It's called "concern trolling", and it's definitely a thing. Here, educate yourself.
Definition: A person who posts on a blog thread, in the guise of "concern," to disrupt dialogue or undermine morale by pointing out that posters and/or the site may be getting themselves in trouble, usually with an authority or power. They point out problems that don't really exist. The intent is to derail, stifle, control, the dialogue.
It's called "concern trolling", and it's definitely a thing. Here, educate yourself.
Definition: A person who posts on a blog thread, in the guise of "concern," to disrupt dialogue or undermine morale by pointing out that posters and/or the site may be getting themselves in trouble, usually with an authority or power. They point out problems that don't really exist. The intent is to derail, stifle, control, the dialogue.
But who cares - why even make the comparison. Why the pissing contest.
I am sure Pebble is breaking out the champagne with the results of their campaign which is only a few hours old.
I swear...
You're right, they're not comparable. Apple Watch is a Lexus and Pebble is a Toyota. Both are for different markets.
You're right, they're not comparable. Apple Watch is a Lexus and Pebble is a Toyota. Both are for different markets.
Agreed, and extending... They should have enough market intel/feel for their audience to predict sales without Kickstarter.
So this says to me, they are grasping as they know how the Apple Watch platform/Apple Ecosystem crucifies their offering and are striving to gain momentum before that happens.
Yeah, but... most Lexus cars will drive for longer than 3-4 hours on a full tank of gas...
Compared to a Prius?
Yeah, but... most Lexus cars will drive for longer than 3-4 hours on a full tank of gas...
So, basically some kind of concern trolling (too horrible to live variant... ;-). Ironic versus your other post.
And there we have it folks - a (horrible) car analogy!!!
I think you have officially lost track of your own analogy.
This is confusing to me about the pebble's 'water resistance'. But, swimming to me IS underwater. I don't understand.
And you keep assuming the larger watch is going to have a different battery....any other incorrect assumptions or stuff you want to make up?The rumor was 4h active use, and now its 3h... Not content of the rumor, lets stretch it (using means using the screen). How long do you look at your Iphone screen per day... 4h?
If you actually use your watch screen 4h (or even 3h) a day I think you probably would be in dire need of watch rehab.
Also, again, which watch are you talking about; small one, big one, there's a substantial volume difference between them?
I have nothing against Pebble at all; it has its niche. But, this kind of straw man attack against Apple watch, smacks of desperation. You don't have to resort to trash the Apple Watch to appreciate your own. They both can live in their own little word.
Not really. I was comparing 2 mid range things and 2 high range things. Both Apple Watch and Pebble are great in their own way for the markets they're intended for. Same with the cars.
Lexus IS Toyota....You're right, they're not comparable. Apple Watch is a Lexus and Pebble is a Toyota. Both are for different markets.
Lexus IS Toyota....
People who use Kickstarter are idiots. Yes, lets fund a company and get zero equity in return. That will so them!
Anyone can drive any of those cars.
Only iOS users can use the Apple Watch.
Car analogies never work. Unless you're actually talking about cars.
I know, but they're marketed separately.
Forget it, not worth arguing this analogy anymore.
Analogies are never perfect, it's impossible to be. Why are people so difficult when others do analogies?
The point of the original car analogy was to point that one watch was premium and one was not. That worked.
An analogy is like 'a group of boys is like a pack of wolves'. It's true in some sense, but not most.
Tell me ONE analogy that works according to your 'perfect' use of the word.
People who use Kickstarter are idiots. Yes, lets fund a company and get zero equity in return. That will so them!
Analogies are never perfect, it's impossible to be. Why are people so difficult when others do analogies?
The point of the original car analogy was to point that one watch was premium and one was not. That worked.
An analogy is like 'a group of boys is like a pack of wolves'. It's true in some sense, but not most.
Tell me ONE analogy that works according to your 'perfect' use of the word.
Oh, you're wrong sbout the 'anyone can drive a car'... Thats not true. If we're being 'perfect' about it, only about half the population can drive. So that fits that half of the population has an iPhone.
A car requires a drivers license which means the person is of legal age and is not blind. Of course, even that isnt the whole story, ther person can not be drunk, sleeping, and must have access to a car.