Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Imagine if it was with the iPhone. Apple is doomed and over all news.

That snapdragon, xxx cpu, xxx ram, x cores and still way slower than the iPhone 6S (year old cpu).


Sssh. No, don't worry. This only affects a small number of devices and Samsung are just taking the reputationally and financially ruinous step of recalling every phone globally because... um, reasons. Carry on, citizen.
 
Again, if it's a limited run, why recall them all? Remember the thread is called in "Samsung Expected to Announce Recall of New Galaxy Note 7 Due to Exploding Batteries" and not "B..B..But Apple have had QC issues too". Thanks.

A good rule of thumb is to always read the source article.

That reporter was speculating about a full recall, when the quotes from the Samsung spokesperson said no such thing. Samsung said:

"Products installed with the problematic battery account for less than 0.1 percent of the entire volume sold. The problem can be simply resolved by changing the battery, but we'll come up with convincing measures for our consumers."

"We don't have any intention to delay (the announcement) or hide (the result of investigation). The decision will be made in consideration of maximum consumer benefit."

Apparently from "maximum consumer benefit", the reporter made this part up all on his own:

His remarks suggested that Samsung may recall all of the Galaxy Note 7 phablets sold at home and abroad.

Maybe it's a translation difference, but I don't think his remarks "suggested" anything of the sort. Sounds more like they're going to give Gear watches or some other gift away with the replacements as extra compensation.
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't it be funny if it was discovered, that through some manufacturing defect or even a design flaw, that the audio jack was the cause of the battery to overheat.
I don't think you can find that much concentrated irony in the wild, pretty sure it has to be manufactured in those quantities.
 
A good rule of thumb is to always read the source article.

Both the reporter there, and here, were speculating a full recall, when the quotes from the Samsung spokesperson said no such thing. He said:

"Products installed with the problematic battery account for less than 0.1 percent of the entire volume sold. The problem can be simply resolved by changing the battery, but we'll come up with convincing measures for our consumers."

"We don't have any intention to delay (the announcement) or hide (the result of investigation). The decision will be made in consideration of maximum consumer benefit."

Apparently after reading "maximum consumer benefit", the reporter made this part up all on his own:

His remarks suggested that Samsung may recall all of the Galaxy Note 7 phablets sold at home and abroad.

I don't think it "suggested" anything of the sort. Sounds more like they're going to give Gear watches away with the replacements or some other gift.

Well lets see, shall we, and come back to this. Reports are all over the web (and even in this thread from people trying to buy them) are that Samsung are already completely halting sales. This small run of devices could easily be identified by their serial at the vendor so why take this measure?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1041958
Well lets see, shall we, and come back to this.

Fair enough.

Reports are all over the web (and even in this thread from people trying to buy them) are that Samsung are already completely halting sales. This small run of devices could easily be identified by their serial at the vendor so why take this measure?

The web is terrible information source, because bloggers/reporters are lazy and will repeat old info forever.

Checking closer, it looks like shipments were stopped earlier this week when they didn't know yet what was wrong. So that's old news that was reported before Samsung figured out the problem source, and might be incorrectly repeated now.

Interestingly, it appears that the majority of the units affected were sold in Korea, with a lesser amount making it to other countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjohnstone
Cue the Samsung haters in 3...2...1...

(for the record, I believe that some form of this issue has been seen by every major manufacturer - and isn't this part of the reason for the change in rules regarding transporting Li-Ion batteries?)
Yes Li Ion batteries are highly unstable to under and over voltage or internal defects to battery. Hopefully the supplier of these batteries is not also supplying the iPhone 7. Planes have caught fire due to backup batteries as well as cargo. These batteries contain a lot of potential energy, that when released suddenly catch fire and even explode.

I was reading about new Li Ion battery that doesn't do this due to it's construction and chemistry. Hope they can get this new type into overall manufacturing soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flow39
it looks like shipments were stopped earlier this week when they didn't know yet what was wrong

What's your source on this? Now that they do know what's wrong, don't you think it's rather strange that they would continue not to sell their most expensive flagship?

By the way it was the Samsung official himself who used the word recall, if you check the article

The official said the company's announcement of the recall is unlikely on Friday because Samsung is in talks with Verizon of the U.S. and other business partners on the issue

Which doesn't say there definitely will be a recall, but stop well short of saying there won't. I'm not in PR but, as messaging goes, it doesn't exactly inspire customer confidence. Let's hope no-one gets seriously injured while they mull it over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueParadox
Can your iPhone do this?

nuclear-bomb.jpg
Actually yes it can. Any device with LI Ion battery has potential to do this unfortunately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Say what you want, but Apple has a history of making good on their products.

Hell, they're still accepting recalls for the 1st gen iPod nano. Told a co worker who found one in her drawer and Apple sent her a new 7G nano in 3 days.

When Apple does a recall/repair, they are second to none in terms of service. Will these Note7 users get loaner phones? I got a loaner phone for my iPhone5 sleep button problem.

My comment literally had nothing to do with Apple's customer service... or Samsung's, for that matter. I was merely speculating about the issue being traced back to a supplier that Apple also uses, and not even lightly suggesting that was the case.

How did you interpret my comment as negative at all? Or are you just making points out of nothing for the point of one-upping?

Edit: Nevermind, you just happened to see something neutral/positive about Samsung so you decided to make a point out of something I didn't say just to make Apple seem better by comparison. Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kdarling
I don't. You considder this decision as something rare, and "brave" while I considder this as the only way on how to deal with potentional timebombs.

It's a strange world when people start to think this decision is something special or brave or anything associated with odd while this is just the only thing a company could do. Unless you as a company consider unethical decisions as the norm.
Exactly correct. Right now anyone else using that supplier's batteries is sweating big time. Hopefully it can be traced to a single lot and or manufacturing date. and the reason uncovered.

Since the phone in question was being charged, not only is the battery suspect. Could also relate to charging circuit in phone, the power adapter, or anything else that might invoke an over voltage condition. Would be interesting to know if other instances were also during charging.
 
You came to the wrong place
Oh my gosh, story of my life up in here.....
[doublepost=1472766786][/doublepost]
You care about Li Ion batteries? You use them every device you have.

No I don't. There will always be small batches of batteries that have problems and more prone to fires. It's not news it's fu****** sensationalism and click bait. That's the internet we have now, I don't have to like it. Less than .1 percent! I realize that's going to be a lot of phones hopefully they can track it better by serial number, but it doesn't need to be front page news on a blog not even related to Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjohnstone
Sadly, folks will attach "-gate" to any sort of situation these days, looking to cast someone in a bad light with almost no actual effort expended. It's kind of an unimaginative cheap way out on coining a name for some event. No points awarded for originality.

Just think, what if, instead of the "Watergate Hotel", the original break-in had happened at the "Holiday Inn"? What would folks be using for cheap shots these days?
Most of the people using the term don't even know how it came about, or the Watergate break-in and cover up bringing down the Nixon administration. Just bunch of parrots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ and Sonmi451
"What is this? GalaxyNote7Rumors?!"

No, it's called click bait. The lowest form of blogging for a buck. MR must be desperate for an advertising dollar. I use ad blocker so they can keep begging. P.S, not a samsung fan at all but these forums have become a joke.
 
Gotta say, good on 'em. This has to be a hard decision because the Note 7 is getting universal praise and high sales. Couple this with undercutting Apple by getting it to the market before the iPhone 7. But good on 'em for seeing a problem and taking a huge loss and trying to get out in front of this thing.

Good on them for not wanting to get sued to oblivion
 
No, it's called click bait. The lowest form of blogging for a buck. MR must be desperate for an advertising dollar. I use ad blocker so they can keep begging. P.S, not a samsung fan at all but these forums have become a joke.

basically this. I think I started coming here in 2002 when it was pretty small. They certainly aren't desperate for money, they have boat loads. Arn is stupid rich. I think they make $200 million a year or something but sold out in the process. 90% of content here is useless clickbait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Feenician
No, it's called click bait. The lowest form of blogging for a buck. MR must be desperate for an advertising dollar. I use ad blocker so they can keep begging. P.S, not a samsung fan at all but these forums have become a joke.

To be fair, unlike most of the Samsung (and seemingly almost exclusively Samsung, as opposed to other Android OEMs) stuff that at least seemed somewhat newsworthy. You know what didn't, tacked on to the end of the "article"?

Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 features a 2,560×1,440 Super AMOLED dual curved display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 quad-core 64-bit 14nm processor, 4GB of RAM, 12-megapixel Dual Pixel rear-facing camera, wireless charging, an iris scanner, IP68-rated waterproofing, and a 3,500 mAh battery.

Why is this here?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.