numediaman said:
Yes, I was wrong. There will not be updates today.
It's a shame -- as an Apple user since '82-83, I have never seen the product line in such bad shape. Yes, I'm excited by the G5s -- in theory. But what does it tell you about a company that announces the G5 at WWDC in 2003, but can't deliver until September -- then can't do updates until the following summer?
You do realize that Apple told all of us when the G5 was announced that it would NOT immediately ship. The 1.8 and 1.6 GHz DID in fact ship within their announced timeframe (barely), the dual G5 was delayed a bit longer.
I think Apple's product line is stronger than I've ever seen it. They have a still-very-bitching desktop machine (we've got a dual 2GHz and it rocks very very hard), the iMac is still unique if ageing and overdue for a rev, the powerbook line is very nice.. NO ONE else has a 17" laptop that is even close to the Powerbook (Acer's weighs 15.8 lbs and has a battery life UP TO 45 minutes depending on use!)
Not to mention that they own the portable music player market.. which is generating plenty of interest in the Apple, and even the Mac.
As for no updates till Summer.. It isn't summer yet, is it? There may not be updates till summer, but we don't know that yet. Apple doesn't make every component in the Macintosh.. they don't fab the processors, the controllers, the video chipsets. It's very possible that Apple decided to move the next G5 tower to include cutting edge tech (just like they did when the introduced the G5). If they decided to opt for PCI-Express video, they couldn't possibly ship an update yet because neither ATI nor Nvidia has released their PCI-Express chips yet.
Personally, I'd have liked to see an interm update back in January... but I don't know what forces were in play. Did IBM have faster 970s available? Apparently they didn't have the 970fx available in quantity.. it sure took a long time for the xServe to ship (and now only in single CPU configs). It's entirely possible that IBM is holding Apple back.
🙁 I, like many others, are very frustrated by Apple being so closed mouthed about when the next machines might be coming out. It doesn't make sense. Certainly we are not going to buy the older product because we are tired of waiting, but all this frustration does make me have second thoughts about whether I should be looking at Apple anymore. I want to be able to depend on fresh product, not just for this release, but down the road as the years go bye. It shouldn't be a game. And the H*ll with the IPods. 😡 😡 😡
Well, have you tried to consider Apple's position? Apple is a computer manufacturer that builds it's products when the components are available. Intel and AMD may have plenty of roadmaps out.. but where are Dell and Gateway's roadmaps? Aside from a pre-announced paper launch, do you ever see a roadmap from a PC company on when their faster CPUs will be released? I sure haven't.. because they'd have to base it off of someone elses roadmaps.. an estimate based off an estimate.
OK, let's look at this yet another way... Apple is a computer manufacturer with a limited market share. They also run a simplified product line, only three speed grades in the Pro line when ever possible (Apple got MAJORLY stung in the past by having too many product lines, something that Amelio and Jobs cleaned up). Dell can sell machines ranging from 2GHz to 3.2GHz.. if the bottom line speed grade falls off, they simply take a tiny hit, discount it, and move on. Apple, otoh, a) doesn't have a large grade of CPUs available... they haven't been offered G5s in speed grades from 1.6GHz to 2.8GHz at the same time.. and b) hey also can't justify keeping stock that is so varied with such a small installed base. This causes a problem though.. Because they haven't received regular updates in processor speed grades or regular updates in supported architectures (G4s still don't support DDR FSBs), Apple hasn't been able to provide regular if minor bumps to the product line.. as a result they are in a cycle of waiting, .. a long time.. till the next big bump (even if big is 66 or 100MHz). Mac users are trained as a result.. to wait for the next big bump. Evertime a rumor comes out, no one geeky enough to read rumors sites buys any macs.
As a result, Apple can't offer a roadmap because it would significantly affect their sales in a given quarter.
Now, if Apple had received regular updates to their components over the past few years.. if we had G4s with DDR buses running at 2+ GHz and 2.6GHz 970s that were provided at regular intervals.. Mac users would be more like PC users.. We'd expect that the current Mac tower would always have an update around the corner so you might as well buy it when you wanted/needed it. Right now, it's like.. 'oh, the next bump is gonna be big because we only get 1 or 2 a year.. so why should I buy if they haven't updated in 6 months? It's got to be soon, so I'll just wait..'
One more thing to consider.. Apple spends a hell of a lot more R&D and time designing a mac. They don't simply copy some reference design and whip out another ATX gray box. A transition between models is a major effort on Apple's part. The move to something like PCI-Express wouldn't be a big effort on their part.
I agree that I don't like the way Apple rolls out machines, but there are viable explanations as to why the act the way they do. I'd love to see Apple move to a more open, heck more Dell model.. where they had a tower, and you picked the CPU speed from a range of available options.. This would make the machines much more flexible.. it would allow Apple to make revs quicker (and prevent people from playing the waiting game). When a new model comes out, just move the old model to a secondary standing till it cleared out.. and god forbid you discount the depreciated inventory and sell more quantity of machines to drive up your market share a bit.
jmho..
ffakr