Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OMG no! They can't even get Siri to work reliably with the HomePods. I have over 8 of them and they get confused constantly. LOL
Which is why they are doing a top to bottom replacement. Current Siri is a poor indicator of where they are going with this.
 
If it works, it'll be nice - I still remember how good their on-device voice recognition was before Siri.

I'm highly skeptical about improving Siri though - it's based on ancient tech. ML/AI has had many major revolutions in tech and architecture since it was built, and trying to add new features to it, is like running Windows 3.1 on top of DOS.
This is not “improving” Siri. This sounds more like a tear down.
 
A big I told you so from February 2023:




The dismissive responses in this thread are wild. 🤣

It's incredible how Steve Jobs acquired Siri in 2011 and Tim Cook had no idea what he meant by it until 2023. Apple is large enough that it can recover from this and catch up but they desperately need another visionary CEO.
Tim Cook is Apple's version of Steve Ballmer
 
Who is then? Or are you just venting without an opinion on who is the right person?
Are you trying to imply that there is no right person to replace Tim Cook? Because if you are, then Apple truly is doomed if Tim Cook is the best they can do post-Steve Jobs.

Apple needs a visionary product CEO. My first choice would be Tony Fadell.
 
Apple’s market cap is actually about 600 million bucks more than nVidea. Not saying your point is wrong, just incorrect on that one point.
Yeah, for some reason Apple's stock app gave me the quote in CAD instead of USD and I did not notice that.😊

Nevertheless, Apple beware. There is a significant potentially existential competitor at your doorstep. You gotta think nVIDIA are planning to push hard and that push could come in the form of a handheld device.
 
If nVidia made a phone, it would run android.
So… not a threat.
You’re really not understanding this, are you? Nvidia (or anybody really) could release something AI-based that topples smartphones wholesale as the piece of tech people interact with most frequently. Instead of people centering their tech lives around their smartphone, they could center it around whatever this revolutionary AI-device is.
 
Tim Cook is a genius. When he took the reins from Jobs, Apple's market cap was $800 billion. Today, it's just south of $3 TRILLION. Tim is also now a billionaire, and heads one of the largest companies in the world. Is he a perfect CEO? No, of course not. But you can't name any CEO or human being who is. I'd bet you can't even come up with someone who would demonstrably do a better job of running a Fortune 5 company, either.

So now, what are your qualifications to judge his intelligence? What are your criteria? Do you believe you're smarter than him? No, you realize he's smarter than you are, because you're not a dumb "brick," right?
This is embarrassing
 
It's incredible how Steve Jobs acquired Siri in 2011 and Tim Cook had no idea what he meant by it until 2023. Apple is large enough that it can recover from this and catch up but they desperately need another visionary CEO.
There’s never gonna be another visionary CEO. Steve Jobs didn’t come from the tech industry because it barely existed until he helped create it along with many other people who would never be given decision-making power in today’s tech industry

The tech industry has been taken over by frat boys, grifters, con artists, narcissists, sociopaths, nepo babies, silver spoon Harvard grads, and MRAs.

People like Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Bankman-Fried and Sam Altman are the only people who will have power in the tech industry going forward

It’s over.
 
I imagine you would have achieved an AI that could pass the Turing Test in a week or two, in your spare time?
Well I did not say I could manage Siri development. Did spend few decades managing a very complex, highly-technical, very capital intensive product line. My point WRT to John G. is that he was hired in 2018 to improve Siri. His background was perfect. Yet since his hire nothing has improved. Gotten worse in many opinions. If he had performed like that with our group, he would likely be out the door not managing Apple's new AI effort. Maybe he is great, and was hand-cuffed re: Siri. Maybe he and some other top-level Apple execs have lost focus on delivering high-quality, inspiring software solutions. I am fearful it is the latter. I hope not, but peformance history is a good predictor of performance future. Many folks give great meetings, and under-perform. It may be that Apple, since Jobs left, has focused on the former and John G. benefited from it.
 
Who would you choose to be his successor after you fire him? Oh, I forgot to ask, you ARE on Apple's board of directors, right? If not, better to keep your counsel before revealing a lack of understanding of what is required to lead a $3 trillion company and simultaneously please all shareholders, customers AND a board of directors.
🤣 Quite the leap there where I'm just pointing out how Apple fell behind on AI to you thinking I want to fire Tim Cook.

Sorry if I hurt your feelings. Please don't send these people after me

why.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
They could have improved Siri's AI long ago but left it dumb as a post until now. They're just jumping on the AI bandwagon because everyone else is. That's not exactly "leading" the charge in the technology field.
And is a direct result of Cook's lack of understanding the technology field.

Siri will never improve until Cook is gone. The improvement will end up just like the car, never completed.
 
Steve Jobs famously said, "We're not going to be first to this party, but we're going to be the best." I don't agree with everything apple chooses to do these days, but I do think that they still strive to be the best at what they do choose to do.
That was Jobs' company. Cook is we will strive to extract the most money from our customers as possible and hope they don't wake up anytime soon to our poor performing software and keep buying our hardware.
 
I wish Apple had the conviction to say "I think AI in its current form is a bunch of overhyped BS and we are not going to jump onto this bandwagon" and stick to their guns. And then years later when "AI" goes the way of Adobe Flash, we can look back and realise that Apple was right all along. Rather than pepper their ads with "AI" just to pacify shareholders. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
Apples Ai will only be as good as its ability to write Mac specific code without botching it up like all the other AI models do. If Apple isnt going to nail that on day one it doesnt deserve to brag about AI or whatever marketing name it will call it. Because you know they are not about to be lumped in with every other AI in every other device.
 
I’m thinking the holding pattern and even issues the last couple of years have been to launch something much much bigger, and I would wager that next releases at WWDC are it. Apple servers, chips doing things on device, and OS/software, this is what they’ve been aiming for
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.