Apple is not interested in supporting a dying technology.
lol... they still use a cable to charge there phone. and it takes more than twice as long to do it
Apple is not interested in supporting a dying technology.
After looking at the Galaxy S6, I had to say to myself, "Where I have I seen this before?"
(Holds up my iPhone 6) Ah, that's where I seen it before.
Mind you, I do like the new camera and wireless charging, though Apple's excellent Lightning connector and pretty fast charging times even from half-discharged doesn't make me pine for wireless charging, though.
Yea because people are just hovering around stores with magnetic field interceptors waiting for that soccer mom to buy milk.....
The tech used is fromt a company called Loop Pay, which was created before Apple Pay was announced. Makes more sense to call it Samsung Pay and not Samsung Loop or Samsung Pay Loop
Hmm...Didn't Apple buy out the technology for Apple Pay?
And since when did they have a trademark on the name "Pay"?
Yeah, its similar, but Samsung is allowed to compete-and if there is no trademark, why not? Unless you think App Store is defensible...
lol... they still use a cable to charge there phone. and it takes more than twice as long to do it![]()
BTW, if the original card has a chip in it, you can't use it in a swipe terminal if it also accepts chip/pin (there would be no point to the added security otherwise) and I doubt that will change.
Apple copied the Samsung active s.it was out well before the iPhone 6.
LoopPay is making deals with banks like Chase to allow them to modify the card's service code, to appear like a magswipe only account.
This will allow LoopPay / Samsung Pay to avoid the chip insertion request.
--
Btw, has everyone here been reading the news about gangs using Apple Pay to make millions of dollars of fraudulent purchases?
As much as 6% of the amount of Apple Pay purchases are being done by criminals pretending to be someone else. They enter stolen credit card info into iPhones, get "verified", and then use Apple Pay on the phones to buy high dollar items.... ironically, often at Apple Stores... that are then resold.
The criminals even call the banks to let them know that they'll "be on vacation out of town", so that fraud alerts won't kick in. Social engineering at its best.
A banking industry consultant lays the blame on both Apple and the banks, for not setting up better verification ahead of time. He also mentions that Apple has been of little help tracking down fraudulent registrations, due to makeshift reporting methods.
.
LoopPay is making deals with banks like Chase to allow them to modify the card's service code, to appear like a magswipe only account.
This will allow LoopPay / Samsung Pay to avoid the chip insertion request.
--
Btw, has everyone here been reading the news about gangs using Apple Pay to make millions of dollars of fraudulent purchases?
As much as 6% of the amount of Apple Pay purchases are being done by criminals pretending to be someone else. They enter stolen credit card info into iPhones, get "verified", and then use Apple Pay on the phones to buy high dollar items.... ironically, often at Apple Stores... that are then resold.
The criminals even call the banks to let them know that they'll "be on vacation out of town", so that fraud alerts won't kick in. Social engineering at its best.
A banking industry consultant lays the blame on both Apple and the banks, for not setting up better verification ahead of time. He also mentions that Apple has been of little help tracking down fraudulent registrations, due to makeshift reporting methods.
.
Yeah that is great that some consultant is laying blame on apple but the fact is that the only reason fraud is popping up related to apple pay is banks not doing a good enough job of verifying cards that are added to devices.
Look on the bright side people, at least it'll hopefully encourage to Apple to drop the ridiculous 16gb of base flash memory on their flagship... let alone finally going above 1gb of ram too.
Precisely. But I would not worry as much this time. Apple is now much more that a Device Maker. Samsung Mobile is nothing but a Device Maker. Apple has made a VERY successful transition to a Platform Manufacturer.
Samsung is completely dependent Google. The Android versions on their devices are fragmented as all hell.
Does anyone really thing Samsung Pay will be as secure as Apple Pay? If you do, I suggest you inform yourself ASAP on App Fragmentation.
Let Samsung copy. Tim won't go "Thermonuclear." Apple no longer competes with Samsung Mobile. Let samsung sell millions of S6's. Big deal. Android is the largest Mobil OS from being on $19 Pay Phones from Dollar Tree.
Not competing with Apple.![]()
That's exactly what I thought when I saw the iPad mini and the iPad Air first and then the iPhone 6 - the reference to them is pretty obvious, especially as they are completely flat. I agree, the Antenna breaks are a feature that the HTC had as well, but other than that there are no similarities at all in the phones (although it's obvious why those who see them want to see them, considering their background).
All in all everyone hates everyone, all of the sudden people flip flop like stupid over "no SD slot, no removable battery, glass back" and there's only one word for "pay", but also the apple people here are kind of entertaining too. Neither Apple nor Samsung will stop making phones from one day to another. The whole "we hate each other" thingy that you can read here and on a lot of Android boards right now is irrelevant.
Other phones had styluses way before the Note. Just because Samsung's implementation was better due to available technology at the time doesn't mean they invented styluses on a phone.
You can look up tablets pre-Samsung that used Wacom yourself. Google is free for everyone to use. Here, I'll give a little hint: ASUS.
Your 'other firsts' are hilariously irrelevant in this discussion. Samsung of the late 20th century are not Samsung of today. They used to be a truly imaginative and innovative company and they lost all that when they broke out the photocopiers.
After looking at the Galaxy S6, I had to say to myself, "Where I have I seen this before?"
(Holds up my iPhone 6) Ah, that's where I seen it before.![]()
I laugh at some of the comments in this thread. Why do you care who copied who? I could give a rats ass if Samsung copied apple or vice versa. That's not my fight. I don't own either apple or Samsung to care. I own a few hundred apple stocks but I'm not going to cry foul because a Samsung phone looks like my iPhone. Let cook do it. Lol.
Thats fair.It would be a lie if I said I favor Samsung as most of my current devices are Apple and only my TV is a Samsung which I got for free. Unlike many of the trolls here, I do not bash Apple, I do enjoy my Apple products more than I ever enjoyed my previous Samsung products. I could name a list of my bad experiences with Samsung here.
I am not sure if the its fair to compare USB to Lightning, USB is a widely available standard while Lightning is an Apple standard. Manufacturing a cable to generic standard would seem easier than an Apple specific standard. IMHO - Early aftermarket Lightning cables were really bad and just within the past 6mo - 1 year have the aftermarket Lightning connector cables become reliable.And my comment was not meant to defend Samsung. Many people in general are reluctant to changes and most people pay the marked-up price for a cable at Best Buy even if they can get one for much lower everywhere else. Just in this forum alone, there was countless angry people when Apple changed to Lightning, I was personaly very happy when they even if I already owned 10 30-pin cables.
If I wanted to say iPhone 6 was was not the first rounded side phone then I would have included not just Samsung but other rounded phones including the original iPhone. Not including anything else but Samsung Ativ S smells fishy.I never meant to say that the iPhone 6 was inpired by the Ativ S in no way. They do not look alike at all. I only posted the picture to point out that this is not Samsung's first rounded sides.
The irony of this statement on this forum....Other phones had styluses way before the Note. Just because Samsung's implementation was better due to available technology at the time doesn't mean they invented styluses on a phone.
Antenna breaks are not a design feature but a functional necessity for antennas. iPhone4 had it and so does the HTC One, I don't understand how can one translate that to copying HTC.I agree, the Antenna breaks are a feature that the HTC had as well, but other than that there are no similarities at all in the phones (although it's obvious why those who see them want to see them, considering their background).
What's missed here is that Samsung made fun of iPhones in their ads for having a headphone jack on the bottom.The headphone jack is on the bottom of my Samsung galaxy nexus. Came out in 2011
Are we suggesting that because Samsung annouced Ativ S couple of months before the iPod touch release, Apple had the time to copy Samsung? What is the point of the statement?[/COLOR]Which was announced after the Ativ S. Please do your research------
Are we suggesting that because Samsung annouced Ativ S couple of months before the iPod touch release, Apple had the time to copy Samsung? What is the point of the statement?
The irony of this statement on this forum....
Im really disapointed. Only thing that samsung proved with this phone is that they can do a thing without apple. This is iphone on android and is not going to help them to sell more. Pathetic
Are we suggesting that because Samsung annouced Ativ S couple of months before the iPod touch release, Apple had the time to copy Samsung? What is the point of the statement?