Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In order for the above to be valid statement you would need to show that the two groups mentioned are one in the same.
Otherwise it just hyperbole.

I don't mean to imply that they are the same. That wouldn't be ironic, it would be hypocritical. I'm just pointing out the humour in the fact that one group wishes they could get updates, and another group gets them regularly but avoids them. One man's trash is another's treasure.
[doublepost=1533160034][/doublepost]
of course it does depend on what you want to do. For people using email, Netflix, web research and browsing, editing a few movies or pictures, using spreadsheets and Word processors, drawing, taking notes, its perfect. Programming, using as a workstation, database support, yah, it's too limited.

That's the kind of usage that you don't need such a high-end expensive tablet for anyway. That goes back to an earlier comment I made that there should be more tablets in the class of the 2018 non-pro iPad. Now everything is a super premium tablet that is supposed to be a "computer" or a really cheap Amazon tablet that's just a simple media consumption device.
 
This doesn't compete with iPad. Lack of ecosystem, accessories, and integration with other iOS and Mac devices. Once you've mastered Handoff and Continuity, there's no reason to mess with something like this.

They should have had a tab that ran Android OS and then switched to Chrome OS when docked. That would have at least been unique.

But it has a mouse
 
Define hardly? Because in my area, iPads are prevalent in the public school systems (And colleges), doctors offices, government buildings, restaurants, coffee shops, airports, ect. Especially in the educational sector, iPads have grown exponentially for students. So you can’t say that unless you have specific examples of why ‘hardly anyone buys them’, when you have multiple industries that invest in them for productivity.
I have never seen an iPad in doctor's office. They all use PCs. If they used iPads, the typing would take forever and the cost of medical care would skyrocket. Educational sector has long switched to Chromebooks (and you have not noticed). People in the coffee shops use phones. Nobody brings a tablet with them just to drink coffee. Peak iPad happened in 2014, its sales have been declining ever since.

Personally I still find tablets useful but for limited purposes - Internet browsing and some (limited) media consumption.
 
This doesn't compete with iPad. Lack of ecosystem, accessories, and integration with other iOS and Mac devices. Once you've mastered Handoff and Continuity, there's no reason to mess with something like this.

They should have had a tab that ran Android OS and then switched to Chrome OS when docked. That would have at least been unique.

Tablet should be really poorly designed if it needs an "ecosystem" to be useful. I have never seen a tablet used with any accessories (which are not a case).
[doublepost=1533160440][/doublepost]
Samsung must match Apple item for item.
Otherwise their Execs can’t sleep at night.
They can’t afford another iPhone.
Notice they went with 10.5”. Why not 11”?
Samsung was making 10.5" tablets long ago. Galaxy Note Tab 2014 had this form factor.
 
Irony is universal. Doesn't mean that everyone will be in a position to appreciate it. If your Samsung tablet is unusable because of lack of updates, it's definitely ironic that many iPad users avoid regular updates because they fear they will do exactly the same thing.
Universal like ignorance.
To make it clear for you: in case of iPad there is something to be affected, i.e. performance. What we can not say about the Android tablets in question that don't get an update for years, thus becoming unusable - amongst others - because of the incompatibility of applications.
 
Universal like ignorance.
To make it clear for you: in case of iPad there is something to be affected, i.e. performance. What we can not say about the Android tablets in question that don't get an update for years, thus becoming unusable - amongst others - because of the incompatibility of used applications.

There is a big difference between iOS and Android in this regard. Most old versions of Android (except for like 10 year old ones) can run the latest apps.
 
Universal like ignorance.
To make it clear for you: in case of iPad there is something to be affected, i.e. performance. What we can not say about the Android tablets in question that don't get an update for years, thus becoming unusable - amongst others - because of the incompatibility of applications.

You don't have to explain anything to me. I was just pointing out how different users feel about their platform of choice's update situation, justifiably or not.
 
There is a big difference between iOS and Android in this regard. Most old versions of Android (except for like 10 year old ones) can run the latest apps.
The tablets in question ran Gingerbread (2.3). Applications either updated, but would not run under 2.3 or could not be updated at all because of OS incompatibility.
When the most important applications were affected in the manner described above time came to give up on the tablets.
[doublepost=1533161572][/doublepost]
You don't have to explain anything to me. I was just pointing out how different users feel about their platform of choice's update situation, justifiably or not.
There was no intention to explain to you anything, but to point out the irrelevance of a statement.
 
Universal like ignorance.
To make it clear for you: in case of iPad there is something to be affected, i.e. performance. What we can not say about the Android tablets in question that don't get an update for years, thus becoming unusable - amongst others - because of the incompatibility of applications.

Wrong. Android app compatibility isn't nearly as bad as iOS. Android 5.x Lollipop from 2014 runs virtually everything. For comparison, iOS 7.x from 2014 won't run a lot of apps.
 
This thread is so full of negative comments... it almost strikes me the wrong way, as though people here are in denial. I think Samsung has delivered a quality tablet for their customer base, of which I'm not a member of. I recently purchased an iPad that runs our second retail store, and will be upgrade our first store to the iPad-based checkout system later this year. :)

Tablets have their place, and definitely not just for media consumption or "play".
[doublepost=1533163287][/doublepost]
Wrong. Android app compatibility isn't nearly as bad as iOS. Android 5.x Lollipop from 2014 runs virtually everything. For comparison, iOS 7.x from 2014 won't run a lot of apps.

That's more to do with streamlining to 64-bit app, dropping support for 32-bit apps. Yes, there are some victims in that process, but in the long run, it's better for everyone.
 
You should've scrolled three lines. Surprisingly post #86 contains important information, i.e. the OS in question which is Gingerbread.

Still wrong. Google Play Store no longer supports it but you can still sideload and run more apps on 2011 Android Gingerbread 2.3 vs 2012 iOS 5.1.1 that's also no longer supported by Apple App Store but can't sideload apps and even if you can majority aren't compatible.
 
Last edited:
The tablets in question ran Gingerbread (2.3). Applications either updated, but would not run under 2.3 or could not be updated at all because of OS incompatibility.
When the most important applications were affected in the manner described above time came to give up on the tablets.
[doublepost=1533161572][/doublepost]
There was no intention to explain to you anything, but to point out the irrelevance of a statement.
Gingerbread was released in 2010.
 
When I had a jailbroken iPad I used a mouse with it for text editing... so much better... wish Apple would just offer this option, selecting text with a finger is slow and annoying
 
  • Like
Reactions: metalsiren
This thread is typical of so many device discussion topics on this site.

“I don’t use it, it’s not a relevant technology and so yesterday.”

Followed by ; “ What are you, blind?”

The reason tablet growth/sales is flat is people can hold on to them for 3-5 years and don’t upgrade every 12 months with an unlimited plan.

However I see no productivity uses for an Android tablet but Samsung makes damn nice displays on their devices.
 
I bought a Samsung 10.1 inch tablet one year. It had just been released and it was their higher end tablet. I had to replace it after a day as the case kept clicking when I picked it up.

Next one was ok. However it kept getting g bogged down. I kept checking for an OS Update. About a year later, there was still no updates. The OS it had was now two versions behind the current release. I kept checking and checking. The one day I see an update, the tablet, after 1 year was no longer supported. I now no longer even think of Getting something other than apple. All the other companies are about worthless in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
No interest in any tablet running Android, but I do like the optional mouse support and capability of USB-C. I think the iPad Pro should add those at this point. Especially when the entry level iPad is so good now.
 
Still wrong. You can still sideload and run more apps on 2011 Android Gingerbread 2.3 vs 2012 iOS 5.1.1 that can't sideload apps and even if you can majority aren't compatible.
There are apps that don't work on lower level API.
Google Play Services does not support Gingerbread since 2017.
Gingerbread was released in 2010.
It is a known fact. Anybody provided wrong data in this respect?
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.