I don't know anyone who swore by the small screen. Just about everyone wanted a larger screen. And Apple caved and delivered.
I swear by the 4" screen. This iPhone 6 keeps slipping out of my pocket.
I don't know anyone who swore by the small screen. Just about everyone wanted a larger screen. And Apple caved and delivered.
Interesting use of the word "never".![]()
I'll give you the phone and the headphones, but the rest... come on, your examples come across as ridiculous as Apple's stupid patents.
The box and accessory design - it's a white box. They don't look identical. Heck the headphone accessory box isn't the same.
The fingerprint scanner: White background. Seriously?
stock keyboard: Again, maybe the color scheme? The keyboard isn't identical either. Samsung includes 0-9 keys, while Apple makes you hold down some keys.
Samsung Wallet: There are a lot of apps that have that design.
Samsung Pay: sure the name is similar, but samsung acquired LoopPay. You could say that Samsung Pay is copying Apple, or maybe they just took out the "Loop" and replaced it with their name.
Oh please. some Apple fans are just ironic. They swore by Apple's no large screen phone and made fun of Samsung's Note series for its huge size. But the moment Apple threw in the 6+, you readily paid for it because you wanted a larger phone.
But then again, you seem to be praising Apple with your post. Wake up and smell the reality, Apple isn't as innovative as you think. They copied and stole ideas too. They got patents for ridiculous reasons like the shape of a phone. I mean they got a patent on a stair design too!
Remember when Dell tried to rip off Apple's Macbook design video by hiring another guy with a foreign accent to explain the design process behind Dell Adamo?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cpMHEqtoUQ
This was in 2009. Adamo went down in history as one of the worst Dell products.
I personally have never seen an advertisement where Apple has mentioned Samsung's name negatively in an actual commercial or ad.
The thing is, it'll work because 99% of the people who'll watch that video won't have compared it to anything Apple has done. So to them it'll seem like a cool original video. And Samsung will look incredibly creative.
who cares. look at the actual designs.
And if that is indeed mocking, that speaks to the company's desperation. And likely its poor financial results.
And what of the Braun (branded) watch from waaay back in 2011, which just happens to employ a side button and scroll wheel? Inspiration of course..."from an entirely different product"... L-effin'-O-L!
The S6 Edge still looks better than the iPhone, IMO. And funny enough, I'm not the only person who says that. And Rene Ritchie's articles are biased AF anyway. Samsung could come out with a phone that literally prints money out of thin air and Rene would still come up with some random lame reason why Samsung sucks and the iPhone is the best. Can't take that guy serious until he takes off the blatant fanboy iHat.
Sept. 2016 response: Clearly Apple was the first to introduce the dual curved screen. Samsung infiltrated Apple with Korean spies who relayed the information to Samsung via noodles and tea (encryption at it's highest).
Oct. 2016 response: Ok fine, Apple may have taken the general idea from Samsung with the curved screen, but they made it more better. They improved on it so clearly it's new and better. Samsung's edge was a POS while Apple's clearly has purpose. Thought was put into this.
Nov. 2016 response: Hmm ... well we don't use the edge that much in iPhone 7. But it isn't a gimmicky feature, it has purpose to it. Apple envisioned greatness and this is certainly it.
----------
Because the phones they produce are pretty awesome.
I think the Manet/Picasso comparison doesn't really make much sense in the context of the products in this thread. In modern painting ( and Manet is already close to modern painting period), the subject is considered very secondary, it's called "figure imposée" in academic painting. It's a bit like standards in jazz.
These are figures that everyone uses , standard figures ( that includes things like bowl of fruits, people sitting in a chair near a window, elongated semi-nude ( or nude ) women bodies lying on a bed, etc..) . There must be hundreds of thousands of great paintings representing the same bowl of fruit. They are not copying or stealing the painting, because it's a standard figure. Picasso is not stealing or even copying the "déjeuner sur l'herbe" from Manet, he is using a standard.
The S6 Edge is a better piece of hardware than the iPhone 6, most everyone that has handled both say that.
Well they did come up with the Edge. So there is that. Although it's not a phone for me, the design looks damn good in person. Sorry bud, not getting into a profit discussion. That changes the focus and doesn't actually contribute to the topic.
In a way, what Ive is doing with Braun is almost the opposite. He is taking the same design and imposing a different theme ( utility ) on it. Wich does indeed take a lot of creativity. It's not that obvious to contemplate the shape of say, an oven, and imagine those parts serving a different function, such as parts of a computer.
Well in fairness he could be a British 'bloke' who has been asked to say aluminum the American way for the American market.