It's exceptionally a horribly-designed product. Absolutely stupid after spending $2000 USD that customers have to look at certain angles to avoid the crease. 😂I love Apple, (and am a Shareholder 🙂), however the Galaxy Fold 3 is exceptional...try it
It's exceptionally a horribly-designed product. Absolutely stupid after spending $2000 USD that customers have to look at certain angles to avoid the crease. 😂I love Apple, (and am a Shareholder 🙂), however the Galaxy Fold 3 is exceptional...try it
Refreshing post. Why people can't see the good in brands they aren't loyal to blows my mind. Or why people are so loyal to just one brand. No wonder the market place is turning so monopolistic. Consumers will pay in the long run.I love Apple, (and am a Shareholder 🙂), however the Galaxy Fold 3 is exceptional...try it
I didn't say Samsung phones were junk because Apple didn't make them. They're just junk period such as that folding toy nonsense. How embarrassing for Samsung to charge people $2000 for something that still leaves a crease in the middle.And you call out one or two models of there phones which are clearly still in the beta stage of their lifecycle? I applaud them for at least trying new things.
Using Samsung's screens don't take away the fact that Apple makes a better phone. Not sure why you're defending Samsung? Apple didn't put out a trolling tweet about Samsung. Every year it's the same thing. Samsung trashes Apple in ads and tweets and Apple says nothing in response. It just shows how threatened Samsung is.Who does Apple buy their displays from?
You're joking right? You too young to remember the multi year ads poking fun at PC's vs Macs? Neither those or what Samsung is doing is meant to be taken serious.Using Samsung's screens don't take away the fact that Apple makes a better phone. Not sure why you're defending Samsung? Apple didn't put out a trolling tweet about Samsung. Every year it's the same thing. Samsung trashes Apple in ads and tweets and Apple says nothing in response. It just shows how threatened Samsung is.
Obviously according to Samsung time doesn't matter. Their witty tweet of being first wouldn't have been posted if they didn't feel threatened to lose business to Apple. Facts are today Apple introduced some solid features for iPhone 13 Pro and it trumps the Samsung Crease.To be fair to Apple. This time they aren’t really that late. It’s only one generation behind Samsung.
I agree with your assessment completely, JGIGS. Samsung is a solid manufacturer and top 3, but I don't think they're as good as Apple, besides the screen. Android OS feels cheap to me.Get out of here with that rubbish. They don't make junk phones. They probably are at least top 3 brand in smart phone quality and golly they sure sell a lot of them so some people seem to like them.
When's the last time you've used one? Probably never? Do they make a better phone than Apple? I'd say that's subjective and heavily weighted on a persons preference for ecosystem and operating system.
I use all Apple products and don't go around calling any other brands product junk just because Apple didn't make.
And you call out one or two models of there phones which are clearly still in the beta stage of their lifecycle? I applaud them for at least trying new things.
Sigh. Since no one has corrected you yet, Samsung Displays and Samsung Mobile are separate entities . . .Who does Apple buy their displays from?
I'm suspecting you really didn't understand the Mac vs PC ads' mood, from Apple. They were and still are genius. They have nothing related to these embarrassing and desperate reactions from Samsung. It's clearly a move from an inferior company.You're joking right? You too young to remember the multi year ads poking fun at PC's vs Macs? Neither those or what Samsung is doing is meant to be taken serious.
So I guess Apple just has junk displays and whatever other parts Samsung supplies them then? Because you know a screen isn't important at all on a smartphone![]()
It was no variable offering 60 or 120. Then months later they offered some variation if selected but forced lower resolutions. Nothing like the 10-120 variable rates with auto selection based on use case and even the speed of finger swipes Apple released today. Samsung basically knew Apple was working on 120 because they supplied the test screens and rumors said it was coming last year, so they rushed to beat them to the punch as usual. This response was planned for months. They knew they had the screens but could not fathom how their implementation would blow them to kingdom come vMarch 2020 was awhile back. Generally can’t stand Samsung, but they’re right.
They are both innocent little fun jabs at a competitor. Please can people in here take their apple blinders off? Samsung actually promoted the iphone with that tweet. Free advertising. Why? Cuz they sell displays and other parts to make the iphone. They make money on iphone's and samsung products. Why are people in here having such a hard time understanding this? The term of this called tongue and cheek. Go look it up and maybe you'll get it. Both the old Apple ads and this tweet are forms of this granted the Apple adds come off more satirical because it's in video form.I'm suspecting you really didn't understand the Mac vs PC ads' mood, from Apple. They were and still are genius. They have nothing related to these embarrassing and desperate reactions from Samsung. It's clearly a move from an inferior company.
That's a fair opinion. Personally, I can't comment on which I think is a better operating system since I haven't used an Android smartphone in at least 5 years but in my experiences both iOs and Android have plusses and minuses vs. each other. But Apple seems to at least have an advantage with their processors at least.I agree with your assessment completely, JGIGS. Samsung is a solid manufacturer and top 3, but I don't think they're as good as Apple, besides the screen. Android OS feels cheap to me.