppets but have no problem using an android phone.

They just aren't hard to use..
[doublepost=1498035178][/doublepost]
Why can't the presenters of cheap knock-offs speak proper English? It can't be that hard to find one native English speaker in all of China. With this accent I instantly get the impression of an inferior product.
Racist much?
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
They're really not.

http://www.soundencore.com/the-best-surround-sound-headphones-2017/
[doublepost=1498030933][/doublepost]

So why do we have 5.1 surround?
All those headphone examples are Dolby virtual 7.1 Note the word virtual. It's pretend, fake, you as a human being have two channels, left ear, right ear. Unless you're going to tell me you've evolved a front ear and a back ear i can't see what the problem is with the 3.5mm jack. By the way did you have a problem with the headphone jack until Apple said you should? I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
All those headphone examples are Dolby virtual 7.1 Note the word virtual. It's pretend, fake, you as a human being have two channels, left ear, right ear. Unless you're going to tell me you've evolved a front ear and a back ear i can't see what the problem is with the 3.5mm jack. By the way did you have a problem with the headphone jack until Apple said you should? I doubt it.

"Unless you're going to tell me you've evolved a front ear and a back ear"

I know we don't have that, but have you ever thought why we can hear something behind us, below us, above us and in front of us and we'll know with our eyes shut where that noise is coming from despite only having two ears? I went into detail about it here.

I never had a problem with it per se, but then again I never had a problem with VHS or cassette tapes either... Actually I tell a lie, I've always had an issue with cables. I hate untangling them and my first smashed iPhone was caused by the cable as it caught on a branch and yanked it out of my hand.

I've always wanted a better-than-stereo experience with digital music. Ever since I listened to Beatles Love album in 5.1 I was sold, it's like a totally different way of listening to music. I recommend having a listen if you can. Currently everything is recorded in hundreds of different channels and then mixed down to just two - I've always thought that was a bit silly. Seems such a waste to flatten all that spatially differentiated audio down to just two channels. It just loses all depth.

I imagine headphones in the future containing lots of smaller speakers as opposed to two large ones, all reproducing different audio tracks (guitar, bass, drums, vocals etc) and combining them in ear to create truly realistic live sound. I don't believe the jack could do this kind of thing.
 
"Unless you're going to tell me you've evolved a front ear and a back ear"

I know we don't have that, but have you ever thought why we can hear something behind us, below us, above us and in front of us and we'll know with our eyes shut where that noise is coming from despite only having two ears? I went into detail about it here.

I never had a problem with it per se, but then again I never had a problem with VHS or cassette tapes either... Actually I tell a lie, I've always had an issue with cables. I hate untangling them and my first smashed iPhone was caused by the cable as it caught on a branch and yanked it out of my hand.

I've always wanted a better-than-stereo experience with digital music. Ever since I listened to Beatles Love album in 5.1 I was sold, it's like a totally different way of listening to music. I recommend having a listen if you can. Currently everything is recorded in hundreds of different channels and then mixed down to just two - I've always thought that was a bit silly. Seems such a waste to flatten all that spatially differentiated audio down to just two channels. It just loses all depth.

I imagine headphones in the future containing lots of smaller speakers as opposed to two large ones, all reproducing different audio tracks (guitar, bass, drums, vocals etc) and combining them in ear to create truly realistic live sound. I don't believe the jack could do this kind of thing.
OK we are getting into the weeds here, yes you make great points. But the human ears aren't linear in their ability. Two ears aren't limited to stuff coming directly from the left or right. They are spacial, they can detect sounds coming from in-front or behind. My God we have gotten so far off topic talking about a headphone jack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jsameds
Headphones with 3.5mm plugs are certainly not always "cheap headphones." A $1,000+ set of custom in-ear monitors will have a 3.5mm plug, and they will for many more years. Those in professional audio who use their phones to connect to other audio gear loathe the absence of a headphone jack, and having to monkey with dongles.

Did you not read my original post? I said I have enjoy GOOD sound audio, so i pay $200 IEMs but then run them from a portable tiny high quality DAC. There's no point in having $200+ IEMS and plugging them into the headphone socket on an iPhone as the DAC costs about $3 and you won't hear the difference over a pair of $80 headphones.

The person who replied to me said it's "all very good for who likes serious audio quality but others just want convenience" to which I replied in that case they can buy a cheap set of headphones and just leave the adapter in the box connected to them. It's literally no different to before for the average user - and if they're really not bothered about sound quality but convenience they'd have been using bluetooth headphones by now anyway.
[doublepost=1498043559][/doublepost]
but I typically use the same cheap headphones in multiple devices.

so it's really not convenient to leave the dongle attached to the headphones. Nor the phone.

so there we are, still stuck at that same place. Dongle Life. it's an added potential inconvenience, with no real upside.

You can't afford to just buy a $20 pair of headphones for your phone? Come on man... If you use cheap headphones just use the lightning connect AirPods Apple gives you anyway. You're really clutching at straws here.
[doublepost=1498043671][/doublepost]
What?
If you think that is the only use case for a headphone jack you may want to think twice.
If you think everyone has the money you apparently do, you may want to consider others as well.
Making it easier and more convenient for everyone to use doesn't stop you from using it the way you want to use it.

There are no other reasons to want a headphone jack. It's not for sound quality as the iPhone DACS are terrible, so what other reason is there? Convenience. That's it - and i've outlined numerous ways in which it's no less convenient at all. It's just a non issue for any iPhone 7 owner.
 
That doesn't work when the use case isn't headphones or your device at all. For example, when I visited my mother, I plugged my phone into her stereo, and it doesn't have bluetooth, so that required a cable.

I might also be in a friend's car (that doesn't have Bluetooth but has an 3.5mm Aux input and cable) and wanted to share a podcast or music... and who always has a dongle in their pocket? :)

Who always has a Aux cable in their pocket? If you can make sure there's an Aux cable available at all times, surely you can make sure there's a lightning plug on the end of it? Having wires with adapters on the end to plug into cars and speakers might be a bit ghetto but so is a headunit without bluetooth and a speaker without Airplay :p
 
OK we are getting into the weeds here, yes you make great points. But the human ears aren't linear in their ability. Two ears aren't limited to stuff coming directly from the left or right. They are spacial, they can detect sounds coming from in-front or behind. My God we have gotten so far off topic talking about a headphone jack.

Haha that's the way it should be though :D Everyone is so distracted by "How will I charge and listen to music" arguments they're missing the real interesting discussion about what the future of music will be.

Of course I may be totally wrong, but I do believe big change is coming. The music industry is once again sitting on its laurels and needs to innovate again. The last big innovation was being able to download music - and that's about it. Not much has really changed in 15 years, except now we stream it instead of download it (which is practically the same thing when you think about it).

I hope for something like I have mentioned, and I do believe ditching the jack paves the way for such technologies to arise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
The absolute audacity. While I'd prefer the iPhone have a headphone jack, that is only for other people. I myself do not personally care. I only use the headphones provided with iPhones for non-audiophile listening and I don't imagine a situation where my battery is critically low and I have the insatiable urge to also listen to music not played through the speakers. Still, mocking a product you've just ripped off, wow. How shameless.
 
I think to be fair it is only in the design. If you tear apart hardware components or software they are all different.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.