Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
........
itunes4.jpg


....



no

think iTunes 5.
itunes5.jpg


vs. iTunes 8

whatsnew-genius-20090311.jpg


No contest. iTunes 5 was beautiful.
 
There's no such thing as a "Marble" theme. It was a baseless rumor. It doesn't even make sense, because marble looks like this.



It was a rumor about a new interface revamp one of the Mac sites posted long ago when we knew little about Snow Leopard, and for some reason, nobody has let go of it.

I use 4 to 7 monitors with my Intel Mac Pro. I'm in the Income tax prep/accounting field. Try a few displays, you'll like the increased work space.
 
What Apple needs to change in the interface of iTunes is the giant section at the top that display playback, syncing, and other information. It looks like like a dot matrix display from an old nintendo gameboy. Needs a BIG facelift (should look more like the iPhone's playback controls whole listening to music).
 
so far I am not that impressed with the over-hyped Snow Leopard—no wonder it is less than $30!

WHERE ARE THE MULTIPLE OPTONS FOR FONT SMOOTHING STYLE?

Is Apple NOT going to give us options with Font smoothing as they did with all other versions of OS X? Even Windows gives options for it's version of Font smoothing.

If this is the case, I will not upgrade to SL, even though they are giving this dog away for almost free.

Apple's font smoothing is one of the main reasons keeping me from using windows. MS Windows 7 is not looking so bad now.

Also, the on / off toggle for font smoothing in SL does not look too good. Small fonts in a browser look like crap in SL.

Not sure this is what you're looking for...


What Apple needs to change in the interface of iTunes is the giant section at the top that display playback, syncing, and other information. It looks like like a dot matrix display from an old nintendo gameboy. Needs a BIG facelift (should look more like the iPhone's playback controls whole listening to music).

And make it a color thing? That would look terrible with the grayish theme OS X has now. If we had Marble, and Marble brought black windows (which I wouldn't like) then it would good.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    97.1 KB · Views: 152
Come on, guys.
Not too harsh.

It's like donating money to your favorite football club. Like paying too much money to Manchester United via buying a new home-shirt at the shop inside the stadium. :p
You KNOW you are paying far too much money for something you can get a lot cheaper... but you want to pay for it...

He is simply enthusiastic! And he is willing to pay more for something he really wants.

It's amazing how many people took that comment seriously...EVEN if he wanted he wouldn't be able to pay more to Apple...they would send the check back to his house. Go figure, people...
 
so far I am not that impressed with the over-hyped Snow Leopard—no wonder it is less than $30!

WHERE ARE THE MULTIPLE OPTONS FOR FONT SMOOTHING STYLE?

Is Apple NOT going to give us options with Font smoothing as they did with all other versions of OS X? Even Windows gives options for it's version of Font smoothing.

If this is the case, I will not upgrade to SL, even though they are giving this dog away for almost free.

Apple's font smoothing is one of the main reasons keeping me from using windows. MS Windows 7 is not looking so bad now.

Also, the on / off toggle for font smoothing in SL does not look too good. Small fonts in a browser look like crap in SL.
It is somewhat annoying that Apple doesn't want you to touch anything when it comes to customizing OS X. Then again that leaves it open to anyone willing to use Terminal. :cool:
 
so far I am not that impressed with the over-hyped Snow Leopard—no wonder it is less than $30!

WHERE ARE THE MULTIPLE OPTONS FOR FONT SMOOTHING STYLE?

Is Apple NOT going to give us options with Font smoothing as they did with all other versions of OS X? Even Windows gives options for it's version of Font smoothing.

If this is the case, I will not upgrade to SL, even though they are giving this dog away for almost free.

Apple's font smoothing is one of the main reasons keeping me from using windows. MS Windows 7 is not looking so bad now.

Also, the on / off toggle for font smoothing in SL does not look too good. Small fonts in a browser look like crap in SL.

Overhyped?
 
I have no idea what you talk about in terms of "font smoothing options"...what I would ask instead is: why do fonts look SO bad in every version of Windows when compared with OS X?
I don't think they look bad at all.

But to answer your question, Apple uses Quartz for font smoothing, while Microsoft uses ClearType. Different font smoothing techniques, but both look fine on their respective platforms.

As for "font smoothing options," he's referring to how Leopard gave you various choices in terms of the amount of smoothing: heavy, medium, light, etc. But in Snow Leopard, you don't have that anymore. It's either on or off.

Of course, what does Windows have to do at all with this thread, which is about Snow Leopard?
 
I don't think they look bad at all.

But to answer your question, Apple uses Quartz for font smoothing, while Microsoft uses ClearType. Different font smoothing techniques, but both look fine on their respective platforms.

As for "font smoothing options," he's referring to how Leopard gave you various choices in terms of the amount of smoothing: heavy, medium, light, etc. But in Snow Leopard, you don't have that anymore. It's either on or off.

Of course, what does Windows have to do at all with this thread, which is about Snow Leopard?

Thanks for the info, I don't have SL here because SL doesn't exist yet. I think this is worth complaining only when the beast is out...not now when it's just an unreleased beta.
 
I have no idea what you talk about in terms of "font smoothing options"...what I would ask instead is: why do fonts look SO bad in every version of Windows when compared with OS X?

In Leopard, when you open the Appearance Preferences, on the bottom you can choose between font smoothing styles. Font Smoothing is done by using the sub-pixels (red, green, blue) inside every pixel for finer smoothing. Depending on your display type, you may need different font smoothing because your display has the red green and blue sub-pixels the other way around, or you're using a CRT with alternating pixel grids (actually, many HDTVs do that too).

Anyway, this option is very important for people using an external display in portrait mode (i.e. turned 90°). Makes the text sharper. The "ClearType" in windows doesn't really do it right and makes those green and pink artefacts and the text just looks blurry.

More about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpixel_rendering

On a side note, I see no difference when changing the "Font smoothing style" in Leopard, neither on the Macbook's display, nor on the external. Maybe that's why they took it out?
 
Seriously, what is Marble? Cause I never heard Apple mention anything about Marble being a UI name.
It's nothing. It's just some "mythical" UI that people are convinced Apple is working on, which they aren't. All we are seeing are Aqua refinements, improvements and evolutions. People are kidding themselves with all this "Marble" talk.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.