Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My biggest worry with the new Air is the screen, yes Apple “updated” it and amped the brightness but I hope the black levels don’t suffer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: souko
I think the new MBA-M2 looks awesome!

While I really like the MagSafe charging, the only question I have is why would Apple go back to the MagSafe, when the EU wants everything USB-C in near future.

Okay, when can we order? :)
 
Nah you got me. Every bottom of the range Mac laptop comes with a free camera :lol:

Have you ever been to a photography forum? How’s the outrage levels for the cheapest apple laptops not having Sd cards? Haha.

Basically you want an SD. Even here very few care.

Go check the MacBook Air forums if you really think the majority of MBA users a- ask about cameras and b- request SD cards.
It’s a non-issue. You can get a portable dongle that outperforms the SD card reader in the Mac. It’s not a dealbreaker. It’s something that easily slips into the bag. Does every top of the line Mac come with a free camera? I don’t even get that statement. The bottom of the barrel M1 can tear through photography workloads. You act like the low end model is useless or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
I think I’ll keep my 16” M1 Pro. Briefly and emotionally considered replacing it with the new M2 MBA, but the lack of multiple external support and likely resolution limitations are sadly deal breakers.
 
No, Apple aren't beating Intel in % increase per year after the initial huge leap to Apple Silicon - but the bigger problem with Intel would be that they'd have started the hype for the next generation of chips while Apple were still waiting for the right TDP/GPU combo from the last generation to ship.
They're absolutely beating Intel in historical year-over-year performance improvements, though. I mentioned this in another thread, but in the 7 years between my Late 2013 iMac (i7-4771) and the fastest Intel iMac ever produced (Mid 2020 w/ i7-10700K), single-core performance per Geekbench 5 only increased 37% (913 for my i7-4771, 1250 for the i7-10700K), which averages out to ~5.3% year-over-year improvements. Apple just managed an 18% increase in single-core in 20 months (10.8% year-over-year), without increasing the TDP or having a node shrink.

Unless the assumption is that Intel is going to continue to make Alder Lake-level generational improvements every year now after almost a decade of lacklustre gains and struggles with node shrinks, I'd say Apple is doing pretty well on its current trajectory.
 
I shouldn't have to come up with some Rube Goldberg contraption just to get a good camera.
This is a "personal desires vs laws of physics" situation. Do you want a thin and light laptop? If so, the built-in webcam is going to need to be very thin to fit within the width of the screen, making it hard to put in a large sensor and good optics (hence why iPads and iPhones can fit better front-facing webcams than MacBooks). Apple's new iPhone-as-webcam feature is a great workaround, letting you easily use the much larger sensor and much better optics of a full-size camera lens that's far too large and thick to ever fit in a ultraportable's display.

That said, as the owner of a 14" MBP with presumably the same new webcam as the M2 MBA, the webcam is pretty good as long as I'm not in low light (that's when the weird DSP kicks in). I have an LED lamp at my desk I turn on for meetings and the picture and colour are nice and clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
Well, I did use a friend's 14" and while I did see the difference. I can live without the nonPro motion.
I have the 16” M1 Pro and can definitely live without Pro Motion. I would gladly swap my machine with a 15 inch M2 MBA so long as it can support multiple external monitors.
 
Well, I did use a friend's 14" and while I did see the difference. I can live without the nonPro motion.
I am sure everyone can that doesn't have it lol

I think the difference on the 14" MacBook is you are using a track pad to do everything, pro motion isn't as noticeable for me with my 13 max, just going between it and my iMac.

The screen on the 14" makes my 24" iMac seem average. The air 2 will be no better. Coming from a M1 12.9 the 14" was the right decision for me, screen and pro motion alone.
It's over twice as fast to as my 8/512 24" iMac.
 
Last edited:
I am sure everyone can that doesn't have it lol

I think the difference on the 14" MacBook is you are using a track pad to do everything, pro motion isn't as noticeable for me with my 13 max, just going between it and my iMac.

The screen on the 14" makes my 24" iMac seem average. The air 2 will be no better. Coming from a M1 12.9 the 14" was the right decision for me, screen and pro motion alone.
It's over twice as fast to as my 8/512 24" iMac.
To each their own. I knew full well about the 14" and still bought the 13".
 
I'm actually excited about it. I've always loved the airs even though I'm in the use case of the pro, but this air really has me tempted. I wanted something smaller/lighter than my 16 inch MBP for travel and while traveling I'd primarily only be using Xcode.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neo_cs193p
I think I've decided to get a MacBook Air M2 bumped to 16GB in midnight.

My current non-work Mac is a MacBook Pro (Retina 13", Late 2013) also with 16GB. Funny to think nearly 10 years ago and the RAM is the broadly the same (albeit it faster).

I know this is going to be a substantial improvement from my current Mac, but I'm slightly concerned about the thermal performance and throttling, and the lack of higher display refresh rate, compared to my iPhone which I'm glued to most days.

I use my Mac casually, with some Xcode and web dev thrown in. I'm hoping I'll manage without the sustained performance on offer with active cooling and a fan!

I think I'd rather have an Air with new design language, than the new 13" MacBook Pro which effectively has the same design as my 2013 model, or the 14"+ which are pretty chunky and expensive.

Disappointed they aren't slightly cheaper, and will be massively disappointed if the wait is months for a custom configuration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phillytim
Have you also taken into account the new shape of the Air? Thermal capacities are unknown at this time.
I have faith it will be fine. The mechancial CAD program I use is cloud based. It uses the CPU on Amazon servers that host it. The ram and GPU resources are local. I have a mid spec Ultra with 64GB ram, and two lowest spec M1's with 8GB ram. They all run the CAD about the same, except until the system RAM runs out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StoneJack
I have faith it will be fine. The mechancial CAD program I use is cloud based. It uses the CPU on Amazon servers that host it. The ram and GPU resources are local. I have a mid spec Ultra with 64GB ram, and two lowest spec M1's with 8GB ram. They all run the CAD about the same, except until the system RAM runs out.
If the CAD program is cloud based, you can find a mitigation of the load.
 
What’s my reaction? It’s insanely great new product. The price is a little steep but that does not change the fact the new MBA is an amazing computer. AFAIC the 1 external monitor does not concern me. It’s light, powerful and portable. And beautiful - love the colours!
I would not describe it as "insanely great". You may even think it is great, but not in an insanely way. It is pretty much a redesign, with nothing too exciting about it. And a higher price tag. Nothing insane about it.
 
I'm actually excited about it. I've always loved the airs even though I'm in the use case of the pro, but this air really has me tempted. I wanted something smaller/lighter than my 16 inch MBP for travel and while traveling I'd primarily only be using Xcode.
I expect clean compiles and simulator cold start to be noticeably slower than the M1 Pro/Max just like M1 is, but other than that it should be great. Which spec are you getting?
 
It increases, but not proportionally.

A 14.2" screen is 9% larger than a 13.6" one, yet the 14.2" Pro is 30% heavier and 67% more expensive.

The 16.2" screen is 42% larger than the 13.6" one, but the 16.2" Pro is 74% heavier and twice the price.

No proportion here. If the proportions were to be kept, a 14.2" Air would be 2.9 lbs and would cost $1300, and a 16.2" Air would be 3.8 lbs and would cost $1700.

the base M2 Air only has 8gb RAM so if you upgrade to 16gb the cost difference with M1 14 is narrowed a lot
 
I expect clean compiles and simulator cold start to be noticeably slower than the M1 Pro/Max just like M1 is, but other than that it should be great. Which spec are you getting?

If I bite I'll probably get the M2, 24 gigs ram (for $200 more I'd rather have too much than not enough), and a 1TB drive. It clocks in at $2099 and for something that should be fine for me for the next 4 years I'm good with that.
 
Does Apple really provide slower SSD's in its MacBook Air computers than what it puts in the 14/16 Pro models?

If so, why would Apple charge the same amount of money for upgrading storage capacity whether it be Air or Pro?
Also going from 16GB RAM to 24GB RAM on MBA costs same as going from 16GB RAM to 32GB on MBP. Makes no sense.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.