Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
One of the L.A. area gynos/plastic surgeons who post on these boards replies that he's getting a gold 911 to match his Watch Edition in 3...2....1.....
 
So Porsche doesn't want Google stealing its trade secrets? But isn't Apple supposedly working on a car as well? If that's true, then it wouldn't surprise me that one day an article surfaces which states that Apple's CarPlay collects data as well. Then Apple will dismiss it as a "bug", and patch it, just like the location issue on the iPhone a few years ago.

Privacy is one of Apples big selling point. They are not going to risk such a reputation by trying to spy on stuff like getting the extra car data.
 
This article is about their new 911 which is why I said 911 and not Porsche. :p
Funny thing, I'd be more inclined to believe the diesel theory than that hilarious secret sauce theory put forth by the author. It's way more plausible. One can reasonable assume Car Play will reach the entire Porsche lineup, including the diesel Cayenne. Had they chosen AA as well, Google would be privy to shady emissions if they existed. As for the secret sauce theory: Google can buy any number of Porsche cars and get the exact same data that's in the secret sauce. Basically I think Google wants more data on real world drivers so they can integrate further into the car systems. Porsche doesn't want that. Hell, if I was an auto maker I wouldn't want that either. Ceding control of the dash is one thing, giving up possible underlying systems is a "whole nother" thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: page404
I'm sure Paul Walker's demise and the litigation pending the safety of the Porsche he died in, has nothing to do with this decision.
 
Good for you Porsche. THIS is one of the reasons why I hate Google. Their ENTIRE business model is based on collecting information from every human being on what they do, where they go, what they look at, etc...

And given that Google is one of the wealthiest companies in the world, I'd say that we are apparently allowing Google to continue to invade our privacy. Sad really.... that so many people are nothing more than sheep... blind to what is really happening to them.
 
What if I told you Porche has the same owner as Volkswagen!, Bentley, Lamborghini, Skoda and a few more :)
 
Man I wish my car supported CarPlay. I have a fairly new car too. I wish I could update the software for it but I guess it hooks into steering wheel buttons and stuff? I have plenty of those though.
 
This is Porsche's call for company reasons:

"Porsche's reasoning behind the decision points to not wanting to share the information with Google that could include the ingredients to its "secret sauce that makes its cars special,""

And completely understandable.
That quote can't be attributed to Porsche. It's an "off the record comment" from the author. Secret sauce really doesn't seem like a phrase emanating from Stuttgart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CombatCaptured
I'm surprised they wouldn't support both and just give people the choice.

You have a choice...... to buy something else if you REALLY want your data collected. Porsche doesn't have to facilitate it if they choose not to.

A rational choice from a consumer standpoint is giving them the option of either. Then you can choose privacy if you want it, (and think it really exists).

Then implement that policy in the cars YOU manufacture. Don't lecture everyone else because they don't race to the lowest common denominator.
 
If your first concern is what kind of software platform overlays on the infotainment system and second priority is price, a Porsche is the incorrect vehicle for you.

correct. It would not be the right vehicle for me, not because of price, but because it doesn't offer both systems. If I were in the sports car market with the funds to buy these speed demons, I'd go for a different ride that would offer them, such as the newer Audi vehicles with Audi Connect (CP and AA compatible)
 
Dumb move by Google to make that information mandatory. I think personal privacy is going to continue to become a more important issue with customers and Google is not in a good position here. Last thing I want anyone knowing is my speed, breaking and driving habits. Too much like big brother if you ask me.
Tons of people volunteer this information to get discounted insurance rates. Progressive Insurance has the Snapshot tool that collects some of the same information Google wants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: commodorepet
You have a choice...... to buy something else if you REALLY want your data collected. Porsche doesn't have to facilitate it if they choose not to.



Then implement that policy in the cars YOU manufacture. Don't lecture everyone else because they don't race to the lowest common denominator.

It's just surprising when we see a lot of companies supporting both.
 
Tons of people volunteer this information to get discounted insurance rates. Progressive Insurance has the Snapshot tool that collects some of the same information Google wants.

I did the snapshot as well and I also do the same thing with ATT to get $40 off my internet bill.

edit: snapshot saved me 30% on my premium, so I now pay $302 every 6 months for full coverage and the highest limits.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang
This is an interesting point, especially since VW one of the first manufactures to integrate Android Auto into their 2016 vehicle lineup. You would think they would have taken this stand with all of the corporation's marques.

VW ousted their head honcho over the emissions cheating scandal and have appointed the head of Porsche as the new head of VW group, so maybe this will change, and ALL of the VW group will adopt Apple Play.
 
Does Porsche have sneaky emissions software like the rest of the vw group? Maybe that's why they don't like the data collection...
None of Porsche's sports cars come anywhere close to meeting EU emissions regulations for CO2. In fact, by volume, their average sports car sold exceeds CO2 limits by 100g/km or more. Porsche pays very heavy (a few thousand $USD PER CAR) fines in the EU for every car they sell.
 
Man I wish my car supported CarPlay. I have a fairly new car too. I wish I could update the software for it but I guess it hooks into steering wheel buttons and stuff? I have plenty of those though.
I have a 2002 Porsche 996 C4 cabriolet and installed a Pioneer SPH-DA120 receiver with CarPlay and love it.
Ironically, my 2015 Macan S doesn't have all those cool features
 
And today Facebook have fallen foul of data sharing laws.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34442618

Nope.

Actually, Facebook played by the rules made by the EU commission. The court just said that the rules were wrong.

But in fact that verdict might affect this case, too. If you consider that data personal data (it most likely is), then just by collecting thisit, Porsche would need to follow all kinds of regulations in Germany. Among these regulations is how the data is stored and protected. Today's ruling says that the US is no longer considered a "Safe Harbor" for personal data, i.e. data in the US isn't considered protected enough.

Giving Google that data directly might very well be illegal at the moment.
 
VW ousted their head honcho over the emissions cheating scandal and have appointed the head of Porsche as the new head of VW group, so maybe this will change, and ALL of the VW group will adopt Apple Play.

They already do. VW offers both (carplay and android auto) on the same unit.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.