It’s a non-issue. You can get a portable dongle that outperforms the SD card reader in the Mac. It’s not a dealbreaker. It’s something that easily slips into the bag. Does every top of the line Mac come with a free camera? I don’t even get that statement. The bottom of the barrel M1 can tear through photography workloads. You act like the low end model is useless or something.Nah you got me. Every bottom of the range Mac laptop comes with a free camera :lol:
Have you ever been to a photography forum? How’s the outrage levels for the cheapest apple laptops not having Sd cards? Haha.
Basically you want an SD. Even here very few care.
Go check the MacBook Air forums if you really think the majority of MBA users a- ask about cameras and b- request SD cards.
they can't suffer more than what they already do lol,blak levels on mba m1 are the worst i've ever seen in my lifeMy biggest worry with the new Air is the screen, yes Apple “updated” it and amped the brightness but I hope the black levels don’t suffer.
yes ,more than twice as slow in factDoes Apple really provide slower SSD's in its MacBook Air computers than what it puts in the 14/16 Pro models?
If so, why would Apple charge the same amount of money for upgrading storage capacity whether it be Air or Pro?
They're absolutely beating Intel in historical year-over-year performance improvements, though. I mentioned this in another thread, but in the 7 years between my Late 2013 iMac (i7-4771) and the fastest Intel iMac ever produced (Mid 2020 w/ i7-10700K), single-core performance per Geekbench 5 only increased 37% (913 for my i7-4771, 1250 for the i7-10700K), which averages out to ~5.3% year-over-year improvements. Apple just managed an 18% increase in single-core in 20 months (10.8% year-over-year), without increasing the TDP or having a node shrink.No, Apple aren't beating Intel in % increase per year after the initial huge leap to Apple Silicon - but the bigger problem with Intel would be that they'd have started the hype for the next generation of chips while Apple were still waiting for the right TDP/GPU combo from the last generation to ship.
This is a "personal desires vs laws of physics" situation. Do you want a thin and light laptop? If so, the built-in webcam is going to need to be very thin to fit within the width of the screen, making it hard to put in a large sensor and good optics (hence why iPads and iPhones can fit better front-facing webcams than MacBooks). Apple's new iPhone-as-webcam feature is a great workaround, letting you easily use the much larger sensor and much better optics of a full-size camera lens that's far too large and thick to ever fit in a ultraportable's display.I shouldn't have to come up with some Rube Goldberg contraption just to get a good camera.
Well, I did use a friend's 14" and while I did see the difference. I can live without the nonPro motion.go back and forward between a iMac 24" and 14" MacBook for a day and get back to me lol
I have the 16” M1 Pro and can definitely live without Pro Motion. I would gladly swap my machine with a 15 inch M2 MBA so long as it can support multiple external monitors.Well, I did use a friend's 14" and while I did see the difference. I can live without the nonPro motion.
That makes me sad ... and mad!yes ,more than twice as slow in fact
can't argue with that
You'll be stuck with an M1 Pro then, cause I highly doubt Apple will allow more than one external for M3. M4? Perhaps.I have the 16” M1 Pro and can definitely live without Pro Motion. I would gladly swap my machine with a 15 inch M2 MBA so long as it can support multiple external monitors.
I am sure everyone can that doesn't have it lolWell, I did use a friend's 14" and while I did see the difference. I can live without the nonPro motion.
To each their own. I knew full well about the 14" and still bought the 13".I am sure everyone can that doesn't have it lol
I think the difference on the 14" MacBook is you are using a track pad to do everything, pro motion isn't as noticeable for me with my 13 max, just going between it and my iMac.
The screen on the 14" makes my 24" iMac seem average. The air 2 will be no better. Coming from a M1 12.9 the 14" was the right decision for me, screen and pro motion alone.
It's over twice as fast to as my 8/512 24" iMac.
I have faith it will be fine. The mechancial CAD program I use is cloud based. It uses the CPU on Amazon servers that host it. The ram and GPU resources are local. I have a mid spec Ultra with 64GB ram, and two lowest spec M1's with 8GB ram. They all run the CAD about the same, except until the system RAM runs out.Have you also taken into account the new shape of the Air? Thermal capacities are unknown at this time.
If the CAD program is cloud based, you can find a mitigation of the load.I have faith it will be fine. The mechancial CAD program I use is cloud based. It uses the CPU on Amazon servers that host it. The ram and GPU resources are local. I have a mid spec Ultra with 64GB ram, and two lowest spec M1's with 8GB ram. They all run the CAD about the same, except until the system RAM runs out.
I would not describe it as "insanely great". You may even think it is great, but not in an insanely way. It is pretty much a redesign, with nothing too exciting about it. And a higher price tag. Nothing insane about it.What’s my reaction? It’s insanely great new product. The price is a little steep but that does not change the fact the new MBA is an amazing computer. AFAIC the 1 external monitor does not concern me. It’s light, powerful and portable. And beautiful - love the colours!
I expect clean compiles and simulator cold start to be noticeably slower than the M1 Pro/Max just like M1 is, but other than that it should be great. Which spec are you getting?I'm actually excited about it. I've always loved the airs even though I'm in the use case of the pro, but this air really has me tempted. I wanted something smaller/lighter than my 16 inch MBP for travel and while traveling I'd primarily only be using Xcode.
It increases, but not proportionally.
A 14.2" screen is 9% larger than a 13.6" one, yet the 14.2" Pro is 30% heavier and 67% more expensive.
The 16.2" screen is 42% larger than the 13.6" one, but the 16.2" Pro is 74% heavier and twice the price.
No proportion here. If the proportions were to be kept, a 14.2" Air would be 2.9 lbs and would cost $1300, and a 16.2" Air would be 3.8 lbs and would cost $1700.
I expect clean compiles and simulator cold start to be noticeably slower than the M1 Pro/Max just like M1 is, but other than that it should be great. Which spec are you getting?
Also going from 16GB RAM to 24GB RAM on MBA costs same as going from 16GB RAM to 32GB on MBP. Makes no sense.Does Apple really provide slower SSD's in its MacBook Air computers than what it puts in the 14/16 Pro models?
If so, why would Apple charge the same amount of money for upgrading storage capacity whether it be Air or Pro?