Not to mention support and upgrades. IPhone 6s is over 4 years old but is getting the latest iOS update, next week. Not a year or two later, but next week. The iPhone 5s is over 5 years old to date and still received access to the current 12.4.1. We can also just walk into a local apple store and receive full support.
For any android over a year old, it can take over a year after release of a new OS to receive the latest android. After 2 years, the software releases are next to non-existent for most devices.
Its been over a decade and Android manufacturers and weirdo fanboys just don't seem to get this simple concept.
Sell sizzle, not steak. Marketing 101.
Since I'm a firm subscriber to idea of Caveat Emptor, I find it ridiculous to base buying a phone for its camera performance. If it performs well as a phone and, since it's a smart phone, an internet connected device. If I want to take videos with great bokeh, I'll use my Canon and an L-lense.
Oh yeah. MacRumors knows how to troll their audience.Seems to happen every single time MacRumors posts an article like this. Hate to say it, but they are part of the problem.
This just shows how little Samsung knows about iPhone-users in generel... what a completely stupid "feature." LTT tested it and it looks sooooo horrible. I think this ad will net exactly zero switchers.
Oh lawd, it's the L Mount Alliance!Sell sizzle, not steak. Marketing 101.
Since I'm a firm subscriber to idea of Caveat Emptor, I find it ridiculous to base buying a phone for its camera performance. If it performs well as a phone and, since it's a smart phone, an internet connected device. If I want to take videos with great bokeh, I'll use my Canon and an L-lense.
I mean, in 12 months, Apple sold 215M phones at an average of $760/each. So for Apple, their average phone is $760...those are real numbers. Samsung refuses to break them out, but I can tell you from Samsung's overall earnings that they don't do close to $166B in phone revenue in 12 months, like Apple did. You certainly agree Samsung's ASP isn't $760, right? It's mathematically impossible based on Samsung's earnings.Which iPhone? Lumping them all together? Got numbers for iPhone Pro Max vs Note 10+ ?
[doublepost=1568401482][/doublepost]Apple's bokeh is so broken it can't even get enough working images to fill a website advert and puts up this garbage:
![]()
https://www.apple.com/iphone-11/
Which iPhone? Lumping them all together? Got numbers for iPhone Pro Max vs Note 10+ ?
[doublepost=1568401482][/doublepost]Apple's bokeh is so broken it can't even get enough working images to fill a website advert and puts up this garbage:
![]()
https://www.apple.com/iphone-11/
Right and the original post questioned who is copying who with the bokeh, as many here like to discuss that sort of thing. Apple has dynamic hdr in video and Samsung has bokeh. Apple has had both in photographs.And? The result is that Samsung phone has boken in video and iPhones don't. Is that a bad result for Samsung? One may question the quality of the bokeh but the same is true for still pictures and Apple made countless adds about their bokeh/shallow DOF (portrait mode).
Garbage? What’s wrong with that image? Looks amazing. Are you talking about those blurry hair edges? If you are, it’s not fault that’s exactly how they wanted it to be. They want you to look the face of woman smiling and it should make you feel happy. It’s basic marketing. That’s why they blurred the hair to make it more soft and not distracting and point your eyes to right place.
Well will find some imperfection in Samsung’s photo and then call those photos garbage also. Easy-peasy to sling the mud. Guessing it’s garbage because Samsung’s is worse.Which iPhone? Lumping them all together? Got numbers for iPhone Pro Max vs Note 10+ ?
[doublepost=1568401482][/doublepost]Apple's bokeh is so broken it can't even get enough working images to fill a website advert and puts up this garbage:
![]()
https://www.apple.com/iphone-11/
Any data on actual phones? Breakdowns on that share? Otherwise it’s a talking point
It's portrait mode bokeh photo applied to video. People who like portrait mode but don't like this yet because Apple wasn't first.
Apple will do it second, but have a better implementation.It's portrait mode bokeh photo applied to video. People who like portrait mode but don't like this yet because Apple wasn't first.
I really wonder why Apple didn't add Apple Pencil support... doesn't hurt nobody not using it, and could have made a couple of hundred millions $ from selling pencils. Now ProCreate Pocket customers need to resort to Wacom and Adonit![]()
Brokah , you made me spit up my coffeeI had the Note 10 for a week - it was a very slick device. Didn't use the S-PEN at all... the Bokeh (Live Focus) Video... was Brokah. It was horrible - interesting idea, but total gimmick.
Rumor is iPhone 11 Pro has the hardware for pencil support AND bilateral wireless charging but is software disabled. Reasons is iOS13 wasn't ready for Apple Pencil on the phone and may come later this year. The bilateral wireless charging they are waiting for the new Airpods to be released for Xmas and the charging will be a selling point. Also, they want Apple Tile to be ready and add UWB to the Airpods too, so if you lose them, you can find them.
Well will find some imperfection in Samsung’s photo and then call those photos garbage also. Easy-peasy to sling the mud. Guessing it’s garbage because Samsung’s is worse.![]()
It's a quick knock on the difference between a Galaxy and a competitor's phone. It's not about the feature itself, but the difference in features. It's supposed to send the message "Samsung is better". But it fails.
Samsung basically copied Huawei. The P30 and P30 Pro already did this before the Note 10. And they’re less expensive as well.So did Samsung take the iphone portrait feature and extend it to video? Did they copy a feature, innovate a feature or improve a feature?
It's a fundamental effect in photography and videography. So far Apple managed to implement the same effect only for still photos (portrait mode). They are rumored to add ToF sensor to iPhones next year, so you'll probably get this cheesy effect next year.I'm not switching for some cheezy video effect. GTFO, Sammy.
Yeahhh. The iPhone notch is just... bad. Once I saw it, I said that I've never buy a phone with a notch until this trend is over. Since Apple is perfectly content with selling the same phone for the third year in a row (again), I'm thankful that least other manufacturers have moved on so that we all have some options sans notch.I was worried about that too at first, but turns out to be fine and minimally distracting; and, IMHO, much better than the huge gash that is theiPhone notch.