If getting a “performance management” software upgrade counts as on OS upgrade I would be pleased not to get them...sneaky fixes are not upgrades!
Neither is expecting your aging equipment to run flawlessly.
If getting a “performance management” software upgrade counts as on OS upgrade I would be pleased not to get them...sneaky fixes are not upgrades!
The fact that my iPhone 5 that I use for plane traveling is not lagging at all with the wallet app. Or showing white screen when loading movies app.
Is the iPhone 6 that much worse?
You mean like the GS9 looks like the GS8 which looked like the GS7? And the GS6, 5 & 4 which all were very similar.If Apple hadn't reused a nearly identical design for four years this ad wouldn't be possible, but the iPhone 8 is nearly indistinguishable from an iPhone 6 from the front. Granted, performance is Apple's main advantage over Android as its Chipsets are at least a year ahead of the competition. I guess Samsung is using the strategy of attacking their competitors strengths instead of highlighting their weaknesses.
Additional performance power management features were first introduced in iOS 10.3, not iOS 11. They also only apply to iPhone 6 and later devices. But let's not actually allow facts to get in the way.Depends on what iOS version is forced onto the iPhone 6. Being that you have the iPhone 5 there's no update beyond 10.3.3 to 11.x that introduced lag and throttling.
Pretty much every technology display is going to be simulated due to the need to be able to have things repeatable in a controlled environment.I don't get the simulated part though. If the images are simulated, then the whole thing is bogus. Do they think their customers are just too dumb to notice that? I am sure it's legal for them to market this way, but I just don't get who they are marketing to. I guess their customer base?
I am not sure why the "what's a computer" commercial got so much hate. I found it to be a refreshing take on how flexible technology is today and how youth adopting and utilizing technology pushes it forward. So much so that terminology that was once ubiquitous is now becoming less and less applicable to the devices we use most. This is why I was so happy that Apple rededicated itself to education.
As for the commercial, I could care less. I really only concern myself with Samsung enough to keep up with whether they will ever have to pay the billion dollars or so that was awarded to Apple for their copying the original phone design. I might buy a Samsung TV too. So there is that.
I wonder if supporter to this strategy of comparing a 4 year old phone to the new one when the general public is not versed in which iPhone model is which, would be supportive of Apple using the same strategy next week, comparing the iPhone 10 to the Samsung exploding phones as if they are thier currently device? Except in the fine print of course.The strategy is; if you still own an iPhone 6, you should upgrade.
No different than apple telling you to upgrade your old phone.
Trying to get someone to sell a new phone for your new phone just doesn't wrk.
Pretty much every technology display is going to be simulated due to the need to be able to have things repeatable in a controlled environment.
Just bad at doing both it seems.Yet they specifically point out that it's iPhone 6 with actual headlines in that commercial.
If they were trying to do that they wouldn't undercut themselves by specifically referring to it as iPhone 6 in the commercial. Either they aren't doing that, or they are really bad at doing it.
Nope! That would be the Galaxy S5 & Galaxy Note 4! The Note 4 is still a very decent phone by today's standards. Samsung should've showed off their 4 year old Note 4. I laughed when I saw they were comparing an S9 to Apple's iPhone 6.Whatever Samsung phone came out the year of the iPhone 6 is probably significantly slower. This ad would only make sense if they were implying that their devices can maintain strong performance for 4 years, and somehow prove it.
I also can't imagine how frustrated her mom would be when she starts having green bubble messages with her daughter!
costumers? Who is wearing a costume?Apple deserved it. Be honest with your costumers next time.
The 6 didn't seem slow when it first came out - the slowness is largely the result of the successive updates to iOS, necessitating more memory and faster processing. This isn't generally as much of an issue with Android phones, as they get very few updates in system software.That is not accurate. It is as bad as Samsung portrays. The wife used my old 6+ for a week while we waited for parts for her battery repair for her 6s to come in (I messed up the tape that came in the kit). She commented how slow that phone was. Almost to the point that she said she did nothing other than phone calls and texts. That throttling is BS and really, really bad.
I pull out the old Galaxy S5 from time to time as it's the spare phone now. It's slow but nowhere near as bad as the iPhone. Need to get it to Apple for a $29 battery and sell it.
You mean like a shed of Apple ads over the last few years...Lazy.
Would have a lot more respect for Samsung if they made a ‘positive’ advert, pushing the qualities of their device.
This sort of negative advertising, just criticising the competition, is lazy, dull, and frankly a bit pathetic in these modern times.
Tellingly, Apple doesn't make Mac vs. PC ads these days. PCs were easy targets back then - not so much anymore, given Mac directions lately.Like the “I’m a Mac” and “I’m a PC” advertisement campaign?
Whatever Samsung phone came out the year of the iPhone 6 is probably significantly slower. This ad would only make sense if they were implying that their devices can maintain strong performance for 4 years, and somehow prove it.
I also can't imagine how frustrated her mom would be when she starts having green bubble messages with her daughter!
costumers? Who is wearing a costume?