Apple should stop giving money to these bottom feeders. Make your own fabrication labs Apple.
Be patient. Good things come to those who wait.
Apple should stop giving money to these bottom feeders. Make your own fabrication labs Apple.
I trust we both read enough trade press for you to appreciate that I neither keep all those URLs in my head nor have the time to attempt to replace Google.TSMC's fab issues are well known, but can you cite something regarding Samsung's yields? (especially on equivalent processes)
I have my opinions based on over two decades as a continuing and very loyal Apple customer.Wow. You are on the wrong side of every thought.
I trust we both read enough trade press for you to appreciate that I neither keep all those URLs in my head nor have the time to attempt to replace Google.
For those in doubt, consider TSMC's field trip to Cupertino a few months back, and how in spite of that Cook increased orders with Samsung just a few weeks later.
Now it could be that Cook's an idiot, giving money to someone he's suing even though TSMC could step in at any time for less. Or not.
A far more interesting question is what will happen to all of the ARM fabs if Intel's able to come through on their claim of 11nm by 2014? x86 with 50% more battery life seem an interesting combo....
4 bil for a fence around the roof and a fence in every window...
Samsung & Apple are actually quite similar in some aspects.Samsung is an excellent maker of goods but it is very opposite of "class". The only reason Samsung gets love is that people are pitting them against the current evil empire(Apple) and they aren't a USA corporation so most aren't aware of their wrong doings. If Samsung was a USA company, they'll be one of most hated names....<snip>[/URL]?
SoC? LOL... You mean Apple telling Samsung what clockspeeds they want and Samsung doing the intelligent work of figuring out which components go where and fabricating them?
Designed? You mean assembled... I can buy PC parts like an intel CPU and an AMD GPU and put them all together in a plastic box to make my PC. That doesn't mean I designed the PC blueprint...
SoC? LOL... You mean Apple telling Samsung what clockspeeds they want and Samsung doing the intelligent work of figuring out which components go where and fabricating them?
Again, stop thinking that Apple is run by geniuses. Most Apple employees have average (Or maybe even below average) intelligence who'll never pass a freshmen engineering curriculum in their lives or their next 50,000 lives.
Kudos for Texas for continuing to attract companies to expand, build new facilities, and promote growth. It's amazing what a business-friendly climate will do for a state.
It's a bit more involved than that. Apple actually has pretty good internal expertise on designing SoCs from their PA Semi acquisition. They mostly take ARM and Imagination Technology designs for CPUs and GPUs and design a single die solution with a few added bits (memory controller, USB controller, etc...). They hand off pretty much a complete design to Samsung who just does the manufacturing part for it.
Samsung's internal SoC designs (the Exynos line-up) differs from Apple in choices of integrated GPU and controllers.
Based on my trip to Austin last week, the city needs more freeways before it needs new jobs.![]()
Kudos for Texas for continuing to attract companies to expand, build new facilities, and promote growth. It's amazing what a business-friendly climate will do for a state.
Apple should try to build something in the US. Not putting down Apple, HP should try it too.
The comparison is off though because the industry isn't the same one. Samsung isn't making mobile phones, laptops or TVs in the USA. They are making chips and as others have mentioned in this thread, other chip makers such as Intel and AMD already have plants in the USA. Plus Samsung is getting a tax break as well.
It's not just Apple. HP, Dell, Google, Motorola, Microsoft, etc, all make their mass produced goods overseas.
Samsung's mobile division and semiconductor division operate completely separately. So the business decisions of mobile do not impact semiconductor. Samsung would lose a ton of money if Apple stopped using their semiconductor as a supplier. Samsung really leads mobile chip production compared to other companies out there. When intel catches up in a few years, it may be a different story.
I've worked for a large company where one of our divisions supplied parts to a competitor of the division I worked in. Each business unit has their own goals on getting the most revenue as possible. It is rare to have one division to give up profits to make another division happy.
Thank you. THIS is EXACTLY the point!! Something most people don't understand, Samsung divisions are competing very hard often even to the detriment of the other division (mobile vs. semiconductor).
No they're not but their products can be assembled here they choose not to. It's shame and something this country could use. I'm quite pleased with Samsung for doing this. Next time I'm looking for a piece of electronics I will look in Samsung's direction first.
Samsung does produce the majority of its phones in its home country Korea though. My galaxy nexus was made in south Korea and not in the cheaper labor china.
Precisely.And x86 is x86.
Precisely.
An x86 instruction set offering both unbeatable performance on the desktop and unbeatable energy savings in mobile devices would surely shake things up a bit for the ARM consortium, and open up many new opportunities to device makers.
So you think Intel can produce a new x86 ISA that promotes both legacy compliance and a less register dependent methodology that is comparable in IPC with ARM? I don't.
About 80% of Samsung phones are made outside Korea in countries with cheaper labor, especially the low end ones.
So you think Intel can produce a new x86 ISA that promotes both legacy compliance and a less register dependent methodology that is comparable in IPC with ARM? I don't.