The article clearly says he said that there “was not enough time to change Apollo's business model and make the necessary updates to accommodate the fees”.A single developer and you act like $20 million is a drop in the bucket for someone to pay each year. Even if he had to raise the rates by an obscene amount to compensate. People will complain and say it is to much making it not worth it even being as good as it is. Damned if you do and damned if you don’t scenario. Apollo is riding into the sunset. That being said, deleted the app and Reddit account never to come back on Reddit. It’s doing a good job of self implosion atm any ways. I did buy a Pixel Pals yearly subscription to support development and I do enjoy the app itself.
If the fees are too much as you say they are then why didn’t he just say that? So the question I asked is valid. If there wasn’t enough time for a smooth transition and he had to shut it down why not take the time to make the changes then bring it back to market again?
If he doesn’t think he’d make enough back after going that route to justify the hassle that’s fine but he hasn’t come out and said that. You’re inferring that and you might be right but it could also be that the whole move left a bad taste in his mouth and he doesn’t want to deal with a company willing to change the rules of the game like that again in the future. So which is it? That’s all I was asking.
This isn’t criticism of the developer who clearly tried to negotiate the transition in good faith. This is clearly on Reddit but the original question stands.
Last edited by a moderator: