Many thanks for the congratulations and kind words regarding my last post. It almost makes me think that maybe I should take my lens cap off more often.![]()
Thanks, Dale. That's funny, if anything, I would associate the opposite photo with each point you made, but that kind of difference is what makes talking about photos so much fun. I would explain it by noting that detailed areas have visual weight, but areas with bright colors do as well (anything that attracts the eye has visual weight).
Nonetheless, I'm happy to hear that someone prefers the shot with the sun in it. That one is a risky, rule-breaking kind of photo, much more so than "Kindred Spirits." The latter is a very lucky shot to get, though, which is surely what appealed to the editors who chose it: a concentrated grove of larches in their autumn state set below a sky that momentarily matches them in color, and with the silhouette of a prominent mountain peak echoing their forms--and all of this correspondence cranked up a notch by a sea of fog stretching between these points of interest. In other words: SUPER DUMB LUCK!Hehe. I honestly didn't even know that grove was there before I drove up to that location that evening. Looking through my set in Lightroom, it's funny to see me take interest in the grove, then abandon it and go somewhere else, only to come running back when the sky turned orange. If only I could be so lucky on every outing...::::sigh::::....
Anyway, I had forgotten about Critique of the Week; yes, by all means, post it up on Monday! Friday through Sunday tends to be pretty slow around here, so a new thread like that might get buried if posted before Monday. I think the thread could be a real winner, and I look forward to participating in it.
Well, it's just not a very inspiring composition! With most of the photographers who post here, I can generally understand what excited them about a particular moment or location... but not this shot. What would I have done differently? I wouldn't have pressed the shutter...
Mine for the first:
So here in Sudbury, Ontario, it is dull and grey and +2 C. We had a snow overnight that's melting. I thought I'd go out with the 105 just to mess about. This plant has been in my kitchen for a month and a half now. So before I headed to the bush, I took it outside, put it on the railing and took a couple of hand held shots. It's not a good photo I know. But as I was making some adjustments to the RAW file, I noticed the bug at exactly 9 o'clock from the centre of the flower. I've had this experience with the 105 previously. It sees stuff I never see. I think this is so cool. The lens, not the photo. I'm sure lots of us have had the same experience. Any stories and photos of the unexpected ? BJ
Image
Thanks for your input. I hope I can be as good as you one day.
Love this photo and I love all your photos. The colors are always so nice. Awesome!!!!!!
Thank you. I wish I could reciprocate, but I really don't care for the PP technique you use for a lot of your pix (like the one of the lake above). As with a lot of techniques (HDR, tilt/shift, the 'retro look', etc), the pix look good - or, at least, interesting - the first time you see them. The second and third time too. But the pleasure recedes as the novelty wears off. Now I see your pix and the first thing that registers is the 'look' you give them: the 'curly' foliage, etc. It makes the pix two-dimensional, like 'painting by numbers', destroying the (illusion of) depth. But I understand that this is how you like them to look, so it's a matter of personal taste, I suppose.![]()
My response looked a bit sour. Sorry. But you have a capable and sophisticated camera, and appear to live in a fascinating place. Ruler-straight horizons represent both a challenge and an opportunity. Geometric fields, big skies, straight roads, etc. You get a sunrise and a sunset every day of the year, and the light is always changing.
Thank you. I wish I could reciprocate, but I really don't care for the PP technique you use for a lot of your pix (like the one of the lake above). As with a lot of techniques (HDR, tilt/shift, the 'retro look', etc), the pix look good - or, at least, interesting - the first time you see them. The second and third time too. But the pleasure recedes as the novelty wears off. Now I see your pix and the first thing that registers is the 'look' you give them: the 'curly' foliage, etc. It makes the pix two-dimensional, like 'painting by numbers', destroying the (illusion of) depth. But I understand that this is how you like them to look, so it's a matter of personal taste, I suppose.![]()
I love that painterly look. Lovely colors![]()
At first I taught maybe croping out the left part before the deck, to balance things out with the yellow tree on the right, but on second look, the benchs / tables take care of the balancing act, so its perfect the way it is![]()