Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Keep in mind that Apple after signing an agreement with Qualcomm has now decided they dont like the arrangement and dont want to pay the agreed price. it has also been allgeded that Apple tranferred Qualcomm’s intellectual property to compeditor Intel to assist them in developing a competing product so Apple would have an alternative supplier. It is futher alleged that it is odd that compeditor Samsung now challenges Qualcomm’s market position since Apple may have been restricted from doing so by their previous Qualcomm agreement. This is also the same Apple that aggressively pursues independent repair shops for alleged intellectual property violations.

Someone that fully understands the licensing.
Apple unilaterally decided the fees are too high.
Mind you, Samsung, OnePlus, etc. pay the same fees.

Apple claims infringement of generic patents all the time. (I think patents that don't specify how you will do a certain thing are ideas and not technology, but don't get me started).

So this is Qualcomm, going after Apple the same way Apple goes after other folks.
If Apple would just live up to it's contractual agreements this wouldn't have gone this far.
 
Ok ready?

1) The arrest and warrant are based on (what the fake news calls) Bank fraud saying one bank is owned by another, truth of the matter is the CFO (daughter of company founder) has been known to help violate sanctions that were placed on Iran. (the US government sees this as someone who has secrets about Iran) Also, this will help destroy any chances between USA and China trade agreements.

2) The USA didn't really "ban" any Huawei products, they placed an embargo on Huawei until the spy thing has been fixed, but with trust issues, they want to (or already did) remove Huawei Cell towers.

3) Yes, American companies don't supply parts for Huawei.

Thank you.
Remember, just because apple doesn't lose certain court cases doesn't mean they are right, it just means they have deeper pockets.

I know that pain! Not MVA related.

As do most motor vehicle accident (MVA) victims.
[doublepost=1544474320][/doublepost]
How do you import something into the country it's manufactured in? That's a head scratcher…

Most "manufacturing" countries have Industrial Zones, a tax-exempt "development" zone, that produce products exclusively for "export". Apple's (and most any manufacturer/assembler) products are "Made in China" in these zones. India has them from at least the 70's. They are not technically part of the host country.

Everything made in these zones are not for domestic consumption - immediately "exported" to consumers elsewhere. If they are routed to the host nation, they are "imports"!
[doublepost=1544474615][/doublepost]
Some parts are made in the US and have to be imported there.

They are "imported" to the "foreign" zones - technically, they did not enter those countries. After the full or partial product is assembled, they have to be "exported" to qualify for the zero tax status. When "Apple" moves them into "China" to sell them to the consumer - tariff time.
 
For those asking about exporting: While I don't completely understand it, China has economic zones for manufacturing that don't have the same laws as the rest of the country which allows companies to export much more inexpensively and get around a lot of laws they would otherwise have to follow. It's sort of like a country within a country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grayskies
For those asking about exporting: While I don't completely understand it, China has economic zones for manufacturing that don't have the same laws as the rest of the country which allows companies to export much more inexpensively and get around a lot of laws they would otherwise have to follow. It's sort of like a country within a country.

"Duty-free Export Manufacturing Zones" and similar phrasing are used. Yes, an economic country within the main country.
 
he first Qualcomm patent reportedly enables users to "adjust and reformat the size and appearance of photos," while the second is said to relate to "managing applications using a touch screen when viewing and navigating apps."

That's patent trolling. No way they invented that, lots of prior art, and they never did anything to make it a reality.

Is it realistic for Apple to manufacture and assemble iPhones in America?

Problem number 1 is materials and supply chain is mostly in China.

Problem number 2 is takes a long time to train new workforce in America.

A solution is to manufacture more in Vietnam and India which would also help grow user numbers in these regions. Foxconn is opening in Vietnam.
 
Last edited:
You're asking the wrong question. Can Apple manufacture anything?. Every thing they produce is made by other companies components.

What’s your point? That’s the case for most electronics. Does any company manufacture the whole widget without using anyone else’s components?
 
I asked about this in the political segment of the forum - what is the deal with the arrest warrant and the arrest?



Did the USA really ban any Huawei products that the consumer uses directly or just the infrastructure elements?

Are American (USA) companies banned from supplying Huawei parts like the ZTE deal?
yes, huawei consumer phones are banned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPandian1
China finally bit the hands that feed it. After Apple spent the last 3 years with "Pro China" statements in their keynotes and interviews, not to mention supply that country with hundreds of jobs, they finally got what they deserved.

As an long time Apple fan, it's good to see John Scully, I meant Tim Cook, feel the wrath of the consumer market. This would make for a good revival story if Scott Forrester or Phil Schiller bring the old Apple back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macbookhair
Without getting too political, the west have stolen HUGE amounts from countries such as China over the years. I think their list is far longer than anything China could conjure up.
The war on those weapons of mass destruction that couldn't be found went through the highest embodiment of 'kangaroo court' in any land I'd say.
Help me understand your thinking, the US has stolen what exactly from China?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Qualcomm?

Do they make consumer electronics devices? They are a component manufacturer, like many others. But you can’t compare them to Apple. You need to compare Apple to someone like Dell or Samsung. Even Samsung sources components from other manufacturers despite producing a lot of components themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Do they make consumer electronics devices? They are a component manufacturer, like many others. But you can’t compare them to Apple. You need to compare Apple to someone like Dell or Samsung. Even Samsung sources components from other manufacturers despite producing a lot of components themselves.
Look this is a friendly conversation; technically you're right; but Samsung makes screen, flash storage, RAM, LG makes screens etc ; what does Apple make?
 
Last edited:
Look this is a friendly conversation; technically you're right; but Samsung makes screen, flash storage, RAM, LG makes screens etc, LG makes screens etc; what does Apple make?

Not much. But what does that matter? What point are you making? Plenty of companies don’t manufacturer what they design. Others manufacture lots of products and design nothing. And a lot of companies land somewhere in between. So, again, what’s your point?

It’s also worth noting that Apple designs a lot of components even if they don’t build them. So it’s quite unfair to say that Apple just makes their products from everyone else’s components. They’re not just picking standard components off the shelf. Someone had to design those components.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Money.

But seriously, Apple designs some of the best silicone right now, and relies on contract manufacturing.

Many companies don’t own their manufacturing, and not just in the tech industry. I serious doubt Breville owns the factory that made my blender. I guess I don’t understand why manufacturing something versus contracting someone to manufacture matters. The essential component in the process is the CREATIVE component. Without that, there’s nothing to manufacture.
 
I wish Apple would hurry up and make their own networking chips. They've been doing pretty darn well with the A-series chips for years. Intel is clearly not the alternative.
 
But, this does not mean they will never go somewhere else, if China gets too expensive (it will happen) they will move somewhere else, maybe by then Indonesia for instance has the workforce and skills, although I doubt it. (Been living there)
It really doesn't matter. China isn't stupid and have not been standing still. They've diversified globally, so that plant in the Philippines, Vietnam, or Indonesia will probably be owned by a Chinese company.
 
BTW folks, Qualcomm is a US company. It's Qualcomm that brought the case against Apple. If there's any displeasure, go and blame Qualcomm. As for the IP cases through the courts, it's always a mess, starting with the US courts...
 
If it’s a fight you want, Qualcomm, it’s a fight you will get.

According to Apple, iOS 12 invalidates their patents anyways, so I don’t expect this to have any impact on Apple.

The way Qualcomm ran to make a big spectacle out of this is also very telling. They clearly have an incentive to make it seem like they are better positioned to go up against Apple in courts around the world.
 
That is so funny!

So they design that crap in Cupertino with H1B's.
Build it in China.
Ship it (using lots of carbon emissions) around the world

BUT, they can't sell it in China where they build it!

If someone told me that back in the 1970's I'd say they were bonkers. But it's reality today!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.