Mattie Num Nums
macrumors 68030
Samsung - "The Tablet No One Will Stand In Line For."
Kudos to Samsung owners for having jobs or just buying online and waiting 2 days for it to arrive via UPS.
Samsung - "The Tablet No One Will Stand In Line For."
Oh, you mean like every tablet made in the last 20 years? Cool...
LOL so?
"Amateur hour is over", etc.
I recall that was quite an attention-grabber as well. Turned out quite differently.
Call me when your tablet actually sells, Samsung.
And barely two months ago, Samsung was all sunshine and roses, very apologetic. And now these crooks actually mention Apple by name in their attack ad.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/13671894/
I wouldn't trust this insanely corrupt organization as far as I could throw them.
Oh, you mean like every tablet made in the last 20 years? Cool...
I guess Samsung doesn't care about trademark infringement (using Apple name in its advertising) either
I've been meaning to put this together for a while.
I don't know if some of you were born yesterday or if you're just posting like it, but in case you missed the last 20 years of tablets, here's what they looked like BEFORE the iPad hit the market:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Now. Apple comes out with this:
Image
And suddenly, all tablets look like this:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Etc...
I've been meaning to put this together for a while.
If people have cellphones and camera's its not closed.In a closed forum, to a closed audience that someone posted. See the difference?
You keep losing track of a thread in which you are participating. The comparison under discussion was this Samsung print ad, the Samsung "iPhone buyers in line" ad, and the Mac vs PC ads. Then divinox brought up The Lemmings from 1985.Not talking about what? I don't understand what point you are trying to make here
Wait, are you arguing that the individuals recognizing metaphors in commercials aren't thinking, or the people NOT recognizing such aren't thinking?
Oh, and if you are arguing that the Mac vs PC commercials gave anyone their user identity....I weep for those people. I was already on one side of this fence by 1990. And I wasn't in either college or business, yet.
I'm still confused as to which of those vehicles is hip. Or "college". Or "business". Car metaphors are always so poor at MR.
I've been meaning to put this together for a while.
I don't know if some of you were born yesterday or if you're just posting like it, but in case you were one of the many who said tablets were a fad and would never catch on, here's what the tablets on the market looked like BEFORE the iPad:
<snip>
quoting the entire full-length post
Kudos to Samsung owners for having jobs or just buying online and waiting 2 days for it to arrive via UPS.
I tend to ignore easily swayed people irl. Or correct them. And spend plenty of time teaching my kids to not be swayed by commercials, either.People that do think should notice that the metaphor serves more than one purpose. The effect, as such, probably works just as much on the subconscious level (commercials usually do).
I'm arguing that the metaphor has that (intended) effect. Apple products are cool and hip. PC products are not. If you want to be hip, which one should you use? (101 trick: associate a desirable trait with a certain product and/or brand).
All you've done there is prove that you know nothing whatsoever about the tablet industry, conveniently picking crummy looking tablets and leaving out all those that Apple (and others) used as inspiration.
Apple iPad:
The tablet Samsung ripped off.
Stay classy, Samsung.![]()
Im going to ask a rhetorical question since I am sure you wont answer. But what did Samsung copy again?
You keep losing track of a thread in which you are participating. The comparison under discussion was this Samsung print ad, the Samsung "iPhone buyers in line" ad, and the Mac vs PC ads. Then divinox brought up The Lemmings from 1985.
Pretty different world then. But we can talk about that, too. Just not sure it will have much relevance.
The problem is semantics. You are using "copy" in a different way.Im going to ask a rhetorical question since I am sure you wont answer. But what did Samsung copy again?
Im going to ask a rhetorical question since I am sure you wont answer. But what did Samsung copy again?