Someone needs to convince me that’s not terrible for a battery long term.
see my comment above.... it will be done using new batteries..."In addition to offering much faster charging, Quick Charge 5 is up to 70 percent more efficient and up to 10 degrees Celsius cooler compared to Quick Charge 4 and 4+. Qualcomm says there are 12 separate voltage, current, and temperature protections included."
I'm pretty suspicious of Qualcomm's claims. Almost never is faster charging cooler. Not unless the chips are GaN based and they are talking about the charging equipment being lower temp - I find it very hard to believe the battery can charge a lot faster and be considerably cooler, that's not how the physics works - I have an MSc in this sort of stuff.
If it does what they claim, it absolutely is innovation.That’s your definition of innovation?
I know a thing or two about lithium ion battery chargers having designed chips for that application. This is undoubtedly going to sacrifice battery lifetime in a significant way, so use this charging technology very sparingly! Take what you'll pay for such a charger and the few times you'd actually want to use it, and then think of it in terms of the price you'll be paying per device charge (and that's not even factoring in how much closer you'll be to paying for a replacement battery when that time comes). This argument holds for any fast charging lithium ion technology.
Yeah. I don’t believe that.
It literally says in the article it’s reducing the temperature by 10° C compared to other technologies.
I miss the days when Apple led the market with innovation.
Forgive me for not buying the marketing for Quick Charge 5.0.
Bye-bye battery longevity. I am sure Qualcomm is trading battery longevity for significantly quicker charging. I don't think that if you consistently use this quick charge (like every day for 2 years) that it will have the same battery life as an iPhone that uses Apple's Quick Charge adapter or even a third party quick charger that charges at 7W max.That’s going to be one hot phone!
If Apple announced this, people would be praising and drooling.I think it's hypocritically hysterical that there's loads of mockery citing exploding android phones that skip right past this part of the article.
Also skipping that this standard has already existed and is not responsible for exploding phones...
And if we *really* want to poke fun: keep in mind that it was apple recently who "tried" to develop this little known thing called AirPower, repeatedly failed, and then scrapped it after it already went public that it was an upcoming product.
Meanwhile, Apple was the company that for many, many years kept delivering 5w power chargers, only *very recently* started including stronger chargers in the higher tier models, only to be rumored to be axing that entirely.
Despite this, one can go on Amazon and purchase mutli-port PD chargers with USB-C and USB-A ports for charging multiple devices quickly, and inexpensively, while being well built. The new one is they're all developing reliable 100W PD chargers that are significantly cheaper than Apple's bricks.
tl;dr y'all are laughing in the wrong direction.
Bye-bye battery longevity.
Comment referred to OP where it’s claimed “waiting to see innovation from Apple”(sic) where innovation seems to be a personal moving definition.If it does what they claim, it absolutely is innovation.
It literally says in the article it’s reducing the temperature by 10° C compared to other technologies.
I’m glad Apple is using industry standard USB-C + PD, not proprietary Qualcomm crap.