Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Potential First Released Photo Taken by an iPhone 5

Ubuntu said:
This is a RUMOR of a photo being taken by an iPhone 5 which is an Apple product. It is definitely news for people who have interest in the iPhone 5 and its camera quality, so quit moaning already and just don't click the link if you don't like it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's called Macrumors not Macnews, silly.
 
caffeinejoe said:
Ken Rockwell is a bozo within the photography community. Google him and see.
Click to expand...

bozo or not, the statement was correct. increasing mp can have an adverse effect on picture quality. consequently, lower mp cameras can indeed produce superior pictures (e.g. as seen in the G10-G11 transition, even if this is not only due to mp's).
 
aeaglex07 said:
keep dreaming
Click to expand...

Seriously... how else will ATT compete with the pricing model? Look, i won't try to promote my site here, but read the most recent post I put up on my blog and tell me it doesn't make sense.

Just click on my name and it'll take you... but for real, ATT would lose WAY too much business if they don't compete. It's simple Supply and Demand really. They used to control the Demand because they had the only supply, so the price could be whatever they want...

Now that someone else is supplying the demand and a lower cost, the Equilibrium price has to be reduced... Just sayin
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8L1)

stadlin said:
cvaldes said:
Yes, it will have a 4.5" AMOLED screen, built-in Blu-ray player, 24 hours of battery life, eSATA connector, 4G LTE and WiMax and cost $99. Oh, and it will support Adobe Flash. ;)

It will be hand-delivered to you by a naked Megan Fox riding a pink unicorn who will take your pizza order and return thirty minutes later with the piping-hot pizza. Please, no tipping allowed.

:D
Click to expand...

Please do not feed the unicorn.
Click to expand...

Is Megan Fox qualified to ride a Unicorn? They can't be ridden unless the rider meets certain stringent 'purity' tests.
 
caru said:
grabbed just before it was made private


anyway, in my opinion doesn't matter which device took that pic, it's all part of "growing fever" strategy. i think none will be fired :p


[url=http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6859/schermata20110907a18342.png]Image[/URL]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Click to expand...

Expect a contact from some lawyers... you aren't a news site, and the photo is subject to copyright.

----------
divinox said:
bozo or not, the statement was correct. increasing mp can have an adverse effect on picture quality. consequently, lower mp cameras can indeed produce superior pictures (e.g. as seen in the G10-G11 transition, even if this is not only due to mp's).
Click to expand...

Ken is a blowhard...
 
StyxMaker said:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8L1)



Is Megan Fox qualified to ride a Unicorn? They can't be ridden unless the rider meets certain stringent 'purity' tests.
Click to expand...

Mine better be delivered by a sweaty, musky, naked Ryan Gosling. Preferably on a motorcycle. ;)
 
PBF said:
I demand that MacRumors take down the post immediately as it's my photo stolen from my Flickr photo stream. It was shot by me with my old Canon point-and-shoot from 2006. :mad:
Click to expand...

Did anyone else see this post??
 
Adding glass to make lens faster.

cvaldes said:
Also, adding a supplemental lens would not result in a faster f-stop than the built-in lens. You can't go from f/2.8 to f/2.4 by adding another layer of glass. The only way to do this is an entirely new lens unit.
Click to expand...

I think you can actually, with a focal-lenth reducer. Pretty common on telescopes used for astro-photography (gives a wider filed of view and reduced imaging times); not sure why nobody makes them for 35mm cameras.

Steve
 
I can get down with everything on that plate except for the avocado roll.

I mean , Really, what a stupid choice for a roll.
At least get a California roll or something.

"Oh my god, I've been craving Avo and Rice all day"

I just don't get it. Its almost the same price ac the California ..
 
SvenSvenson said:
I think you can actually, with a focal-lenth reducer. Pretty common on telescopes used for astro-photography (gives a wider filed of view and reduced imaging times); not sure why nobody makes them for 35mm cameras.

Steve
Click to expand...
Yeah, but if I understand correctly, those focal length reducers and extension tubes aren't valid for a device (like a smartphone) whose lens elements aren't detachable. In any case, such a modification still wouldn't update the EXIF data.
 
Using a proprietary algorithm I have extracted an image of the iPhone 5 from the reflection off the plate.

It looks great!
 
And another thing

jays_sushi_wide_low_res-160x160.jpg


This photo was taken with a 23 MegaPixel Camera

But you just can't tell from this shot because I cropped the photo and scaled it down.

You're just going to have to take my word for it. ;)


What a Load Of Crap
 
Mr. Gates said:
And another thing

Image

This photo was taken with a 23 MegaPixel Camera

But you just can't tell from this shot because I cropped the photo and scaled it down.

You're just going to have to take my word for it. ;)


What a Load Of Crap
Click to expand...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original image dimensions were present in the EXIF data...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back