Post-calibration results - rMBP vs. cMBP
As promised earlier, here are the post-calibration uniformity results of my rMBP and my early-2011 cMBP (with hi-res anti-glare display). I calibrated both displays to 6500°K and 100 cd/m2.
First up, here are the rMBP's results:
Second, here are the cMBP's results:
Notice the maximum luminance delta of 9 cd/m2 for the rMBP and 18 cd/m2 for the cMBP. The maximum white point delta for the rMBP is 153K and for the cMBP it's 187K.
So, what this means is that my "shoddy" LG rMBP display has better brightness and color temperature uniformity than my older MacBook Pro's 15" anti-glare display. I think maybe I thought the cMBP's uniformity was subjectively better because its color uniformity is symmetric; in other words it's warmer in both lower corners of the display whereas the rMBP is cooler in one corner and dead-nuts on in the other corner (the corner, incidentally, that I thought was the most yellow).
Of course, the calibration tool can't take measurements in the extreme corners of the display so the delta values could be worse (or better) there. Still, this is pretty solid objective evidence that, in least in my case, despite what my eyes tell me, the uniformity of my rMBP's display is pretty significantly superior to my cMBP's display.
Interesting note -- I guarantee that most people would consider the post calibration results on all of my monitors (iMac included) to be "yellow". What's also interesting is that the post-calibration color temperature of my rMBP didn't change much from the default display profile. In other words, based on anecdotal evidence, the LG displays aren't too yellow; the Samsung displays are too blue.
Of course, all of this matters not a whit if you have a display with a color gradient. Calibration won't help you at all.
As promised earlier, here are the post-calibration uniformity results of my rMBP and my early-2011 cMBP (with hi-res anti-glare display). I calibrated both displays to 6500°K and 100 cd/m2.
First up, here are the rMBP's results:
Second, here are the cMBP's results:


Notice the maximum luminance delta of 9 cd/m2 for the rMBP and 18 cd/m2 for the cMBP. The maximum white point delta for the rMBP is 153K and for the cMBP it's 187K.
So, what this means is that my "shoddy" LG rMBP display has better brightness and color temperature uniformity than my older MacBook Pro's 15" anti-glare display. I think maybe I thought the cMBP's uniformity was subjectively better because its color uniformity is symmetric; in other words it's warmer in both lower corners of the display whereas the rMBP is cooler in one corner and dead-nuts on in the other corner (the corner, incidentally, that I thought was the most yellow).
Of course, the calibration tool can't take measurements in the extreme corners of the display so the delta values could be worse (or better) there. Still, this is pretty solid objective evidence that, in least in my case, despite what my eyes tell me, the uniformity of my rMBP's display is pretty significantly superior to my cMBP's display.
Interesting note -- I guarantee that most people would consider the post calibration results on all of my monitors (iMac included) to be "yellow". What's also interesting is that the post-calibration color temperature of my rMBP didn't change much from the default display profile. In other words, based on anecdotal evidence, the LG displays aren't too yellow; the Samsung displays are too blue.
Of course, all of this matters not a whit if you have a display with a color gradient. Calibration won't help you at all.
Last edited: