Which is why they are doing a top to bottom replacement. Current Siri is a poor indicator of where they are going with this.OMG no! They can't even get Siri to work reliably with the HomePods. I have over 8 of them and they get confused constantly. LOL
This is not “improving” Siri. This sounds more like a tear down.If it works, it'll be nice - I still remember how good their on-device voice recognition was before Siri.
I'm highly skeptical about improving Siri though - it's based on ancient tech. ML/AI has had many major revolutions in tech and architecture since it was built, and trying to add new features to it, is like running Windows 3.1 on top of DOS.
If nVidia made a phone, it would run android.Maybe you should talk to Nokia and RIM about how Apple didn’t use to make phones…
Journalist at its best 😂It took them several weeks to see what was wrong with Siri and made it antiquated?
Tim Cook is Apple's version of Steve BallmerA big I told you so from February 2023:
![]()
Apple and AI / LLMs [MERGED]
As much as people hate on it, Siri is critical to Apple’s future. It’s frustrating that so little is said about Siri from senior executives at Apple. Artificial Intelligence is hard but a company of Apple’s resources should be pouring not just millions but billions into developing Siri. Like...forums.macrumors.com
The dismissive responses in this thread are wild. 🤣
It's incredible how Steve Jobs acquired Siri in 2011 and Tim Cook had no idea what he meant by it until 2023. Apple is large enough that it can recover from this and catch up but they desperately need another visionary CEO.
Are you trying to imply that there is no right person to replace Tim Cook? Because if you are, then Apple truly is doomed if Tim Cook is the best they can do post-Steve Jobs.Who is then? Or are you just venting without an opinion on who is the right person?
Yeah, for some reason Apple's stock app gave me the quote in CAD instead of USD and I did not notice that.😊Apple’s market cap is actually about 600 million bucks more than nVidea. Not saying your point is wrong, just incorrect on that one point.
You’re really not understanding this, are you? Nvidia (or anybody really) could release something AI-based that topples smartphones wholesale as the piece of tech people interact with most frequently. Instead of people centering their tech lives around their smartphone, they could center it around whatever this revolutionary AI-device is.If nVidia made a phone, it would run android.
So… not a threat.
This is embarrassingTim Cook is a genius. When he took the reins from Jobs, Apple's market cap was $800 billion. Today, it's just south of $3 TRILLION. Tim is also now a billionaire, and heads one of the largest companies in the world. Is he a perfect CEO? No, of course not. But you can't name any CEO or human being who is. I'd bet you can't even come up with someone who would demonstrably do a better job of running a Fortune 5 company, either.
So now, what are your qualifications to judge his intelligence? What are your criteria? Do you believe you're smarter than him? No, you realize he's smarter than you are, because you're not a dumb "brick," right?
And they have done almost nothing with it. The API's are immature. The potential is certainly there but Apple has been waiting around for someone else to do the work for them.Apple has been including neural processing units in their SOC’s since 2017.
Every single Apple Silicon Mac has a neural processing unit.
Siri can’t even understand English. I took almost a year for Siri to understand “Hey Siri, play the song ‘CUFF IT’ by Beyoncé” 😂Let them remember about Polish, I don't know if it's real that Siri finally may do understands something in my language![]()
There’s never gonna be another visionary CEO. Steve Jobs didn’t come from the tech industry because it barely existed until he helped create it along with many other people who would never be given decision-making power in today’s tech industryIt's incredible how Steve Jobs acquired Siri in 2011 and Tim Cook had no idea what he meant by it until 2023. Apple is large enough that it can recover from this and catch up but they desperately need another visionary CEO.
This! 1000%I'm on my hands and knees praying that Siri can finally be better than Alexa so I can throw out my Echo Dot. If Siri is actually useable for once, I can finally feel comfortable building out my Apple Home with HomeKit-enabled accessories instead of Alexa enabled
Well I did not say I could manage Siri development. Did spend few decades managing a very complex, highly-technical, very capital intensive product line. My point WRT to John G. is that he was hired in 2018 to improve Siri. His background was perfect. Yet since his hire nothing has improved. Gotten worse in many opinions. If he had performed like that with our group, he would likely be out the door not managing Apple's new AI effort. Maybe he is great, and was hand-cuffed re: Siri. Maybe he and some other top-level Apple execs have lost focus on delivering high-quality, inspiring software solutions. I am fearful it is the latter. I hope not, but peformance history is a good predictor of performance future. Many folks give great meetings, and under-perform. It may be that Apple, since Jobs left, has focused on the former and John G. benefited from it.I imagine you would have achieved an AI that could pass the Turing Test in a week or two, in your spare time?
🤣 Quite the leap there where I'm just pointing out how Apple fell behind on AI to you thinking I want to fire Tim Cook.Who would you choose to be his successor after you fire him? Oh, I forgot to ask, you ARE on Apple's board of directors, right? If not, better to keep your counsel before revealing a lack of understanding of what is required to lead a $3 trillion company and simultaneously please all shareholders, customers AND a board of directors.
And is a direct result of Cook's lack of understanding the technology field.They could have improved Siri's AI long ago but left it dumb as a post until now. They're just jumping on the AI bandwagon because everyone else is. That's not exactly "leading" the charge in the technology field.
I'm on my third iPhone and have had Siri disabled since day one, 6+ years ago. Am I missing anything??
That was Jobs' company. Cook is we will strive to extract the most money from our customers as possible and hope they don't wake up anytime soon to our poor performing software and keep buying our hardware.Steve Jobs famously said, "We're not going to be first to this party, but we're going to be the best." I don't agree with everything apple chooses to do these days, but I do think that they still strive to be the best at what they do choose to do.