Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hp, acer, dell, Microsoft, etc build and service their computers.



Have you seen the ram sticks the iMac Pro uses? You think that’s laptop ram? Come on now. Also, how do you know the long term effects of using x component over y component in this machine? I get that the ram meets a standard, but not all ram sticks are equal or the same.

I never said that other ram won’t work. In fact, I said the opposite of that. It would be really nice if you read what I wrote instead of ranting on about something I never said. Someone earlier said that it could be for thinness, but the regular 27” iMac is just as thin and if Apple were being a mean old Scrooge then they could have simply soldered the ram in place.

You basically whine about the thing being thin and in the same response call Apple lazy when making machines thin is really hard to do in comparison to just making it a box like everyone else. There’s plenty of use case for a thin computer that’s out of the users way. Apple’s Not the only company that’s been dabbling in making thin machines.



5400 rpm? Can’t switch audio output? What are you on about? The iMac Pro uses twin SSDs in raid0. When I pull my headphones out of the headphone jack, my audio switches to the speakers. Sorry but I find Macs to be very usable.
i mean you don't have to pull out headphone.. just switch.. easy
I said mac.. which mean i have i used mac mini and imac for now.. not using imac pro.. read carefully sir.
5400 is mention for base model mac mini in 2018 and imac.. Don't said about quality because they sell premium 5400 rpm in base model or fusion.It is a joke of century
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regime2008
Hp, acer, dell, Microsoft, etc build and service their computers.

But their parts are interchangeable. You don’t have to buy dell parts in a dell. But you are right, Microsoft is moving in that direction now, as are other companies. If we don’t stand up against it now it will become so common no one will think it is wrong. Which, again, it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spronkey
Apple doesn’t actually get to make the rules regarding repairs. There are laws that cover that. They can discourage it, but they can’t forbid it.

Apple should have to support the work done by outside people. Period. Why spend all that money on an iMac Pro and then take it apart for no good reason other than to show off? That was very stupid. The laws are WRONG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sc0rp
Apple should have to support the work done by outside people. Period. Why spend all that money on an iMac Pro and then take it apart for no good reason other than to show off? That was very stupid. The laws are WRONG.
I think your first sentence is wrong. Missing a “not.”
 
i mean you don't have to pull out headphone.. just switch.. easy
I said mac.. which mean i have i used mac mini and imac for now.. not using imac pro.. read carefully sir.
5400 is mention for base model mac mini in 2018 and imac.. Don't said about quality because they sell premium 5400 rpm in base model or fusion.It is a joke of century

You’re buying an entry level mini computer. How’s that supposed to be premium? I mean, yeah, I get it, 5200 rpm. ;ersonally, I think Apple should make all of their computers SSD standard. TOTALLY get it, but I’ve never considered a mini to be premium. Apple sorta skews their pricing so the entry level is really not a good deal and you only see nice deals on the very high-end for what they are. I’d be super onboard with Apple using SSD in all of their machines. I also think they should give more ram as a standard. People complain about an inability to upgrade ram? Ok, have 32, 64, 128gb of ram soldered to the logicboard and solid state drives. Apple ][ Forever.

But their parts are interchangeable. You don’t have to buy dell parts in a dell. But you are right, Microsoft is moving in that direction now, as are other companies. If we don’t stand up against it now it will become so common no one will think it is wrong. Which, again, it is.

Mmmm, I don’t really see much of a problem. Maybe it’s because I was using Macs back before the ppc days. If you owned a Mac before the mid 2000’s it was hard (nearly impossible) to get parts or upgrades other than finding an old Mac at a thrift store or something and cannibalizing that to fix what you have and Mac users had to hide their faces when oc overseers were roaming about. The only other option back in the day was to get a third party to repair your machine and you were totally on your own. Any John’s toolbelt could set up shop and make you pay through the nose to restore your beloved (yet “peak crappy” all the same) powermac 5260. So everyone sounds like a huge whiner to me when it comes to repairs or how Macs are built. Most Mac users today came aboard when Apple became cool and hip. They don’t know real struggle or real sorrow. Only people that had it worse were probably Amiga owners.

To me, as long as it works and I have the option to get a 3-year guarantee then I’m super cool buying anything that suits my needs. I’m not concerned with it being a closed system as long as it gives me everything I need already and it’s stable and keeps the failure rate below 20%. I own an iPad Pro and I freaking use it for most of my communications needs as well as some work. I’m not even thinking about fixing it or worried about it breaking down.

Apple should have to support the work done by outside people. Period. Why spend all that money on an iMac Pro and then take it apart for no good reason other than to show off? That was very stupid. The laws are WRONG.

There are NO laws that compell or force a manufacturer to service a product that a consumer broke themselves. I don’t know what 4jasontv is talking about, but he’s wrong if he thinks Apple can be legally compelled fix linuses iMac Pro. If he’s talking about right to repair laws that haven’t passed yet, then all something like that would do is compel Apple to sell their parts but they can sell the parts at prices that would make it economically more viable to just buy a new machine but not a complete wash if you break a component on your machine. They can also lock down their platform to the point that you’ll never see bootlegs or clones, which is really what I think this is all about. People have been trying for years to force Apple to allow clones again (which nearly killed Apple in the 90’s) or get easy bootleg Macs. That’s what the hacintosh scene was all about.
 
How’s that supposed to be premium?

For me
1. Usability no aesthetic. Before yeah, apple is small company but now they need to hired more resources on usability .

2. If the operating system not supported the ram/speed usage, just don't sell it .Don't care it was upgradable ram or soldered ram.

3. Windows don't have ability to switch services. E.g if you just do video editing, why does you need apache / mysql service in the background ? Ram usage is mac is pretty bad. Nowadays developer are to pamper with the term "If the ram not use, it worthless". ** one day facebook page use my ram till 40 GB . So everything is in swap mode. ? It crazy..

4. 4 TB in imac pro is premium 256 GB SSD ain't premium should at least a basic in 2018 .
5. If you compare y brand x brand and apple brand.. Yeah it premium brand but at least come at least premium equipment to support the brand.
 
To me, as long as it works and I have the option to get a 3-year guarantee then I’m super cool buying anything that suits my needs.

That's valid, but my experience has led to the expectation of at least 6 years. My main mac is a 2009 Macbook Pro. I just replaced my iPad 2 with a 10.5 iPad Pro. So, while I don't doubt it will last (I have no reason to) I worry about restrictions Apple places on the devices. The only reason my MacBook is still usable is because I can replace the battery, hard drive, and RAM on my own. Thank goodness macOS hasn't changed much because I am stuck on 10.11.6. There really hasn't been a core feature that has motivated me to replace my device. I shouldn't have to predict what the industry will expect of my device in a decade. I should be able to update it as needed. People like Linus, like them or not, make the general public aware of this issue. To be fair to him, he is very generous when he reviews Apple's products compared to other vendors he reviews.
[doublepost=1524669701][/doublepost]
There are NO laws that compell or force a manufacturer to service a product that a consumer broke themselves. I don’t know what 4jasontv is talking about, but he’s wrong if he thinks Apple can be legally compelled fix linuses iMac Pro.

1. This isn't occurring under US law.
2. The customer always breaks it.
3. When Apple entered the repair market, and forced all repair centers to go through them to do repairs, they became obligated to make the parts available else they are using their market dominance to control the repair industry. They are NOT the same as the regular PC industry because they modify parts to prevent them from be compatible with other PC manufacturers.
 
The moral of the story is that if it isn't covered by warranty get approval FIRST rather than blow up your device and then after the fact beg that they replace it.

You have to remember Linus's show is profitable on YouTube. Do they just review the Mac Pro in-use or also try to expand their profit and do a break-down video too?

It's not a bad decision. I'm sure Linus's crew didn't think they would damage it, since they are so used to breakdowns on the show. These guys make money, and were willing to pay full price for repair.
 
You have to remember Linus's show is profitable on YouTube. Do they just review the Mac Pro in-use or also try to expand their profit and do a break-down video too?

It's not a bad decision. I'm sure Linus's crew didn't think they would damage it, since they are so used to breakdowns on the show. These guys make money, and were willing to pay full price for repair.

So why make such a big deal out of it that it rises to the level of being a story on the macrumors page. They should have just accepted that they screwed up and moved on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 762999
So why make such a big deal out of it that it rises to the level of being a story on the macrumors page. They should have just accepted that they screwed up and moved on.

He made a big deal because an Apple agent seemed pretty genuine in looking to help him get it repaired it for full cost, so they turned it in to the Genius Bar. Then they got surprised they were going to pickup a rejected repair.

It's basically the customer service standpoint, and how they can't even go to a Apple 3rd-party dealer to get it done either.
 
He made a big deal because an Apple agent seemed pretty genuine in looking to help him get it repaired it for full cost, so they turned it in to the Genius Bar. Then they got surprised they were going to pickup a rejected repair.

It's basically the customer service standpoint, and how they can't even go to a Apple 3rd-party dealer to get it done either.

They can, if a third party is willing to do it. They have been certified since january and have had the parts since the beginning of march.

However, when damage is caused by opening the computer, a lot of third parties will not want to do the work and will make excuses to avoid it - if something goes wrong in the future because the guys opened the machine they don't want to be held responsible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adnbek
They can, if a third party is willing to do it. They have been certified since january and have had the parts since the beginning of march.

However, when damage is caused by opening the computer, a lot of third parties will not want to do the work and will make excuses to avoid it - if something goes wrong in the future because the guys opened the machine they don't want to be held responsible.

Yep, I think he only went to one 3rd party.

Like if Steve Wozniak broke an iMac Pro he opened, you'd think anyone would deny a repair?

I'm sure if one knew his channel is Linus Tech Tips, and how popular his show has been for years, it would be a no-brainer to do the job. Unfortunately some policies, and to some degree Linus's techie that broke that iMac Pro did some serious damage beyond just a screen.
 
For me
1. Usability no aesthetic. Before yeah, apple is small company but now they need to hired more resources on usability .

2. If the operating system not supported the ram/speed usage, just don't sell it .Don't care it was upgradable ram or soldered ram.

3. Windows don't have ability to switch services. E.g if you just do video editing, why does you need apache / mysql service in the background ? Ram usage is mac is pretty bad. Nowadays developer are to pamper with the term "If the ram not use, it worthless". ** one day facebook page use my ram till 40 GB . So everything is in swap mode. ? It crazy..

4. 4 TB in imac pro is premium 256 GB SSD ain't premium should at least a basic in 2018 .
5. If you compare y brand x brand and apple brand.. Yeah it premium brand but at least come at least premium equipment to support the brand.

1) Hmm, I have a client that runs his entire printshop on a Mac mini. He hardly cares about whether the hard drive is whatever as long as the machine overall cuts down on downtime.
2) what?
3) no offense but, I take it that English isn’t your first language. It’s difficult to understand what you’re saying.
4) pci-based SSD as a standard in any computer right now is sort of premium and not expected. However, the iMac Pro starts at 1tb SSD, not 256, if that’s what you’re talking about.

That's valid, but my experience has led to the expectation of at least 6 years. My main mac is a 2009 Macbook Pro. I just replaced my iPad 2 with a 10.5 iPad Pro. So, while I don't doubt it will last (I have no reason to) I worry about restrictions Apple places on the devices. The only reason my MacBook is still usable is because I can replace the battery, hard drive, and RAM on my own. Thank goodness macOS hasn't changed much because I am stuck on 10.11.6. There really hasn't been a core feature that has motivated me to replace my device. I shouldn't have to predict what the industry will expect of my device in a decade. I should be able to update it as needed. People like Linus, like them or not, make the general public aware of this issue. To be fair to him, he is very generous when he reviews Apple's products compared to other vendors he reviews.
[doublepost=1524669701][/doublepost]

1. This isn't occurring under US law.
2. The customer always breaks it.
3. When Apple entered the repair market, and forced all repair centers to go through them to do repairs, they became obligated to make the parts available else they are using their market dominance to control the repair industry. They are NOT the same as the regular PC industry because they modify parts to prevent them from be compatible with other PC manufacturers.


People like Linus sensationalize to an ignorant audience and frankly he pulled some serious straight up BS in his video. If he said those things about me in a video like that, I would sue him for slander. I mean seriously, so much of his video was misleading to the point that he’d say one thing while showing different on the screen. On the screen. It would say that Apple won’t service his machine if he tampered with it and break it but he should bring it in for inspection so they can tell him what his options were. He claims that he was expecting Apple to get his Mac up in a jiffy, yet there’s no hint if anyone giving him a price estimate for the parts and labor. He claims that Apple wouldn’t/couldn’t send the parts to the Apple store but the conversation that he shows on screen has nothing to do with Apple HQ not sending parts to the Apple store at all. It was about what would happen if a third party can’t get parts after the Apple rep told him to ask a third party and they can tell him what they can do for him. He claimed in his video that training and certs to work on the iMac Pro don’t exist and ‘Apple pro’ certification is needed to order the parts, which doesn’t sound like any Apple certification naming scheme that I’ve Ever heard of. He spends the entire video tiptoeing around the fact that his employee exposed his logicboard and PSU to electrical damage and he’ll likely have to simply buy a replacement machine because his employee, acting under his authority, screwed up. It sucks but that’s how it is.

Also, I recall reading somewhere that you can manipulate your laptop to run a newer version of osx than El Capitan... but why would you want to? If I had my choice, I’d go all the way back to snow leopard on my obsolete going vintage MacBook. Running the newest os would just slow it down and, to be honest, I’ll also be cutting myself off from older software. For instance, Bryce doesn’t work in high Sierra. I would LOVE to buy an old iPad 4 if it has a version of iOS before iOS 9 that’ll Run all my old games that the original devs no longer support. You know, mass effect: infiltrator, deadspace (never finished), NOVA 3 (which I never finished) and so on. Upgrading to the latest version isn’t always the best idea.

1) no law that I’m aware of in the world compels a company to service an out of warranty device that the consumer broke themselves and it is held, as far as I can tell, that revoking your warranty because you objectively broke something, is a universally accepted practice. Otherwise, why even go into business if you have to give everyone lifetime service guarantees even in cases of monumental user screwups or acts of god?
2) hmm, when I had my iMac serviced, under my free year of AppleCare, Apple didn’t tell me that I broke it. They just fixed it, for free, and gave me back my iMac.
3) Apple makes the parts available to AASPs. From where I’m sitting, they have a right to make their parts anyway they choose and you have a right to not buy their products. Apple doesn’t owe you, me or anybody anything unless we have a warranty or a certification. As a pragmatic, I see Apple as a company that’s trying to protect themselves legally and from potential bootleggers. As a pragmatic, it’s unreasonable to ask someone to compromise themselves against their own nature or in detriment to what they view as their own survival. If you don’t like Apple or the way Apple does things then don’t whine about it, simply don’t buy their products. Go buy something else. That’s the best way to go about it.

If I were to break my XBONE, I’d have to go through Microsoft or an authorized service provider to get it repaired. If they let the market be flooded with shiny new XBONE and XBONE X parts then they’ll lose control of their platform and lose the ability to conduct themselves as a business and innovate. It’s part of the reason why Microsoft will never share the source code to their software or why Sony will never release their first party exclusives for another platform. They’d lose control of their product and will cease functioning and existing as a business.
 
1) Hmm, I have a client that runs his entire printshop on a Mac mini. He hardly cares about whether the hard drive is whatever as long as the machine overall cuts down on downtime.
2) what?
3) no offense but, I take it that English isn’t your first language. It’s difficult to understand what you’re saying.
4) pci-based SSD as a standard in any computer right now is sort of premium and not expected. However, the iMac Pro starts at 1tb SSD, not 256, if that’s what you’re talking about.




People like Linus sensationalize to an ignorant audience and frankly he pulled some serious straight up BS in his video. If he said those things about me in a video like that, I would sue him for slander. I mean seriously, so much of his video was misleading to the point that he’d say one thing while showing different on the screen. On the screen. It would say that Apple won’t service his machine if he tampered with it and break it but he should bring it in for inspection so they can tell him what his options were. He claims that he was expecting Apple to get his Mac up in a jiffy, yet there’s no hint if anyone giving him a price estimate for the parts and labor. He claims that Apple wouldn’t/couldn’t send the parts to the Apple store but the conversation that he shows on screen has nothing to do with Apple HQ not sending parts to the Apple store at all. It was about what would happen if a third party can’t get parts after the Apple rep told him to ask a third party and they can tell him what they can do for him. He claimed in his video that training and certs to work on the iMac Pro don’t exist and ‘Apple pro’ certification is needed to order the parts, which doesn’t sound like any Apple certification naming scheme that I’ve Ever heard of. He spends the entire video tiptoeing around the fact that his employee exposed his logicboard and PSU to electrical damage and he’ll likely have to simply buy a replacement machine because his employee, acting under his authority, screwed up. It sucks but that’s how it is.

Also, I recall reading somewhere that you can manipulate your laptop to run a newer version of osx than El Capitan... but why would you want to? If I had my choice, I’d go all the way back to snow leopard on my obsolete going vintage MacBook. Running the newest os would just slow it down and, to be honest, I’ll also be cutting myself off from older software. For instance, Bryce doesn’t work in high Sierra. I would LOVE to buy an old iPad 4 if it has a version of iOS before iOS 9 that’ll Run all my old games that the original devs no longer support. You know, mass effect: infiltrator, deadspace (never finished), NOVA 3 (which I never finished) and so on. Upgrading to the latest version isn’t always the best idea.

1) no law that I’m aware of in the world compels a company to service an out of warranty device that the consumer broke themselves and it is held, as far as I can tell, that revoking your warranty because you objectively broke something, is a universally accepted practice. Otherwise, why even go into business if you have to give everyone lifetime service guarantees even in cases of monumental user screwups or acts of god?
2) hmm, when I had my iMac serviced, under my free year of AppleCare, Apple didn’t tell me that I broke it. They just fixed it, for free, and gave me back my iMac.
3) Apple makes the parts available to AASPs. From where I’m sitting, they have a right to make their parts anyway they choose and you have a right to not buy their products. Apple doesn’t owe you, me or anybody anything unless we have a warranty or a certification. As a pragmatic, I see Apple as a company that’s trying to protect themselves legally and from potential bootleggers. As a pragmatic, it’s unreasonable to ask someone to compromise themselves against their own nature or in detriment to what they view as their own survival. If you don’t like Apple or the way Apple does things then don’t whine about it, simply don’t buy their products. Go buy something else. That’s the best way to go about it.

If I were to break my XBONE, I’d have to go through Microsoft or an authorized service provider to get it repaired. If they let the market be flooded with shiny new XBONE and XBONE X parts then they’ll lose control of their platform and lose the ability to conduct themselves as a business and innovate. It’s part of the reason why Microsoft will never share the source code to their software or why Sony will never release their first party exclusives for another platform. They’d lose control of their product and will cease functioning and existing as a business.
Except he is merely trying to order a part to repair himself (the screen, a part that I would imagine is commonly broken in accidents with a 24"+ monitor) and is being refused to get the part
 
3) Apple makes the parts available to AASPs. From where I’m sitting, they have a right to make their parts anyway they choose and you have a right to not buy their products.

Not if they want to compete in the repair business. Either, don't charge for repairs or let repair centers order parts without going through them. It's their choice to be in the repair business, but they shouldn't use their dominance in building the computers to influence repairs.
 
Not if they want to compete in the repair business. Either, don't charge for repairs or let repair centers order parts without going through them. It's their choice to be in the repair business, but they shouldn't use their dominance in building the computers to influence repairs.

why not? They don't have a monopoly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sc0rp
No they don't. That's not how markets are defined in antitrust law. Your argument is like saying McDonald's should have to sell hamburger buns to burger king.

That's not anything like what I am saying. Apple has multiple businesses they are involved in. They build computers. They repair computers. Using their building business to influence their repair business allows them to influence prices and have final say over who can continue to use their device vs those that have to purchase a new one. It's the very definition of antitrust.
 
Last edited:
Not if they want to compete in the repair business. Either, don't charge for repairs or let repair centers order parts without going through them. It's their choice to be in the repair business, but they shouldn't use their dominance in building the computers to influence repairs.

How do resellers like Macmall compete with Apple and afford to do things like knock $1000 of an iMac Pro? Repair shops should do what they do if they want to compete. Simple. I don’t know WHAT you want Apple to do or WHAT you think Apple is doing to stop AASPs from being competitive. As for non-certified shops, really screw them. Sorry, not sorry.

Except he is merely trying to order a part to repair himself (the screen, a part that I would imagine is commonly broken in accidents with a 24"+ monitor) and is being refused to get the part

Linus needs a display a logicboard and a PSU. Not only do I think Linus would want to pay for all three parts but Apple would have to give him a warranty for all three parts. Essentially a warranty for nearly an entire iMac Pro. They’d have to give a warranty to the guys that broke the iMac Pro to begin with. That’s a bag of hurt right there.

Not to mention liability if Linus and his workers manage to kill themselves while trying to fix the iMac Pro that they broke through sheer incompetence. And Linus wants to flip that on Craigslist? Laughably underhanded of Linus at best.

If Linus had AppleCare plus and didn’t violate his warranty then he’d have a working iMac Pro right now for almost nothing if it broke from a mere accident. As it stands, the parts alone would probably cost him about as much as buying a new iMac Pro. No amount of “sell me the parts!” Would change that.

That's not anything like what I am saying. Apple has multiple businesses they are involved in. They build computers. They repair computers. Using their building business to influence their repair business allows them to influence prices and have final say over who can continue to use their device vs those that have to purchase a new one. It's the very definition of antitrust.

Do other repair shops that aren’t owned by apple exist? If the answer is yes, then they don’t have a monopoly. Do other companies exist that make and sell computers without being owned by Apple? If the answer yes then they don’t have a monopoly.
[doublepost=1524680817][/doublepost]
Yep, I think he only went to one 3rd party.

Like if Steve Wozniak broke an iMac Pro he opened, you'd think anyone would deny a repair?

I'm sure if one knew his channel is Linus Tech Tips, and how popular his show has been for years, it would be a no-brainer to do the job. Unfortunately some policies, and to some degree Linus's techie that broke that iMac Pro did some serious damage beyond just a screen.

If Steve Wozniak opened and broke an iMac Pro, he’d probably buy a new one out of embarrassment or makeshift fix it himself without begging Apple to service it and whining when they say no. The man is like the Montgomery Scott of Apple. If he broke it through his own ignorance then that would be incredibly embarrassing for him.

It’s a big no-brainer to tell Linus that he’s on his own. Servicing his machine would be a huge liability for Apple and nobody’s thinking about how that obligates Apple or why it would be a bad idea for Apple to do it. Frankly, I don’t think Apple cares about Linus or his channel. I wouldn’t if I were a business on that level. Apple isn’t your buddy in a garage with a soldering iron. Touting his channel, which hardly had anything positive to say about Apple before this, is like a restaraunt caring about someone being a Yelper that has always openly criticized their food.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't the iMac Pro use the same display as the other 5K iMacs? Why would those displays be hard to find?

It is not about the display, he ruined a lot of internals and the power supply as well. So the repair might just be close to a new iMac.
 
It’s a big no-brainer to tell Linus that he’s on his own. Servicing his machine would be a huge liability for Apple and nobody’s thinking about how that obligates Apple or why it would be a bad idea for Apple to do it. Frankly, I don’t think Apple cares about Linus or his channel. I wouldn’t if I were a business on that level. Apple isn’t your buddy in a garage with a soldering iron. Touting his channel, which hardly had anything positive to say about Apple before this, is like a restaraunt caring about someone being a Yelper that has always openly criticized their food.

I think it would have been okay to charge Linus the full-cost of a repair. It would also send a message of how expensive this can be if you screw up. On the other hand they seriously damaged more than just the screen and it probably would cost close to a new iMac Pro anyway.

I'm pretty sure if they only just damaged the screen, they probably would have had no problem replacing that. It's the fact the damage is too high for liability, so they can just cite self-repair and deny.
 
I think it would have been okay to charge Linus the full-cost of a repair. It would also send a message of how expensive this can be if you screw up. On the other hand they seriously damaged more than just the screen and it probably would cost close to a new iMac Pro anyway.

I'm pretty sure if they only just damaged the screen, they probably would have had no problem replacing that. It's the fact the damage is too high for liability, so they can just cite self-repair and deny.

They should just say that taking the screen off voids the warranty.
 
I think it would have been okay to charge Linus the full-cost of a repair. It would also send a message of how expensive this can be if you screw up. On the other hand they seriously damaged more than just the screen and it probably would cost close to a new iMac Pro anyway.

I'm pretty sure if they only just damaged the screen, they probably would have had no problem replacing that. It's the fact the damage is too high for liability, so they can just cite self-repair and deny.


Yeah, I think it would have been alright to charge him the full price of a new iMac Pro and hand him a new iMac Pro before patting him on the head and sending him on his way.

As you say, If Linus had just damaged the screen, apple probably would have repaired that. Probably. It really cheeses them off when you open it up like that and turn an Apple box into a Pandora’s box. i say let’s wait and see what the new Mac Pro looks like.

Personally, I liked the classic Mac Pro before they made the trashcan. One thing I liked about Apple design is that they didn’t put pointless flair on their designs like some other manufacturers. I’m sort of spartan like that and don’t feel a need for faux air intakes and other silliness that I see in some pc manufacturers.

I hope the next iMac Pro looks like one of the robots from Interstellar or the perfectly smooth black monolith from 2001: a space odyssey. Maybe have the only outside flair be an Apple logo that lights up or something.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.