Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wow, this degree of sheer SKU bloat with barely different parts-bin iterations is reaching 2005 Nokia levels.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: nvmls
It is at expense of potential battery life. If they didn't make it 10% thinner (which who really cares at a phone that size), that's 10% more battery they could have squeezed in there...

Can't wait for the 6.7"!

I don't think so, the phone will be taller and wider, this would offset the thinnest design.
 
I am asking for better battery life - NOT a thinner phone with a thinner battery.
As it is, when on a long bike ride, I've got to have a battery extender --iphone battery case or separate battery pack-- to keep the phone alive while it is running a bicycle travel tracking app.
Please Apple, provide longer battery life.

Got it. We should all have to deal with a thicker and heavier phone all the time as to not inconvenience you having to use a battery case when you use your bicycle tracking app during a long bicycle trip. ;)
 
It's so easy, I have to spend so much time researching which iPhone is best for my friends and family since, as I already mentioned, they ask me every year which phone to get.

Economies of scale play a huge role in the cost of the device, not just features. Not to mention, less of the standard dark color/storage configuration I want gets made in favor of providing a variety colors/storage so the one I want is sold out. Okay fine, I'll just pay more for the maximum 512GB version on top of the already inflated price due to lower economies of scale, right? Or maybe I just wait a month. Or maybe I'll just choose the awful gold color no one wants. Or maybe I'll get the big phone I'm probably going to regret. Or maybe the budget phone that I *might* hate. So many options. Easy.
You do have to take a moment out of your day to appreciate the great effort by Tim and his team to make your buying decision just a little more complicated than it should be. Especially if you want a phone that easily fits in your pocket, has all of the latest tech, has just the right amount of storage, not too little, not overkill and doesn’t destroy your wallet.
 
hope larger rear sensor wouldn't mind "larger physical size of the circumference " manufacturers are making cameras larger to look better, when the truth is the real window for the sensor is quite small, you can put tape over the glass around the small "eye" and you would see has no effect on light or quality. except for the wide angle, but even here the glass is far to large Vs the real opening the sensor needs
 
I’m going to take everything with a grain of salt until March/April rolls around. However, I still would like the larger phones to be reduced in weight, more so than anything.
 
Ugh, I don't want thinner, I want smaller! Make one I can use comfortably in one hand! Also, I don't need a fancy camera, I'd love to get rid of the camera bump.
 
WTH is asking for thinner phone? It's already awkward to hold without a case. Make it more durable, not thinner.

Actually, make it thicker so that
  1. You get rid of that ugly camera lump that's sticking out
  2. It's easier to pick up
  3. It can have a bigger battery
 
Economies of scale play a huge role in the cost of the device, not just features.

That may be true, but without a cost breakdown provided by Apple, we have no way of telling. And more units is not always better, there is such a thing as diseconomies of scale. Apple is now selling around 200 million iPhones annually, 80 million more than 2012, the last year of one iPhone type only. It might actually be harder/more expensive/downright impossible to source for example 200 million screens of exactly the same type, compared to the current situation of, say, 50 million of this type, 50 million of that and so on.
 
I’m so excited to hear the news that the 5.4” iPhone height will be between that of the iPhone SE and iPhone 8. This confirms that the 5.4” model is Apple’s return to a one-handed use device. Praise all that’s holy.
Correction: This extends one-handed use to a larger portion of the population. There are plenty of people for whom the 5.8” iPhones are perfectly useable with one hand. And there will be plenty of people for whom the 5.4” iPhone won’t be useable with one hand. One-handed use is a spectrum, not a binary thing (seen from the phone’s perspective).
[automerge]1579603192[/automerge]
WTH is asking for thinner phone? It's already awkward to hold without a case. Make it more durable, not thinner.
Which iPhone except for the iPhone 6 was suffering from durability issues due to it’s thinness?
 
Last edited:
So if you want a smaller phone next year you’re basically left with a downgrade compared to the regular iPhone 11 Pro camera-wise: two sensors instead of three? I’m really annoyed they’re pulling this stunt again instead of offering the same camera technology on both sizes. If these rumors are true that is.
 
The 5.4“ is looking more and more like a winner for me.
I'm just hoping they don't do the classic thing and sell the smaller device as a low-end device. I'll still buy it, but I'd feel much better if they gave it the love a high-end device deserves. Just because it's small doesn't mean it has to be made for a lower price!
 
The 6.7" Max Pro should have 4 camera lenses. A new lens to make crisp pictures up to 10X. 4 lenses would likely also sell much better in China.
Do any of those 10x phone cameras actually produce crisp pictures?

Make speakerphone sound quality much better.

Boost phone call earphone loudness higher for noisy environments. Match loudness better to very noisy environments.
Having compared my iPhone 6 with my X and my 11 Pro, the sound quality and volume made a significant step forward each time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: profets
It depends if it has trade offs compared to the 6.7” model

It won’t have pro features but it also won’t have a pro price. Which means the masses will love it and sell in droves like the XR and 11.
 
Thinner? Guess Johnny Ive’s influence is not completely gone yet..
Some might still reminisce about the glory days that brought us the 12” PowerBook, not the ultra thin laptops of today. Point being, laptops aren’t 30 mm thick anymore not because of Ive, but because 99% of people prefer thinner and lighter than that over a 2-day battery life.
 
Some might still reminisce about the glory days that brought us the 12” PowerBook, not the ultra thin laptops of today. Point being, laptops aren’t 30 mm thick anymore not because of Ive, but because 99% of people prefer thinner and lighter than that over a 2-day battery life.

I have to wonder why these people follow Apple in the first place? If you’re that kind of person that wants thicker and heavier Apple is clearly not the company to follow. They’ve always been about making things as thin and light as possible, removing ports etc. Yet people still act outraged when they do the same thing they’ve been doing for 20 years.

Disclaimer yes I’m aware their phones have been getting thicker and heavier but I mean in general.
 
Correction: This extends one-handed use to a larger portion of the population. There are plenty of people for whom the 5.8” iPhones are perfectly useable with one hand. And there will be plenty of people for whom the 5.4” iPhone won’t be useable with one hand. One-handed use is a spectrum, not a binary thing (seen from the phone’s perspective).

Well, actually...🤓
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.