Nope.
They copied the idea of putting the fingerprint scanner in the home button, and according to the reviews, it doesn't work as well as it does on the iPhone.
Let me re-phase that for you.
"While this is macrumors, I'm glad this site occasionally post articles about Samsung as well."
Well, its official: the iPhone 6 will not have a larger display. For a 4.7 screen, it would need a 555 PPI. If Samsung could not increase their PPI beyond 441 for the S5, in fact they even lowered it by a little (and lets not forget they design and manufacture their own screens, thereby lowering component costs), then Apple will certainly not be able to do so while keeping their high profit margins on their flagship product. I guess well have to put up with the 4 size for at least the next 2 years...
Nope, that is NOT what I asked for or what was stated in the post I quoted, go away and try again....
Plus of those reports, two of them are someones 'opinion' and the Sophos one admitted Apple doesn't release information on malware etc in the App store.
I am.
I still have an LG 'dumb' phone. The screen is ~2" across and it shows me what I need; the number I'm calling or that's calling me. It fits in my pocket, is nearly indestructible, and does what I want; it makes calls. For anything else I use my iPad or Mac.
I suppose, when my current phone dies, I could adapt to a 4" iPhone screen, though it feels like I'm talking into a 2x4. As far as 5+' phones or phalets are concerned, no thanks. Too big, too hard to carry around, too awkward and fragile for stuffing in my jeans and heading out for who knows what. I might get an iPhone when the old LG bites the dust, that is if Apple still offers a 4" model. Better yet I might get used one with a 3.5" screen.
Does anybody really care ?
I certainly don't.
Apple was built on a rip-off. So don't start throwing around those statements on an Apple forum. They haven't had that many original ideas that were not acquired or modified versions of other devices.
We must define "germ" differently.It appears Droid fans seem to think when Steve quoted Picasso he meant stealing great ideas, when he meant seizing upon the germ of a great idea and making it wholly your own.
No, gold phones aren't new, but Apple's marketing power made them relevant in the public eye. As a result, other OEMs are adding the option. A case of attempting to play to what's popular with consumers - which happened to be brought on by an Apple offering.
I would've agreed with you if Apple's version of fingerprint scanner looked like the Atrix's, HTC's or even worked like Samsung's. But now that I have a 5S with TouchID, I dislike using my 5C and iPads without it.....
Its one of those things that in the next year or so, will be ubiquitous across my Apple devices. It won't be in a top 10 of things I care about in a smartphone - it'll simply be an expectation.
"Of course, my phone/tablet/laptop has TouchID."
If you don't care about certain news, you shouldn't waste your time reading it. And if a lot people who felt like you did the same, the people who run the site will notice there are less ''clicks'' on specific topics they post. They'll know there is less interest in these topics in question and they will start posting less and less of it.
I think that's a better solution. What you are doing is brining them more clicks (loaded ads etc.), i.e. giving sings you're interested into what they just posted.
It's odd that you and others seem to think that anyone who says non-negative things about a non-Apple product must be hired guns.Sammie's hired band of writers is out in force. It's really amusing to see that not a single one will acknowledge that for every Apple rumour Sammie is like the neurotic college kid "me too miss, me too, look I've got one of those or I'm planning to show you one by next week".
I'm enjoying reading this it's hilarious. Let the fun times roll. Let's see more.
Someday you'll feel that way about wireless charging and larger screens.That's the exact point. The TouchID (as well as so many other Apple features) are integrated so well they just feel seamless in your life. You just do them without conscious thought. But if they suddenly are not there like TouchID for the 5C and iPad you notice it.
That's the best way to invent technology. It's the improvements that in a year or two you won't even notice but are making your life better. The tech fits into your life and not the other way around.
Never read a MacRumors article have you?I've never seen so many foolish assumptions in such a small space.
Are you trying to be clueless or you really don't know? Apple never want to go for anything higher than Retina display because it's useless for human eyes to distinguish. So if the next iPhone has bigger screen, it can be 4.5" screen at 1280 x 720 or 4.8" at 1366 x 768 to make 326 dpi or in Apple's term "Retina Display". Who wants more dpi than 326 to drain battery without adding any value?
On first glance I thought, "How cool that those VR glasses also tell everybody else the time."
Sounds like developers are lazy a holes that want to do the least amount of work. If they want to develop Apps for Apple, they'll design them to whatever screen size Apple comes out with....or get a new job.Oh boy, lol. Neither of those resolutions conform to a 1:1 or 1:4 ratio of total pixels.
The iPhone 5/5S has 727,040 total pixels.
A 1280 x 720 screen has 921,600 total pixels.
A 1366 x 768 screen has 1,049,088 total pixels.
Remember that if the new screen does not conform to a 1:1 or 1:4 pixel ratio, developers will have to write 2 completely separate UIs, one for iPhone 6 and one for everything else (5/5S/4/4S/lower), increasing development cost/time and maintenance cost/time (and many developers would think the cross-platform cost would not be worth the benefit, or simply won't have the time to optimize their apps to work on each platform).
Sure they can make a screen that does not match the 1:4 pixel ratio, but then every single app will look like crap until developers re-master every graphic used in their apps, a change that is much greater than simply adding new pixels in the Y-direction as they did for the 5/5S, which some developers still haven't done for the 5/5S! And developers (including Apple themselves) will now have to create, support, and fix 2 completely separate UIs for the 4/4S/5/5S and the new 6, rather than simply creating, supporting, and fixing one UI that works for all 4/4S/5/5S/6 phones.
They have a distinct advantage in 3rd party apps over Android and making a change to the pixel ratio would introduce more crappy graphics/images/icons/UI in 3rd party apps, cause cross-platform/legacy support problems, create more work for developers, cause more bad ratings in the app store, and would greatly harm their competitive advantage, something they would not want to risk.
Who's the clueless one now?
Sounds like developers are lazy a holes that want to do the least amount of work. If they want to develop Apps for Apple, they'll design them to whatever screen size Apple comes out with....or get a new job.
...Or figure out the cost/benefit and move to where the cost/benefit is best, like any smart person would do.