Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Screw him. He's breaking warranty and makes enough money from ads.

The whiner isn't even the PC expert he pretends to be. Back when we were adding an FPU to our 68030s and 386s this guy was probably 2 years old and couldn't pee on his own. Anyone can make the same videos as he does.

Don't send him any Macs to review.

I'm not sure if you watched the video, but he wasn't "sent" a mac product to review. He bought it, retail. He also told Apple he is ready/willing to pay for repairs because it was their fault (they admit) and it isn't covered by warranty. The problem is that Apple has a certification requirement, but no one is certified to fix it. They can't get the parts sent or even fix it themselves. Apple may not even have a repair instruction to do this work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regime2008
"I can just as easily whack the electronics in my Mac Pro as I can an iMac Pro."

Nope. Not just as easily with good design. Not saying it's impossible. It certainly is easy enough to do stupid intentional actions trying to cause ESD failure/degradation. But it can certainly be designed to mitigate with user accessibility in mind. Education is your friend.


"If you can't see that then it is you, I suggest, who needs an education in ESD."

Nice try. Being a hardware design engineer, I certainly know the difference.
Yep, there's nothing about the Mac Pro which would prevent me from whacking it with ESD. Period. An arc of high voltage electricity can easily hit any of the electronics which are exposed after removing the outer casing. Period.
 
This is just marketing. He is known for dropping things in his videos and at events. This is intentional.
 
Then what's the point of selling a product if you can't service it?

Doesn't matter what excuse you make for Apple. This is EMBARRASSING. So glad I pulled out of Apple and built a Hackintosh.


They can service it.
They copy the contents of the HD over to a new machine and their machine has been 'services' for all intensive purposes under the Warranty.

Not Apples fault some no talent ass-clown decided to void his warranty.
 
I would be thrilled if my car dealer refused to service cars that were broken by idiots taking them apart, because I hate that it takes several weeks to get an appointment at the Tesla dealer for service and servicing idiots like that can only make the delays worse.


I tried to hit the “tool” button, but it doesn’t work properly.

Name dropping....Tesla....lol.
 
Yep, there's nothing about the Mac Pro which would prevent me from whacking it with ESD. Period. An arc of high voltage electricity can easily hit any of the electronics which are exposed after removing the outer casing. Period.


As I said: "It certainly is easy enough to do stupid intentional actions trying to cause ESD failure/degradation."
 
This is a horrible policy from Apple. Even if damage is the user’s fault, they should be willing to repair their products as long as the customer pays for it. Imagine if your car dealership refused to fix your car simply because you had opened the hood to replace an air filter and somehow caused damage. With this policy Apple is saying ‘screw you. enjoy your $5,000 paperweight’. Ridiculous...


Umm no, air filters are a consumable and replaceable part and replacing it does not violate warranties. this would be more like taking your entire engine apart - which would be violating all warranties ,then shorting out the battery and alternator, snapping hoses and belts and breaking valves, and then piecing it back together and staring up the engine with no fluids destroying the cylinders and radiator - and then expecting the dealer to just fix it. They won’t or if they did it would cost you more than just buying a new car.

If you only broke the screen Apple would fix it, - at your expense - even if you broke it intentionally, because that is just one part, but they won’t fix a machine that was completely dismantled, stripped apart and broken up with numerous sensitive parts broken and shorted out, all the guts need to be replaced because who knows what else this idiot did when shorting out the machine!
 
Again, on reddit the meme is Linus dropping things during review... Google ‘Linus drop’ ;)
 
For all the people who side with Apple, please watch this video for some insight on Apple's stance on repair's.



There is a HUGE difference between repairing a machine that breaks under normal use and repairing a machine that one deliberately breaks and dismantles destroying internal components in the process.
 
Do you think every Apple Store has the ability to repair any damage you cause? They are set up to fix dead hard drives, or other part failures. They're not going to be able to fix damage done by a sledgehammer. They're not an auto body shop.
That's not how computers work. They should have, or be able to order, every single component in a computer. Why? They make the things. They have factories that have piles of these parts waiting to make it into actual iMac Pros, all they have to do is manufacture a few extra for repairs, and get them to any Apple Store that needs them. There is no excuse to be unable or unwilling to repair your own product, I don't care who the company is.

There is a HUGE difference between repairing a machine that breaks under normal use and repairing a machine that one deliberately breaks and dismantles destroying internal components in the process.

No, there literally is no difference. If a part is damaged, you replace it. That's the same whether the computer breaks under normal use, or is broken deliberately. The screen's broken? You replace it. The harddrive's broken? You replace that too. The only thing you can say is that it shouldn't be covered under warranty, which wasn't an issue here as he was completely willing to pay for it in full.
 
They can service it.
They copy the contents of the HD over to a new machine and their machine has been 'services' for all intensive purposes under the Warranty.

Not Apples fault some no talent ass-clown decided to void his warranty.
He's not attempting to obtain warranty work. He's been very clear the damage was self inflicted and he's willing to pay for it.
[doublepost=1524102024][/doublepost]
As I said: "It certainly is easy enough to do stupid intentional actions trying to cause ESD failure/degradation."
It doesn't have to be intentional.

EDIT: Maybe you'll find this helpful:

Touch the metal enclosure on the outside of the Mac Pro to discharge any static electricity.
Important: Always discharge static before you touch parts or install components inside your Mac Pro. To avoid generating static, don't move around the room until you finish installing the flash storage device and slide the enclosure back onto the computer.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202881
[doublepost=1524102095][/doublepost]
Umm no, air filters are a consumable and replaceable part and replacing it does not violate warranties. this would be more like taking your entire engine apart - which would be violating all warranties ,then shorting out the battery and alternator, snapping hoses and belts and breaking valves, and then piecing it back together and staring up the engine with no fluids destroying the cylinders and radiator - and then expecting the dealer to just fix it. They won’t or if they did it would cost you more than just buying a new car.

If you only broke the screen Apple would fix it, - at your expense - even if you broke it intentionally, because that is just one part, but they won’t fix a machine that was completely dismantled, stripped apart and broken up with numerous sensitive parts broken and shorted out, all the guts need to be replaced because who knows what else this idiot did when shorting out the machine!
Stop with the whole warranty arguments. Nothing about this issue is speaking to warranty work.
[doublepost=1524102139][/doublepost]
There is a HUGE difference between repairing a machine that breaks under normal use and repairing a machine that one deliberately breaks and dismantles destroying internal components in the process.
Did he deliberately break it? I haven't seen anything to support such a claim.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CE3 and Regime2008
It's because he's not a Mac guy. The disrespect from the forum members here is as petty as Apple denying a customer to pay for a repair.

PATHETIC.
These sorts of stories always bring out the sorts of people who seriously make me wish I could switch to Linux and be done with this terrible community. I'm sure I'll get a few "Well don't let the door hit you on the way out" posts in response to this as well, further proving my point. Or perhaps I won't get them now that I pointed out the likelihood of getting them. Who knows.
 
Yes, it is quite irrelevant. I can just as easily whack the electronics in my Mac Pro as I can an iMac Pro. There is zero difference. If you can't see that then it is you, I suggest, who needs an education in ESD.
[doublepost=1524100658][/doublepost]
Why can't they know if he damaged other things in his tear down? Regardless if he brought it in for a damaged screen and they replace the screen that's the only work that would be warranted. If the logic board fails later on then he'll have to pay for it.
Not how the law works in general:

Disclaimer or Modification of Implied Warranties
The Act prohibits anyone who offers a written warranty from disclaiming or modifying implied warranties. This means that no matter how broad or narrow your written warranty is, your customers always will receive the basic protection of the implied warranty of merchantability.


If Apple takes his money for repairing his computer, and returns his computer to him, they cant really limit the warranty of their work for “repairing” the computer. It is reasonable for Apple to be held accountable because they cannot nullify a reasonably implied warranty. He could say Apple’s repair caused the fault. There is simply no win for Apple to repair it. This wasn’t an accident. And he created evidence to that fact. So Apple is released by law from any requirement to provide repairs or service. This is a no-brainer for Apple. If they “fix” it, they are setting themselves up for an issue later on. It would be absolutely bad business to provide a repair, even out of original warranty to a willfully damaged and voided computer/warranty.
 
........... Not sure why people are having such a difficult time understanding the issue. If you haven't bothered to understand the concern then you should refrain from commenting.

Wow, if i were really Bender from Futurama, I would say "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass" but i'm not so i won't.

;-)
 
Not how the law works in general:

Disclaimer or Modification of Implied Warranties
The Act prohibits anyone who offers a written warranty from disclaiming or modifying implied warranties. This means that no matter how broad or narrow your written warranty is, your customers always will receive the basic protection of the implied warranty of merchantability.


If Apple takes his money for repairing his computer, and returns his computer to him, they cant really limit the warranty of their work for “repairing” the computer. It is reasonable for Apple to be held accountable because they cannot nullify a reasonably implied warranty. He could say Apple’s repair caused the fault. There is simply no win for Apple to repair it. This wasn’t an accident. And he created evidence to that fact. So Apple is released by law from any requirement to provide repairs or service. This is a no-brainer for Apple. If they “fix” it, they are setting themselves up for an issue later on. It would be absolutely bad business to provide a repair, even out of original warranty to a willfully damaged and voided computer/warranty.
Sure they can because they're warrantying the work they performed. If they only replace a screen then that's the work that receives warranty.

EDIT:

A replacement part or Apple Product, including a user-installable part that has been installed in accordance with instructions provided by Apple, assumes the remaining term of the Warranty or ninety (90) days from the date of replacement or repair, whichever provides longer coverage for you.

https://www.apple.com/legal/warranty/products/embedded-mac-warranty-us.html

[doublepost=1524102451][/doublepost]
Wow, if i were really Bender from Futurama, I would say "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass" but i'm not so i won't.

;-)
But you did :)
 
Last edited:
There is a HUGE difference between repairing a machine that breaks under normal use and repairing a machine that one deliberately breaks and dismantles destroying internal components in the process.
A repair is a repair. I'm pretty sure the majority of car accidents aren't on purpose, yet many get be repaired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pl1984
On one side, they knowingly took apart the iMac Pro (voiding warranty) but on the other end, 3rd party repair shops should have access to the parts as necessary for these rare incidents so that customers can pay for out of warranty repairs.

Also, 1.4 million views in less than 24 hours. Regardless of Linus's right/wrongness, this is a text book PR nightmare.

People watching this getting upset aren't the people buying iMac Pro's. This is a non-event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Average Pro
Sure they can because they're warrantying the work they performed. If they only replace a screen then that's the work that receives warranty.
[doublepost=1524102451][/doublepost]
No, because the screen is integral to the computer, and he could claim that Apple’s repair of the screen led to failure of another component. And Apple cannot waive that implied part of the service, if you read the whole post. Apple has zero risk to refuse repair. Whether or not you understand the risk Apple assumes by agreeing to repair the computer, doesn’t change that risk. No matter how small the risk is. They have no obligation to assume any risk. And intelligently, they refuse to assume that risk.
 
How about your mobile phone? Could you disassemble it, damage one of the modules, send the modules back in a box, and expect to get the factory to repair the device for a repair fee - inside or outside of warranty? And expect the repairs to be warranted for 90 days?

Yes.
 
He will probably use credit card insurence to cover the out warrenty repair anyway so he doesn't care about the cost. As this is too new, too rare and too complex, also rarely breaks, Apple doesn't have a lot of technical support is reasonable from a business logistics point of view. Most Mac Pros and iMacs are manufacture engineered by firms in China, so there is a delay to get service team trained. When you order high price Apple devices online, they are sent directly from China. Even the larger capacity iPad Pros. In his case it's cheaper to get a out-warrenty replacement.
 
No, because the screen is integral to the computer, and he could claim that Apple’s repair of the screen led to failure of another component. And Apple cannot waive that implied part of the service, if you read the whole post. Apple has zero risk to refuse repair. Whether or not you understand the risk Apple assumes by agreeing to repair the computer, doesn’t change that risk. No matter how small the risk is. They have no obligation to assume any risk. And intelligently, they refuse to assume that risk.
See the edit in my previous post.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.