$999.00 monitor stand
2 years ago (after years of Apple neglecting the expandable Mac market) I bought a machine with similar specs to this new base model 2019 Mac Pro.
8 core processor? Check -- AMD Ryzen 1700x with 8 cores/16 threads
32 GB of DDR4-2666? Check
1 TB of SSD storage (actually more than this Mac Pro starts with). Check
nVidia GTX-1060 graphics with 6 GB VRAM. Check
High quality tower case with easy motherboard access and room for expansion? Check
Runs virtually silent even with 3 fans inside the case (one of them being mounted onto the CPU to keep it cool without a 9" tall 15" long heatsink? Check
And for this bucket of magnificence I paid around $1,300. Granted I needed to snap the pieces together myself, but that's really not so difficult and didn't take more than two hours of my time. Is two hours of my time worth an extra $3,700? Nope. I'm all good, thanks.
Too bad I needed to give us MacOS to do this. I really love MacOS. I really wish Apple gave a damn about users who want an expandable headless Mac who cannot justify a 2nd mortgage on their home just for the entry model.
If you told me a Bugatti cost $2 million I wouldn't be surprised.Pffftt pocket change for some people I know who will recoup that cost with one job. This is for professionals who do high end work.
Yes. Yes I did.Did you gear the crowd at wwdc gasp at that price?
And when adjusting for inflation, it's half the price of a Mac II (another pro workstation, back in 1987, that finally gave people slots etc. instead of all-in-one systems).
Did you gear the crowd at wwdc gasp at that price?
I don't know enough about that industry, but I'm just guessing that might change after this. This computer is in it for the long haul.
I love it. Apple has covered all possible Pro needs (Mac mini, iMac, MacBook Pro, iMac Pro, Mac Pro), depending on workflow, and budget, this is what we all wanted and asked for. They have probably put more effort and R&D into Pro market then ever before.
I am curious why the base model Mac Pro is $1,000 more than the base model iMac Pro which has also has an 8-core Xeon and 32GB of RAM but the base model iMac Pro has 4x as much SSD space, a much more powerful GPU, and a 5k display to boot. I get that you are paying for expandibility but the initial price seems high or else the iMac Pro now looks like a screaming good deal.
At WWDC today, Apple unveiled its much-anticipated Mac Pro redesign, and following its keynote the company offered journalists some brief time with the machine - although admittedly nobody was allowed to use or even touch it.
![]()
With that in mind, we've highlighted some of the more interesting quotes from those who were lucky enough to get up close with Apple's most powerful Mac to date.
Unsurprisingly given the "hands-off" nature of the preview, TechRadar opined on the aesthetics of the redesigned Mac Pro:
![]()
Image credit: TechRadar
TechCrunch was less impressed with the look of the new Mac Pro, and questioned the "cheese grater" industrial design choice.
Gripping the handle on top of the Mac Pro and lifting the lid exposes the internal components, and Engadget noted how this makes the internals "relatively accessible" compared to the previous design.
![]()
Image credit: Engadget
As for the display, Engadget said:
The Verge chose to focus on the sheer power of the new Mac Pro, which is heavily geared towards video, music, and photo editing.
![]()
Image credit: The Verge
The new Mac Pro starts at $5,999 with an eight-core Intel Xeon processor, 32GB of ECC RAM, AMD WX 7100 graphics, and 256GB of SSD storage, and will be available to order in the fall. Apple's new 32-inch 6K display named the Pro Display XDR will also be available in the fall starting at $4,999.
Article Link: Roundup: First-Look Impressions of the New Mac Pro
What's the IP rating for dust on this computer and monitor?
I love the fact Apple made this Mac Pro. I just wish they had a cheaper entry level option at $3/4K price with 1TB/64GB RAM.
The prices are just too insane high.
The display is incredible, but $7k with stand and nano tech is ridiculous. They could have an option @ 5K display at $2500 with stand/nano.
Around $13k to get a MP/Display combo is not a feasible option for most Pro's.
To quote their own ad: Tens of ... dozens...Its gorgeous but I wonder how many of these they will actually sell? So many power users gave on Apple a while ago. Not sure if they will ever return.
"This is totally gonna make up for that lost iPhone revenue."
I love it. Apple has covered all possible Pro needs (Mac mini, iMac, MacBook Pro, iMac Pro, Mac Pro), depending on workflow, and budget, this is what we all wanted and asked for. They have probably put more effort and R&D into Pro market then ever before.
I'm not that concerned about the cost of the stand; I just find it odd they charge for a stand in the first place.
Sorry if I hit a sensitive core here; I been working with computers since I was 15, I from the generation that actually spend time in the real world, when I’m done working I go off the grid…computer gaming never appeal to me…I been bias I know.