Semantics. Sorry. Ummmm, rendered a $5,000 top of-the-line computer into something that no-long works with a shattered screen and a fully voided warranty, with no re-sale value and can be outperformed by an abacus. Perhaps you should buy it? What would you pay for his Pro? But no, it was not destroyed in the literal sense. I will be more precise for you in the future.[doublepost=1524104704][/doublepost]
How did he destroy it? I saw that he damaged it but I didn't see where he destroyed it. Was that at the end of the video (admittedly I didn't watch the last few minutes)?
Yes, a strawman. You've been arguing an absolute when I made no absolute statement.
Now that I've dealt with your strawman how about dealing with the information I provided by Apple? Here's some additional information for your reading pleasure:
To minimize the possibility of damage to the computer components due to static discharge, it's important to wear an antistatic wrist strap while you work with your computer's memory.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205041
Apple, unlike yourself, understands the risk of ESD even for systems which are intended to be upgraded by end users.
It's not semantics. What if he didn't open it and it got knocked over and the screen shattered? Would you say he should just suck it up?Semantics. Sorry. Ummmm, rendered a $5,000 top of-the-line computer into something that no-long works with a shattered screen and a fully voided warranty, with no re-sale value and can be outperformed by an abacus. Perhaps you should buy it? What would you pay for his Pro? But no, it was not destroyed in the literal sense. I will be more precise for you in the future.
top of-the-line computer
Then you know it can damage electronics in devices which are user serviceable just as easily as those not intended to be user servicable. No intent necessary. That's why Apple speaks to it in their supporting documentation. Here's a third example:Are you serious? As a hardware engineer with many designs under my belt I fully understand the risks of ESD. How about you? You still do not understand the ESD mechanism that manufacturers do not want to be responsible for when people open devices that are not meant to be opened and worked on by end users.
Does anybody not know a wrist strap should be worn when working on them? Is that news to you? Too funny.
It's not semantics. What if he didn't open it and it got knocked over and the screen shattered? Would you say he should just suck it up?
It's not semantics. What if he didn't open it and it got knocked over and the screen shattered? Would you say he should just suck it up?
My “semantics” remark is clearly regarding your “how did he destroy it” “was it at the end of the video?” response to my saying he destroyed his iMac Pro.It's not semantics. What if he didn't open it and it got knocked over and the screen shattered? Would you say he should just suck it up?
Weird how my local Costco sells Apple computers.
The only damage I saw, and I admit I didn't watch the entire video, was a damaged screen. Are there other issues?I don't think we'd be having this discussion if the screen was the issue.
Then you know it can damage electronics in devices which are user serviceable just as easily as non user serviceable devices. No intent necessary. That's why Apple speaks to it in their supporting documentation. Here's a third example:
Touch a metal surface inside the computer to discharge any static electricity from your body.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201165
Your argument about ESD is nothing more than a desperate attempt to rationalize Apple's behavior.
OK...and? What about the scenario I presented to you? Should the end user just suck it up?My “semantics” remark is clearly regarding your “how did he destroy it” “was it at the end of the video?” response to my saying he destroyed his iMac Pro.
Fist'em in a court, Linus!
The only damage I saw, and I admit I didn't watch the entire video, was a damaged screen. Are there other issues?
Doesn't the iMac Pro use the same display as the other 5K iMacs? Why would those displays be hard to find?
Apparently Apple doesn't design their systems properly then. Because their documentation says things which imply it's easy to build up static electricity. Things such as the following:"Touch a metal surface inside the computer to discharge any static electricity from your body."
Really? That's news to you?
"Then you know it can damage electronics in devices which are user serviceable just as easily as non user serviceable devices."
Not true. As I said before, devices that are intended to be serviceable by customers are less sensitive to ESD if designed properly. Also, since they are intended to be opened and serviced by end users, Apple publishes ESD information that users should pay attention to.
Similarly, devices that are sealed and not intended to be serviced by end users, will not have the benefit of Apple's ESD guidelines associated with those products.
If true it'd probably be less expensive to buy a replacement.It needs a new logic board and power supply unit. I don't think that happened because of a drop.
Doesn't the iMac Pro use the same display as the other 5K iMacs? Why would those displays be hard to find?
This is a horrible policy from Apple. Even if damage is the user’s fault, they should be willing to repair their products as long as the customer pays for it. Imagine if your car dealership refused to fix your car simply because you had opened the hood to replace an air filter and somehow caused damage. With this policy Apple is saying ‘screw you. enjoy your $5,000 paperweight’. Ridiculous...
Apparently Apple doesn't design their systems properly then. Because their documentation says things which imply it's easy to build up static electricity. Things such as the following:
To avoid generating static, don't move around the room until you finish installing the cards, memory, or internal storage device and replace the side panel.
That suggests static electricity can easily build up and damage electronics. Given this was taken from the Mac Pro memory upgrade guide I think anyone can see user serviceable systems are just as susceptible to ESD as those not intended to be user servicable.
You're apologizing for Apple's behavior and you're using an appeal to authority argument (i.e. that authority being you). Just admit your argument was weak at best. I won't think anything less of your electrical engineering knowledge because of it.
[doublepost=1524106551][/doublepost]
If true it'd probably be less expensive to buy a replacement.
just letting you know, he's more used to pc builds... anyways to fix a mac, you need to send it to a certified dealer you can't just ask for the parts. they don't do thatif you think you're clever enough to open it up and modify it, you should be clever enough to fix it yourself
It needs a new logic board and power supply unit. I don't think that happened because of a drop.