Linus is one of the most annoying YT'ers out there
No that would be Austin Evans.
Linus is one of the most annoying YT'ers out there
Its not about being able to buy another one, it’s about the fact that this has happened and frankly, it’s unacceptable. Now if the parts are able to be sourced and it’s able to be fixed by a third party, then it’s not as big of a deal as it would be.He is a fool
[doublepost=1524071918][/doublepost]He has more money than sense he can just buy another one its all for views
I’m sure other replies will echo your sentiments.....I can' be bothered with reading the article but I'm sure he's 100% wrong and hes trying to rob Apple.
Can probs close the thread now... any more replies will just echo my sentiments...
cause apple can't do anything wrong for some people on this forum. it's so sad. just pure apple love and not one bit of common senseWhat is it with everyone failing to understand that he is not expecting to get this repaired under warranty and fully upfront with his asking to pay for the repair himself?
This is true.if you think you're clever enough to open it up and modify it, you should be clever enough to fix it yourself
There’s something about this guy I really don’t like. I get major douche vibes from him and he seems overly obnoxious.
I don't think there is anything wrong with the policy... why should Apple expend the resources to repair something that was broken (taken apart) on purpose by an uncertified person. If it was broken in the box or Apple was negligent, then I would fully support the complaint. He, however; made the choice to take it part knowing full well the risk(s). Apple is not alone in their policy... maybe he should have bought stupidity insurance of get his show to buy him a new computer...
Great policy that forces one to buy a new computer. I don't buy the excuses in the article. Sell replacement parts and let a 3rd party fix it if Apple is not interested. Anyone that thinks my way should visit http://repair.org.
Macs, such as iMac, MacBooks, etc.? Or the iOs devices?
Because there's no telling what kind of damage is done to the internals once opened by someone unauthorized.If the customer is willing to pay out of warranty repair costs (as is the case in this story), why does it matter if the damage was accidental while the case is open or closed? In other words, what is the difference between spilling coffee on a iMac pro with the case unopened and with the case open?
Sometimes, when you break something, you just have to suck it up and buy the thing again.
if you think you're clever enough to open it up and modify it, you should be clever enough to fix it yourself
He is willing to pay for all parts that are needed. No one will sell him those.Because there's no telling what kind of damage is done to the internals once opened by someone unauthorized.
So… you buy a new car from a dealer… you decide to turn it into a low-rider at your cousin’s shop… after a few months you’re tired of it and get it back to “normal” with genuine parts that your cousin somehow was able to get hold of… the next day the brakes fail and you die hitting a wall at 50miles/hr. Who’s responsible?
So is Apple refusing to repair it at all, or merely refusing to repair it under the terms of the 1-year warranty or AppleCare he may have purchased?
The former seems odd, as I would assume they would simply charge him for the work. The latter seems completely reasonable, as why should Apple repair this damage free of charge when it was caused by the user disassembling the product (which is against the terms of service).