Yeah.... exactly ....
I'm partially just poking fun with the negative emoji comments, but at the same time? This is 100% true, too!
I work for a company where we use Macs in about a 50/50 mix with Windows machines. Truth is, my boss is a long time Mac guy and would like to see 100% Mac adoption in the business. But realistically, it will never happen. Apple's focus in recent years just keeps more and more of us on the Windows platform for computing, and even Android for mobile phones in some cases.
It's pretty clear that Apple has no interest in doing anything with the back-end/server side of things. The people who keep buying rows and rows of Mac Minis and mounting them in server racks, or who spend $$$'s to put new Mac Pros in racks on their sides, in special rack adapters are a niche minority who insist on doing it despite logic and common sense dictating otherwise. We have 1 system running OS X Server and it's ONLY because we want the native MDM capability (remote device management) that it gives to our users with iPads and iPhones.
For user workstations? Sure, Macs are generally fine. (Still love the relative lack of malware hassles, among other benefits.) But networking has always been a weak spot for Apple that they just don't seem to make a priority. EG. When you establish an L2TP client VPN connection from any Mac where your network adapter has a static IP, the VPN routing is completely broken. Users are perpetually confused with shared drives on our servers, too. (If you connect to a shared resource and drag it to the Finder sidebar as a shortcut? The shortcut tends to break and generate "can't connect" type of errors when it's clicked. That's really unfortunate because it would, by far, be the easiest way to set someone's workstation up so they can easily access the network drive resources whenever they need them.)
I'm partially just poking fun with the negative emoji comments, but at the same time? This is 100% true, too!
I work for a company where we use Macs in about a 50/50 mix with Windows machines. Truth is, my boss is a long time Mac guy and would like to see 100% Mac adoption in the business. But realistically, it will never happen. Apple's focus in recent years just keeps more and more of us on the Windows platform for computing, and even Android for mobile phones in some cases.
It's pretty clear that Apple has no interest in doing anything with the back-end/server side of things. The people who keep buying rows and rows of Mac Minis and mounting them in server racks, or who spend $$$'s to put new Mac Pros in racks on their sides, in special rack adapters are a niche minority who insist on doing it despite logic and common sense dictating otherwise. We have 1 system running OS X Server and it's ONLY because we want the native MDM capability (remote device management) that it gives to our users with iPads and iPhones.
For user workstations? Sure, Macs are generally fine. (Still love the relative lack of malware hassles, among other benefits.) But networking has always been a weak spot for Apple that they just don't seem to make a priority. EG. When you establish an L2TP client VPN connection from any Mac where your network adapter has a static IP, the VPN routing is completely broken. Users are perpetually confused with shared drives on our servers, too. (If you connect to a shared resource and drag it to the Finder sidebar as a shortcut? The shortcut tends to break and generate "can't connect" type of errors when it's clicked. That's really unfortunate because it would, by far, be the easiest way to set someone's workstation up so they can easily access the network drive resources whenever they need them.)
Well, I gave up on Apple as a business oriented OS when they decided to put all their emphasis on the mobile toys. I know it generates them massive revenue, but they left an entire segment of their userbase out in the cold. I ran several MacOS X based servers. That product was an absolute joke, and still is...actually even more so now. I'm running server version 3.x (don't remember which exact revision, but it's the latest on 10.9) and it's a child's toy compared to other *NIX based server operating systems. In fact, I moved all critical functionality off of OS X and migrated it over to Unix VM's.
So, in an admittedly judgmental wording: I suppose you don't get pissy about these things when you don't do "real" things with your Mac. I have real stuff to run, that needs real uptime, and uses industry accepted standards, not some weird faux-UNIX system with oddities left and right (like the nonstandard formatted Apache logs Apple uses that forced me to edit the regex for OSSEC monitoring). I see you say you run your business on your Macs. Hey, that's great, but I can speak from experience that their server offering is an effing joke that they should just pull already.
At first glance it's understandable that folks would say, "but obviously they are doing OTHER things besides emojis!" Well, their awful performance and poor track record over the last few YEARS makes me think otherwise. It does indeed seem like they are only putting effort into trivial items. Of course they do bug fixing, but it's extremely selective and they drag their feet forever getting these patches out that shouldn't have been problem to begin with.