Am I wrong in assuming that you were seemingly taking a potshot at Samsung while trying to "exonerate" Apple.
People have different expectations - fair or not from different companies. But more importantly - just because someone questions one company doesn't mean they are obligated to question another.
That's called bias. The only time you wouldn't question the other is if you already know the answer or trust the company's long standing reputation in the field to already have a solid solution.
In this case the answer is no on both counts.
Apple created a secure part of the processor to store info that most software cannot access. They said as much at launch. Is it really too much to ask of Samsung to be as transparent as well? I wouldn't think so if it were to hold MY fingerprints.
Last edited: