Here, for your reading and viewing pleasure:
Galaxy S5 vs. the cheap Moto E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P9vDAY0U0A#t=325
So you can flash your Samsung. You can also flush it down the toilet, since it's waterproof.
Really, all devices can be modified, jail broken, etc. So what is your point?
But my personal all time favorite: it took *minutes* for the Gallery App to open on the Note 3. While at the same the benchmarks were tempered. That shows, where the priorities of Samsung were/are. Priceless.
Note 3 review - Ars Technica
I'm sorry, i know I am opinionated. After a total of 3 Galaxy devices in our household me and my wife came to the conclusion that there are better Android Choices out there. Not that overhyped, over marketed Samsung crap.
I see no major lag in that video. Like I said, .1 millisecond lag compared to stock Android. Who cares? Buy a GPE S5 or flash CM if you want stock on a Sammy. It's not difficult. Even if you can't get GPE in your country (as I can't in mine) the CM Installer will automate installing CM on your phone for you, you literally just need to download the app, plug it in, then wait.
That review comes across as ridiculous biased. Sounds like it was written by someone who was out to hate the Note 3 from the start. The initial bugs in the software that caused things like the gallery issue were fixed within a week or two of release. If you use that as a point against the Note 3 then can I use old, already patched iOS bugs as points against the iPhone?
I also don't see how Samsung is cheating benchmarks. In normal use of the phone, if you even just scroll through menus, the CPU clock will jump up to the top speed while it does that anyway. Using that top speed for benchmarks is not dishonest. Far too big of a deal was made out of that.