Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This does solve one problem a lot of people have: using a case and your headphones won't fit in the 3.5mm jack.

i do think the lightning cable adapter should be L-shaped.
 
A dongle is a small piece of hardware that connects to another device to provide it with additional functionality.

In this instance you are not adding functionality but merely adapting the port. An adapter is the correct usage.

OP was wrong to complain about adapter, but you ruled out dongle, which I think is wrong also. The added functionality is you can plug a 3.5mm cable into your phone where before you couldn't. Dongle fits .. just as well as adapter.
 
Over an adapter?

run-on sentence incoming....
...over the lazy hardware designers and aggressive corporate cost-cutters that think one port is the way while passing the cost of apple authorized (which they get a financial piece of) adapters and chip enabled dongles to the consumer. We saw these shenanigans with the macbook and now the already minimal micro-computer we now call a phone. instead of giving the rest of the world and industries that use these products a good 3 years to adapt they force us to adapt with single port devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: milo
Aside from the wonky lightning end piece, looks plausible. I don't even care though. I can't wait for noise-cancelling headphones I can run off the lightning port instead of charging a battery pack every night.
 
I use one of these with my current headphones to amplify sound. Will suck to have use this along with a lightning dongle. I'll keep my 6S for one more year.

3584913_image_000.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Yes, but Apple is good at miniaturizing things. One piece, ultra tiny, ultra impressive at the unveiling. Anyone can do two pieces and a wire. Apple's power wall bricks have become so small compared to where they started off. I have faith Apple can do it in a single super miniature piece.
Actually... There's no reason why it should be two piece at all. The lightning part and the 3.5mm part can exist parralel to each other in one piece, i.e. wider not longer, therefore not needing to stick out further.
Nah, not if the two sections are parallel/next to each other.
Yes, but what if the two sections were parallel to each other, they wouldn't be longer than the current lightning part.
The problem is, the adapter cannot be less long than the jack port, so a 2 part solution allow you have a much shorter piece plugged into the phone, shorter than the jack itself.
 
what an idiotic idea Apple! Seriously, what the **** is happening to them? We all know jacks are still widely used and carrying a dongle adaptor or whatever is just ridiculous. I'm generally more happy with news but this one really is an unnecessary feat.
 
Looks bogus.

I would expect such an adapter to also have a female lightening port to allow simultaneous power to the phone.
 
So, no chance of having it plugged in to speakers on your desktop and keeping it charged up.

They'll probably also make a Lightning to 3.5 mm adapter - with charging integrated.
I use the Lightning to VGA adapter while charging.
Works perfectly.
 
I would expect such an adapter to also have a female lightening port to allow simultaneous power to the phone.

I expect that would be sold separately.
I actually don't know anyone who charges while using headphones.
Obviously some people do this, but possibly not as widespread as comments here would have one believe.
 
The problem is, the adapter cannot be less long than the jack port, so a 2 part solution allow you have a much shorter piece plugged into the phone, shorter than the jack itself.
The lightning part is only mildly shorter than the jack part and really wouldn't be an issue. I think it's entirely possible and safe for the device.
 
This is the real thing, unlike the obviously fake lightning EarPods that you somehow believed were genuine.
 
Actually you are adding functionality I believe...

There is no analog audio on the Lightning port if memory serves.

So you're not adapting anything, you're adding analog audio functionality over a 3.5mm jack to the iPhone.

So dongle is correct by your own definition and adapter is not.

Before long Apple will be pressed to break out income data from dongle sales at this rate! ;)
Only if the DAC is built into a dongle.

If however like many Android devices such as the LG V10 and HTC 10 they come with DAC hardware built in, or the Moto Z which is doing similar adapter to USB C with the DAC being in the phone, then the cable is merely an adapter.

I suspect for cost purposes the cable will be merely an adapter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: manu chao
One of the advantages mentioned of the lightning headphones was it could carry digital audio (not sure if that's the right term) and headphones could use custom DAC for better audio processing, the sound quality would be much better compared to that of 3.5mm jack.
With this adapter, wouldn't you lose that? More over you have extra adapter to carry with you. The only upside is you can use your old headphones and possibly slightly bigger battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
OP was wrong to complain about adapter, but you ruled out dongle, which I think is wrong also. The added functionality is you can plug a 3.5mm cable into your phone where before you couldn't. Dongle fits .. just as well as adapter.

That's not added functionality, that's conversion.
 
So when and if this happens, I'll no longer be able to charge my phone at my desk while also listening to a podcast with headphones? Or sometimes watch a video during a break, so a vertical stand that has an audio passthrough would not be a solution either.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.