Now my iMac will be out of date, but oh well, it doesn't really matter since I'm happy with it and it was bound to be out of date soon enough.
"not the newest/shiniest thing" is not the same as "out of date."
Now my iMac will be out of date, but oh well, it doesn't really matter since I'm happy with it and it was bound to be out of date soon enough.
i bought mine in aug. i'm glad they are updating them. now we can kinda go by intel's roadmap on when to expect a processor bump, and not this apple secrecy garbage.Well, it was time that I got the Apple Blues anyway. I bought my iMac last October.![]()
I'm quite happy with my Day One Al 24" iMac, but I think the Mac Mini will serve me better then thetv so any improvement to it would be most-welcomed.
![]()
You're not going to see the GMA X3500 on Intel's mobile platform.Not quite the case.
Mac Mini has i945G chipset with Intel GMA350. This chipset does NOT support Penryn and it's not pin compatible with i965G. (I'm talking about Northbridge pins)
So, Apple needs to design a new motherboard for the Mini to update it to Penryn.
X3500 upgrade would be better but I highly doubt it since not even Macbooks have this. I wonder why Apple is not using X3100 instead of X3500, since X3500 has hardware support for OpenGL 2.0.
Well... Montevina will have X4500 with full HD decode/encode and OpenGL 2.0. I guess they are just going to skip X3500.
Do the iMac's need to be slimmer? I mean I could see you slimming down the portables, they are mobile and can always be lighter, but an already anorexic desktop? Meh...
Now this is some good news at last![]()
Updated Mac Mini with SR chipset with 4Gb RAM/GM-X3100 Graphics and cool but powerful Penryn.
Will get one the day it is out - I love my 1.66 CD Mac Mini but it is slow for today.
Isn't it GMAX3100?
SR..yes.
4GB...yes (heck, why not 8GB?)
X3100...hell yess!
Any hardware based off of the GM965 chipset is going to have the GMA X3100 with hardware shaders.It will be lame if they use the GMA3100. It doesn't have hardware transformation and lighting like the X3100 does.
Isn't it GMAX3100?
Would buy an updated mini in a heartbeat...the GMA 950 has been the only thing holding me back.
The Apple studio displays aren't LED backlit are they? I only ask in this thread because of the mac mini connection.
Any hardware based off of the GM965 chipset is going to have the GMA X3100 with hardware shaders.
Studio displays? No. Neither are the current Cinema displays, which I think you mean. But they still have a better color gambit than any Apple portable with an LED screen.
Would you please find me a notebook chipset that uses the GMA3100?The MacScoop article specifically says GMA3100, not GMAX3100. There are differences:
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1488.htm
It's logical that the iMac and Mac mini get updated a few weeks AFTER the portable updates.
I don't really see how this is that great of a rumor.
I was completely happy with my 27" Sony Trinitron. I imagine they should have never pushed technology to make newer TV's slimmer.
See how that logic doesn't quite work?
Would you please find me a notebook chipset that uses the GMA3100?
My original post on the GM965 is still valid.
You're golden if the box hasn't been opened and you're within 14 days of purchase. Just call Apple and they'll exchange it, no problem.Hello, Macrumors.
I recently (I mean, really recently) purchased a new iMac 24" with standard options (I'm not sure if Applecare counts as customization, if it does I'm screwed). What I want to know is: can someone direct me to Apple's policy on the matter of exchanging for a newer product. The computer is supposed to arrive next week, so if Apple updates the line, does that mean I'm screwed? I'd really appreciate any help on the matter.
Cheers,
Kenny
the iMac could really use:
1- upgradable graphics card (even if it is a small one, the basic chip used in imac stinks or is lower range)
2- Blu-Ray (instead of having a superdrive, add a Superdrive that can read Blu-Ray)