Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Android in Parallels? I've run Android in VirtualBox, but it was some weird version that was compiled for Intel processors. Can Parallels actually emulate the ARM processors and run the same Android that is on phones? If so, it could also run iOS with some more tweaking/features!

----------

Still overpriced, lol...

I agree with this. Why isn't there some kind of commercial, high-quality version of WINE that makes it easy for consumers and has the cool features that Parallels has? There's CrossOver, but it's clunky and still difficult to use. I like being able to run Windows apps without running Windows.
 
FYI.

I just called NewEgg and asked them about this. What they told me is that it is a promotion from Parallels and they know almost nothing about it. I would have to contact Parallels and ask them about it.

Something rubbed me the wrong way, so I immediately cancelled my order. I can always re-order if necessary.

Now to contact Parallels about it; I will use the link to NewEgg and ask specifically if that product will qualify for the free upgrade.

*** AS FAR AS I CAN TELL THERE IS NO WAY TO GET TO TALK TO SOMEONE, VIA EMAIL, VIA CHAT, OR VIA PHONE AT PARALLELS UNLESS YOU PURCHASE THEIR PRODUCT FIRST!
This is a HUGE warning sign to me, it means that they won't bother talking to you until they have your money in their pockets. I cannot call them and ask them if that version (giving them the link directly to New Egg Parallels) will qualify for the free upgrade.

If someone else who has support with them wants to ask this, please make sure you link the page to them and specifically ask about THAT product. I get the feeling they will deny the upgrade request.
 
Last edited:
While they have never nagged me, I noticed while downloading VM Ware Fusion (I have both Fusion and Parallels) today that there was two download versions...a "lite" and a full. The difference seemed to be that the full had McAfee antivirus included in the file, not dissimilar to my experience with Parallels. Went with the Lite version and I'm sure thats the last I'll hear of it. Also resulted in the download being just shy of 1/3rd of the size of the McAfee bundled copy of VM Ware Fusion.
The full version of the VMware Fusion installation package is necessary, if the target computer has no internet connection. The full version includes not only Anti-Virus tools for Windows, the full version includes also VMware Tools (VM drivers) for many supported guest OSs, such as Darwin, Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, Solaris and so on. If you do not download the full version, the installed version of VMware Fusion downloads the necessary VMware Tools, if necessary (this requires an internet connection on the target computer). In the full version of the installation package, you can select what you want to install.
 
OVER the years, it's been: VMWare fusion = more stable, Parallels = more powerful (especially graphics wise)
I'm not sure about about now

I used VMWare fusion for a while, and I'm giving Parallels a try now! I'm excited

What about VirtualBox? I'm wondering how fast/stable that is compared to the paid VM programs.
 
I use Macs since 1992. And I never, NEVER, use a PC running windows in my house since that date. I always used Mac apps to read Word docs and all. I bring work to home from my office (PC envoironment) and continue it on my Mac in my house. Never had problems or limitations. I remember that my Boss give me a Powerpoint presentation assigment and novody believed me it was made on a Mac. People still wrong about what a Mac can do even today. Wake up and smell the coffee, Macs are full capable of doing everything.
 
What about VirtualBox? I'm wondering how fast/stable that is compared to the paid VM programs.

I used it, it crashed a ton and was quite slow. BUT it did work for some apps. It will NOT work for gaming.

----------

People still wrong about what a Mac can do even today. Wake up and smell the coffee, Macs are full capable of doing everything.

Except for playing specific games.
 
OVER the years, it's been: VMWare fusion = more stable, Parallels = more powerful (especially graphics wise)
I'm not sure about about now

I used VMWare fusion for a while, and I'm giving Parallels a try now! I'm excited

I'm a Graphic Designer, we have VMWare Fusion at work and I hate it. It uses way too much of my memory (2011 iMac w/ 8GB RAM installed) to the point where if I have medium-to-large sized files open in Photoshop it slows my entire system down. I try to open it as rarely as possible. I'm wondering if Parallels would fare any better on my machine.
 
Smaller? That's a full 1920x1200 desktop you're seeing, which is a quarter of the OSX desktop running at highest scaling setting. Seems to be exactly right to me.

So if you open Notepad in Coherance mode and make it full screen, how does it look? Thats what I'm getting at. I assume you'll have to up the Windows font dpi setting to 125% to see the text ok?
 
I already had Parallels 7, but I bought it again using the NewEgg promo.

What do I need to do, to get the upgrade?
Do I need to wait till the NewEgg order shows up?
 
I'm sure this product will hold up just as well as 6 & 7 for us.

My wife runs P7 at our business on her '10 iMac literally 24/7 running Win7Business, QuickBooks Pro 12, Office 10 and our medical practice software client and I've yet to have one problem.... with the computer or Parallels.

Never seen ads or anything for that matter that people are complaining about.
It has been rock solid for 2 straight years and the computer hasn't been turned off other than software updates or occasional power outage.

I can say I'm just fine with a $50 or 13 cents per day when it is making me money, which I can not 100% say the same for 3 of our 20 Windows workstations that randomly decide they're taking a siesta out of nowhere. Every minute they don't work is another minute you're paying someone without them working, no bueno my friends.
 
Very confusing

I just installed it and tested with MBP retina and a 27 Cinema together. It is a mess. Retina support is enabled by default (probably because it detects my retina display as second display) but on the Cinema everything looks huge. Probably because Parallels thinks all displays are retina and just doubles everything on Cinema (non-retina) and short of disabling retina support this can't be fixed.

Good luck trying to move windows from one screen to another -- it is next to impossible. In fact, I could not successfully place a window on screen #2 (retina) I gave up.

Apple's full-screen app feature is disabled by default. When you click the upper-right full-screen icon, the virtual machine goes into full screen but stays in the same space as a window. You have to now "use all displays" to get the virtual machine to behave like a real full screen app -- and I just explained above that at least with MBP retina + 27" Cinema configuration this is so buggy that it simply does not work. In addition to completely failing to place windows on screen 2, it completely messes up desktop background.

No 3-rd party software should mess with the full-screen app button in upper-right corner. Parallels Desktop is the first app I know that does this and it makes me upset. This function is a part of OS (Mountain) Lion user experience, not something software makers should modify. Add your own full-screen button next to it for windowed full-screen mode, but leave OS X full-screen functionality alone. The reason I am so upset about this is because full-screen app functionality of OS X makes most sense for running a virtual machine. It gives the virtual machine a good visual separation from OS X. Parallels pooping on this functionality is very ironic.
 
I'm a Graphic Designer, we have VMWare Fusion at work and I hate it. It uses way too much of my memory (2011 iMac w/ 8GB RAM installed) to the point where if I have medium-to-large sized files open in Photoshop it slows my entire system down. I try to open it as rarely as possible. I'm wondering if Parallels would fare any better on my machine.

My experience is that you're trying to allocate too much memory to the virtual machine. With 8GB of RAM, I am assuming you're running Windows 7x64, you shouldn't allocate more then 5 or 6GB to the VM, otherwise you start starving out OSX and it's applications which will really reduce performance. It is better to run out of RAM in the virtual machine. If you're running 32 bit windows, don't bother allocating more than 3.5GB because Windows can't use more than that.

Yesterday I had to run two copies of Windows 7x64 (at the same time), both with 4GB of RAM allocated to it and it dragged my system WAY down. But I knew I was paging like crazy because I only have 8 GB of RAM in the system.

And to answer your question, no Parallels won't help that much if you do the same thing. When you set up the VM you have to make sure you don't over commit your system, otherwise it will perform poorly. If you have 2 Cores in your machine, only give 1 to the VM. And don't give more then 75% of AVAILABLE RAM to it either (not just what's installed in your machine). If you're using 4GB in OSX and you have 8GB in your system. You can't give 4GB to the VM because it allocates it all at once and you'll starve out OSX causing lots of issues.

Good Luck.
 
I already had Parallels 7, but I bought it again using the NewEgg promo.

What do I need to do, to get the upgrade?
Do I need to wait till the NewEgg order shows up?

I think so. You'll probably have to fill out a form on Parallel's website and they'll ask for the activation code. Or, you might be able to request one using the receipt but it will probably take longer.
 
I already had Parallels 7, but I bought it again using the NewEgg promo.

What do I need to do, to get the upgrade?
Do I need to wait till the NewEgg order shows up?

It still hasn't been determined if it will qualify for the upgrade. Also yes, you'll have to wait for it to arrive because you'll need to enter the registration code.

----------

There's a Wine system extention for it based on Unix. Know your Mac before judge it.

Wine is OK for SOME games. Sorry I don't have 40 hours tinkering around with a wine wrapper to get a new game running. I did get some games running, but that was far and few between. So many of the good wrappers other people made are for old versions of the games that are already updated breaking the wrapper, or no longer linked anywhere. It is, BY FAR, not a solution for those who are not technically savvy; and for those who are, it can still be a lot of work.
 
My experience is that you're trying to allocate too much memory to the virtual machine. With 8GB of RAM, I am assuming you're running Windows 7x64, you shouldn't allocate more then 5 or 6GB to the VM, otherwise you start starving out OSX and it's applications which will really reduce performance. It is better to run out of RAM in the virtual machine. If you're running 32 bit windows, don't bother allocating more than 3.5GB because Windows can't use more than that.

Yesterday I had to run two copies of Windows 7x64 (at the same time), both with 4GB of RAM allocated to it and it dragged my system WAY down. But I knew I was paging like crazy because I only have 8 GB of RAM in the system.

And to answer your question, no Parallels won't help that much if you do the same thing. When you set up the VM you have to make sure you don't over commit your system, otherwise it will perform poorly. If you have 2 Cores in your machine, only give 1 to the VM. And don't give more then 75% of AVAILABLE RAM to it either (not just what's installed in your machine). If you're using 4GB in OSX and you have 8GB in your system. You can't give 4GB to the VM because it allocates it all at once and you'll starve out OSX causing lots of issues.

Good Luck.

You're correct, I'm running Windows 7x64. The issue is that simply having VMWare Fusion open, even if I'm not running any applications, seems to use about 3 Gigs of RAM. My iMac has a quad-core processor. Since I have Photoshop set to use 75% of my available RAM I think VMWare and PS are competing for memory. The other designers in my department leave it running all day while they work but that doesn't seem to work well for me at all and I'm not sure why. So you don't feel that Parallels is more efficient with it's RAM usage?
 
Has anyone received an UPGRADE code to download Parallels 8 yet? I contacted their CHAT support and they are pretty clueless and actually suggested I downgrade my full purchase price Parallels 7 to a trial version of Parallels 8 until the key comes.

Just curious why the Parallels website says it is available for upgraders today if their tech support and concern support doesn't have any idea about this.
 
Why these companies make new vesions every year with a few more features and we have to pay again and again, why not a free upgrade? So in order to have the latest software, I have to pay $100 every year? It could easily be more expensive than the windows laptop I spend on.
 
I've upgraded to Parallels 8, if anybody has any question just ask

Here comes some screenshots, they're in spanish but you get an idea.
 

Attachments

  • Captura de pantalla 2012-08-30 a la(s) 18.25.02.png
    Captura de pantalla 2012-08-30 a la(s) 18.25.02.png
    465.7 KB · Views: 130
  • Captura de pantalla 2012-08-30 a la(s) 18.25.09.png
    Captura de pantalla 2012-08-30 a la(s) 18.25.09.png
    196.8 KB · Views: 104
  • Captura de pantalla 2012-08-30 a la(s) 18.25.20.png
    Captura de pantalla 2012-08-30 a la(s) 18.25.20.png
    104 KB · Views: 102
I used it, it crashed a ton and was quite slow. BUT it did work for some apps. It will NOT work for gaming.

----------



Except for playing specific games.

If you're talking about Macs (the hardware), the Mac is the most versatile machine since it can run Mac OS, many Linux OSs, and Windows. I use Mac OS on my Mac as a personal computer OS, and then if there is a game or something that won't work in it (which is rare for me), I do it in Windows or sometimes WINE (if it works).

Isn't the main reason why WINE has issues running Windows games that WINE doesn't come with the right drivers and other software? Some Mac game ports like Spore use WINE and have the correct drivers built-into the package. It seems like someone should be able to make a WINE that can run everything that Windows can right out of the package.
 
Now gaming, my mac is an i7 2.8 2009 iMac, AMD 4850

Alan Wake 720P High settings Parallels 7
attachment.php




Alan Wake 720P High settings Parallels 8
attachment.php



Notice in Parallels 8, the light glitches are gone
 

Attachments

  • Parallels7.png
    Parallels7.png
    797.6 KB · Views: 1,243
  • Parallels8.png
    Parallels8.png
    870.5 KB · Views: 1,232
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.