Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Interesting use of the word "never". ;)

I used never because I personally have never seen an advertisement where Apple has mentioned Samsung's name negatively in an actual commercial or ad.

Please by all means show me one. I was trying to look for one, and couldn't.
 
I'll give you the phone and the headphones, but the rest... come on, your examples come across as ridiculous as Apple's stupid patents.

The box and accessory design - it's a white box. They don't look identical. Heck the headphone accessory box isn't the same.

The fingerprint scanner: White background. Seriously?

stock keyboard: Again, maybe the color scheme? The keyboard isn't identical either. Samsung includes 0-9 keys, while Apple makes you hold down some keys.

Samsung Wallet: There are a lot of apps that have that design.

Samsung Pay: sure the name is similar, but samsung acquired LoopPay. You could say that Samsung Pay is copying Apple, or maybe they just took out the "Loop" and replaced it with their name.

If you pretend to be blind, no one can force you to see ...
 
working for the marketing division for samsung must be the cushiest job in advertising. tap fingers on desk, wait for apple announcement then get to work and copy. Sheesh.
 
Oh please. some Apple fans are just ironic. They swore by Apple's no large screen phone and made fun of Samsung's Note series for its huge size. But the moment Apple threw in the 6+, you readily paid for it because you wanted a larger phone.

But then again, you seem to be praising Apple with your post. Wake up and smell the reality, Apple isn't as innovative as you think. They copied and stole ideas too. They got patents for ridiculous reasons like the shape of a phone. I mean they got a patent on a stair design too!

U kidding right? Enlarging screen size is NOT the same thing is copying colour elements, phone design, icons, packaging, plugs, ear buds and even advertisement! If you can't see this, you will never!
Aren't there other android companies who make cool phones? Sure! Most of them at least have the courage and integrity of presenting good design (apart from Lenovo and some Chinese brands). I hope those Chinese copycats finish beating shamedung in their own pathetic game.
 
Remember when Dell tried to rip off Apple's Macbook design video by hiring another guy with a foreign accent to explain the design process behind Dell Adamo?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cpMHEqtoUQ

This was in 2009. Adamo went down in history as one of the worst Dell products.

"Honest materials that have a certain temperature to them that comes from being real metal and real glass". Haha this is parody gold, except it's not parody. :eek:
 
It's funny that lately they are copying the things people laugh at Apple for. Those Ives videos are always mocked because of how rediculous they are. They also copy the non replaceable battery, non waterproof, and no expanded storage as well. Almost like they think Apple sells more because of reputation and not features
 
I personally have never seen an advertisement where Apple has mentioned Samsung's name negatively in an actual commercial or ad.

That little modifier makes all the difference! :)

_________________________

(I'm really not a grammar nazi at heart, so I apologize if you took offence - - it was just that your two uses of "never" building on each other that struck me funny. Cheers!)
 
Last edited:
They copy everybody & everything, not just Apple.
Look at their other products.
Example - I recently had to replace my washing machine. We had a Miele that died early. The replacement machine we went with is almost identical to the Miele. The Samsung cost was cheaper than the repair of the Miele. And this Miele that died didn't live up to the last one we owned.
I've also looked at some of the other products by Samsung. They look and feel like some other companies products.
Could some one inform me of an original product by Samsung?
 
The thing is, it'll work because 99% of the people who'll watch that video won't have compared it to anything Apple has done. So to them it'll seem like a cool original video. And Samsung will look incredibly creative.

Yeah exactly… That's their business model these days. Copy something flat out and save on R&D, allocate a huge marketing budget and put it in front of a bunch of people's faces who won't know, and will actually think they are innovative, and then enjoy a massive profit while it takes years to move through the courts. It is blatant hucksterism.
 
God, I hate copy cats so much!!!!

Image

Not one of those items (excluding possibly the Hi-Fi) are in the same product class; inspiration is not the same as copying (no dog in the fight, just saying its a poor example).
 
who cares. look at the actual designs.

The S6 Edge still looks better than the iPhone, IMO. And funny enough, I'm not the only person who says that. And Rene Ritchie's articles are biased AF anyway. Samsung could come out with a phone that literally prints money out of thin air and Rene would still come up with some random lame reason why Samsung sucks and the iPhone is the best. Can't take that guy serious until he takes off the blatant fanboy iHat.
 
And what of the Braun (branded) watch from waaay back in 2011, which just happens to employ a side button and scroll wheel? Inspiration of course..."from an entirely different product"... L-effin'-O-L!

The Braun watch is... a watch. It can tell the time and maybe the date.

The Apple Watch is a multi-fuction computer on your wrist. It's no more a "watch" than an iPhone is a "phone".
 
The S6 Edge still looks better than the iPhone, IMO. And funny enough, I'm not the only person who says that. And Rene Ritchie's articles are biased AF anyway. Samsung could come out with a phone that literally prints money out of thin air and Rene would still come up with some random lame reason why Samsung sucks and the iPhone is the best. Can't take that guy serious until he takes off the blatant fanboy iHat.

The S6 Edge is a better piece of hardware than the iPhone 6, most everyone that has handled both say that.
 
Sept. 2016 response: Clearly Apple was the first to introduce the dual curved screen. Samsung infiltrated Apple with Korean spies who relayed the information to Samsung via noodles and tea (encryption at it's highest).

Oct. 2016 response: Ok fine, Apple may have taken the general idea from Samsung with the curved screen, but they made it more better. They improved on it so clearly it's new and better. Samsung's edge was a POS while Apple's clearly has purpose. Thought was put into this.

Nov. 2016 response: Hmm ... well we don't use the edge that much in iPhone 7. But it isn't a gimmicky feature, it has purpose to it. Apple envisioned greatness and this is certainly it.

----------


Because the phones they produce are pretty awesome.

LOL those responses are pretty much spot on, especially the "Apple made it better" one lol
 
Wow. Copycat on the videos.

It won't be long until Samsung copies the whole software interface too.
samsung_before_after.png

That Apple trial graphic pretended that Samsung stopped making flip and other phones afterwards, and that they didn't have any all-touch phones available or in development. Samsung responded by pointing this out:

samsung_before_after2.png

Apple lawyers were so keen to claim Apple's designs as being unique, that they even included the pre-iPhone Samsung F700 design as evidence of "copying" before realizing their embarrassing mistake:

samsung_phone_concepts.png

Also interesting was the "IReen" touch UI that Samsung had been developing the year before the iPhone. Apple lawyers bent over backwards to have their images banned from the California trial, because they would prove that Apple's ideas were not unique. The jurors never got to see it:

samsung_ui_concept.png

For that matter, it's known that in mid 2005 Apple was still working on an iPod based iPhone. If you want to present biased before-and-after comparisons, let's look at the Korean-designed Pidion touch smartphone that came out shortly before Apple internally decided to change to all-touch:

after_pidion2.png

Unwired magazine even eerily correctly predicted that Apple might later use a similar design.

Naturally, Apple's lawyers also got the Pidion prior art evidence banned from the California jury. OTOH, in Europe where prior art such as the Pidion evidence was allowed, Apple lost their iPhone design infringement claims against Samsung. It was clear that Apple's design was NOT unique.

As for copying software, don't even get people started on the features that Apple has copied from Android. Or for that matter, originally from people like Jeff Han and his multi-touch demo. Everyone takes the best ideas from each other, and we all benefit. The difference is that Apple often tries to claim them as theirs alone.
 
I think the Manet/Picasso comparison doesn't really make much sense in the context of the products in this thread. In modern painting ( and Manet is already close to modern painting period), the subject is considered very secondary, it's called "figure imposée" in academic painting. It's a bit like standards in jazz.

These are figures that everyone uses , standard figures ( that includes things like bowl of fruits, people sitting in a chair near a window, elongated semi-nude ( or nude ) women bodies lying on a bed, etc..) . There must be hundreds of thousands of great paintings representing the same bowl of fruit. They are not copying or stealing the painting, because it's a standard figure. Picasso is not stealing or even copying the "déjeuner sur l'herbe" from Manet, he is using a standard.

Nonsense. In this case, Picasso was clearly referencing that famous painting, and in fact created many versions of it - in his own distinct style.
 
The S6 Edge is a better piece of hardware than the iPhone 6, most everyone that has handled both say that.

As a person who owns both phones, the S6 Edge is just and all around better device...from the screen to camera to the overall design. Hell one of my best buds was TeamApple and I'm talking hardcore. Dude now has an S6 and loves it. I hope this forces Apple to come out swinging with the next gen iPhone. Competition is great for us customers.
 
Well they did come up with the Edge. So there is that. Although it's not a phone for me, the design looks damn good in person. Sorry bud, not getting into a profit discussion. That changes the focus and doesn't actually contribute to the topic.

Who's Bud? There is nothing innovative about the Edge.

Manufacturers have been playing around with curved screens in various product formats for years. The reason nobody else is making phones in this form-factor is because it makes the UI look very thick and dated.

If anything it feels like a forced attempt to stand out without any real substance.

You might not want to discuss profit, but Samsung's most recent numbers aren't giving their flagship designs (or their aggressive and angry supporters) much credibility.
 
In a way, what Ive is doing with Braun is almost the opposite. He is taking the same design and imposing a different theme ( utility ) on it. Wich does indeed take a lot of creativity. It's not that obvious to contemplate the shape of say, an oven, and imagine those parts serving a different function, such as parts of a computer.

Obvious? No. And yet the world is full of great designs that can serve as inspiration to product designers. However companies like Samsung, for whom design is an afterthought, lack the courage and skill required to explore and experiment with such ideas. It's much easier and safer to copy a successful product than to come up with one on your own from scratch.

----------

Well in fairness he could be a British 'bloke' who has been asked to say aluminum the American way for the American market.

What would be the point of hiring a voice actor with an English accent only to instruct him to pronounce things like an American?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.