'yuck.’
Who wants a stylus?
'yuck.’
How did you arrive at that conclusion? Care to share the sample images that you apparently based your point on?The tech is still not fully baked. Hopefully, it can be developed to where image quality is not compromised, but it’s a big step in the right direction.
1. Apple not only needs the under screen Camera to be up to Apple Standard, but it also needs to feature FaceID, InFra Red, Dot Projector... etc I wonder if the transparent OLED will make FaceID much more difficult?
How did you arrive at that conclusion? Care to share the sample images that you apparently based your point on?
How did you arrive at that conclusion? Care to share the sample images that you apparently based your point on?
definitely looking forward to the "Next Big Thing" as significant as the original iPhone: getting rid of that horrible notch.
Sorry state of affairs when the biggest technology push is trying to undo Apple's mistakes
In this selfie obsessed culture having a trashy front facing camera will eliminate a large percentage of consumers especially millennialsQuality of the camera? We don't care about the quality of the camera. We're used to the front facing camera being a potato. - Anyone with an iMac or Mac laptop
Seriously though, this is a good first step I think. As Oppo and others continue to develop the tech, the front facing image will get better. Heck Google's current camera voodoo could probably make it even better right now.
Not me, not on a phone not even a "big" phone.Who wants a stylus?
It's useful for video calls though.In tgi
In this selfie obsessed culture having a trashy front facing camera will eliminate a large percentage of consumers especially millennials
I know a lot of young people who FaceTime more then they make traditional phone calls. You really think it’s smart to alienate a large percentage of consumersSo much overengineering from so many manufacturers when the obvious solution is to just get rid of the front camera altogether.
Video calling is a convenient feature but who really uses it on a regular basis? And the sooner we kill the pouty selfie the better.
How did you arrive at that conclusion? Care to share the sample images that you apparently based your point on?
No such thing. All cameras are a compromise, one way or another - whether that's your phone or a medium format camera. However, this may be a case of a compromise too far - the laws of physics (photons) continue to apply.I’d rather have an uncompromising camera.
If they need to come out in front and make that statement before even releasing sample shots, it translates as: The image quality is hot garbage.The company has already admitted that putting a camera under the screen will make it harder to match the quality of an unobstructed smartphone camera.
I don't think anybody was pissed that other phones offered face scanning before Apple came out with FaceID because those other, earlier systems weren't as secure as TouchID.Nah, you are just pissed the Chinese did it first! If Apple did it, you will say Apple so innovative!
The quality isn’t as good, but software will compensate. Thank you Apple for staying away from this.