Errr embedded is what I'm talking about. Motorola has already implemented memory interfaces on some of theire ebedded chips. A fast G4 with an on board memory controller couold be very attactive to there embedded cusotesr and Apple alike.
To be honest I don't think the spun off division has a chance in hell of staying in the embedded market it is in now without system CPU's. MUch of the embedded space that the G4 goes into will benefit form better performance. The market is there.
Besides do you really think that Apple wants to put all its eggs in one basket? I suspect that Apple willl continue to use Motorola hardware for as long as itis practical. Obviously that won't be to long if Motorola can't continue to improve its product line.
Dave
To be honest I don't think the spun off division has a chance in hell of staying in the embedded market it is in now without system CPU's. MUch of the embedded space that the G4 goes into will benefit form better performance. The market is there.
Besides do you really think that Apple wants to put all its eggs in one basket? I suspect that Apple willl continue to use Motorola hardware for as long as itis practical. Obviously that won't be to long if Motorola can't continue to improve its product line.
Dave
oingoboingo said:I doubt Motorola would really be interested in investing any significant R&D resource into a desktop processor line which is really only used by one customer...and that customer has staked the performance future of their company on moving away from your chip designs!
As many people have pointed out in the past, once the CPU division of Motorola is spun-out, they probably want to concentrate on designing and building new embedded PowerPC designs, rather than sinking a lot of money into upgrading desktop/notebook CPUs destinated for a business relationship which is ultimately a dead-end.