Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are these advertisements or recaps of an Appel event? Are you really unable to tell the difference? Really?

I thought they were only available to a "closed audience"? All of the keynotes contain promotional material and are available to the general public.
 
I'm glad for Samsung that they are trying to move on but this is poor advertising. Come on Samsung, you don't need to put Apple into your advertising by saying this is "the Tablet Apple tried to stop", it doesn't make good for advertising. Discounting another company's name is only disparagement. At least in Apple's Get a Mac ads they didn't use Microsoft's name.

If you have to directly reference the competition in your ads, you've already failed. I see it all the time in ads for such companies as Burger King, T-Mobile, and whomever is attacking Subway this week. The companies that are on top don't do this, only the also-rans. If you're product can't stand on its own merits, then I guess you resort to these tactics.

I agree with the referencing. It just makes their marketing effort seem desperate at this point.
Probably were more, but here's a sampling.....Guys, this ad does not denigrate Apple. It actually puts Apple in the light of a known, superior position which Samsung is trying to catch. Not sure that's a good idea for Samsung, I guess we'll see.


You are mixing up Germany and Australia. These are two different countries.
WHAT!?! I'm pretty sure anything farther than where I work is just "another place", all the same.
 
Great sarcasm.
Speaking as a long time Apple user / enthusiast / shareholder & technologist, there's no substitue for a full understanding of what's happening with the competitors. It's Apples blind followers that are the ones to be caught out. What goes up must come down.

Should Apple decide to invest all of their resources & expertise on innovation and moving forward, they will enjoy even greater success.

Conversely, if they insist on driving while looking in the rearview mirror with a jaundiced eye, the only one they're hurting is themselves.

I know, I know, the truth hurts...
 
I wasn't sure before, but now i'm definitely buying Samsung Tab.

----------

Speaking as a long time Apple user / enthusiast / shareholder & technologist, there's no substitue for a full understanding of what's happening with the competitors. It's Apples blind followers that are the ones to be caught out. What goes up must come down.

Should Apple decide to invest all of their resources & expertise on innovation and moving forward, they will enjoy even greater success.

Conversely, if they insist on driving while looking in the rearview mirror with a jaundiced eye, the only one they're hurting is themselves.

I know, I know, the truth hurts...

The bright side is that you are wrong.
 
Please explain to me how that Samsung print add attacked users?

Apple mocked an enormous user base buy portraying PC(Windows) users as nerdy bufoons while mac users were smooth talking hipsters...
I believe you guys were discussing several of Samsung's ads all at once. This ad referenced in this story does not attack users, but the one making fun of people who stand in line for phones does. (which those people probably deserve)

Mac vs PC ads were about hardware. It was a metaphor, you seriously don't see that? Maybe you should watch them again, esp the ones that DID have users in them. The users were always treated well by the ads.
 
This is utter nonsense. The ads were pure anthropomorphism, and VERY light handed.

Quick evidence gathered from watching the ads:

* Human beings don't have a power cord to trip over
* Human beings don't need ram upgrades to run vista
* HUMAN BEINGS DON'T CRASH AND STOP TALKING SUDDENLY WHILE THEY REBOOT.

If you feel the ads IMPLIED that PC users were bufoons, well, you may be kind of sensitive in that area.

cuz the "PC" being a bumbling dork didn't have anything to do with the mocking...
 
This is utter nonsense. The ads were pure anthropomorphism, and VERY light handed.

Quick evidence gathered from watching the ads:

* Human beings don't have a power cord to trip over
* Human beings don't need ram upgrades to run vista
* HUMAN BEINGS DON'T CRASH AND STOP TALKING SUDDENLY WHILE THEY REBOOT.

If you feel the ads IMPLIED that PC users were bufoons, well, you may be kind of sensitive in that area.

You don't suppose there was a reason they chose those specific representations of each?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
people here still think that making a rectangular tablet with a screen that is of a different aspect ratio and dimensions with a different os and camera and speaker layout is a straight copy of the ipad huh?

For starters, I have not said a "straight copy". Using a different camera and relocating speakers that are hidden from the front view anyway, does not make a "unique" design. That is like creative plagiarism, where people change the copied work of others by moving sentences around and changing some of the words. But it is still stealing another's ideas, even when an weak attempt is made to make it look different. But if that is the limit of your ability to see the similarities of Samsung's product, then that is fine. But Apple's charge has been substantiated by more than one court, so it certainly has merit. And Samsung has made changes to the product as a result, merit proved again. There are plenty of touch-interface, rectangular shaped, glass faced tablets that have not had this legal problem with Apple. So the unique similarities of Samsung's product standout as being more substantial than your claims of it being different.
 
Last edited:
This is like someone breaking into your house and stealing your TV. Then when they try to fence it and you complain, they put up a cardboard sign that says, "This is the TV that the original owner, "your name", did not want you to have."

It's really wrong on so many levels. :rolleyes:
BAD Samsung.
 
The bright side is that you are wrong.
Thanks for the laugh.

It's not about right or wrong, it's about free expression of ones thoughts, opinions & experience. This is a _forum_ of public opinion, for the purpose of discussion.

In _this_ format, there is no right or wrong :)
 
This is why the Apple community is frustating.

"PC vs. MAC ads are so clever" only because they benifit Apple.

"Samsung ads are dumb and tastless" only because it markets against apple.

No matter how you swing it Samsung is the underdog in the market. Just because they are trying to market out their product at the benifit of a failed lawsuit doesn't mean it's bad.

The paid is not the first tablet, it's the first to make it popular. To say that ever company is copying the ipad is a cop out. How else would you design a tablet.

I have an iphone, a macbook pro and still found this ad amusing.

This. Exactly what I was going to say. You only have to look at the PC vs Mac ads to see why its wrong to say that Apple has never done such a thing. For those who are saying that the ads were only comparing hardware, you're wrong. Look at this and this and this and this
I can go on for quite a while. It's clear the ads are referring to Microsoft Windows
 
Last edited:
Wow. PC is a category of products usually referred to non-Apple personal computers.
Never in the history, Apple has taken aim on competitors directly in ad campaigns.


I'm not so sure... Apple has poked fun at IBM in ads when they first entered the PC market...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

GreyStreet said:
This is utter nonsense. The ads were pure anthropomorphism, and VERY light handed.

Quick evidence gathered from watching the ads:

* Human beings don't have a power cord to trip over
* Human beings don't need ram upgrades to run vista
* HUMAN BEINGS DON'T CRASH AND STOP TALKING SUDDENLY WHILE THEY REBOOT.

If you feel the ads IMPLIED that PC users were bufoons, well, you may be kind of sensitive in that area.

You don't suppose there was a reason they chose those specific representations of each?

Can't you see they picked a businessman for the PC and a college student for the Mac? You could have exactly the same commercial for Homda civic vs Ford Trucks.

GET OVER IT
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the laugh.

It's not about right or wrong, it's about free expression of ones thoughts, opinions & experience. This is a _forum_ of public opinion, for the purpose of discussion.

In _this_ format, there is no right or wrong :)

You are welcome.
 
This. Exactly what I was going to say. You only have to look at the PC vs Mac ads to see why its wrong to say that Apple has never done such a thing. For those who are saying that the ads were only comparing hardware, you're wrong. Look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxOIebkmrqs
There are others as well.

Really? You are correct, though. I should have said software. Though some do reference hardware issues.

Still not users.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)



Can't you see they picked a businessman for the PC and a college student for the Mac? You could have exactly the same commercial for Homda civic vs Ford Trucks.

GET OVER IT

Oh I'm over it, I think the old Mac vs PC ads are hilarious personally. But saying that Apple has never mocked users is incorrect.

I think the Samsung ad mocking the iPhone line was funny too. As did my iPhone using friends. Stereotypes can be funny both ways.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is by far the lamest "battle" in the tech word today.
Apple tries to ban a low quality copy of the iPad that poses no real threat to it, it gets banned but the ban is lifted, and now it's time to break Apple's world-domination… but that won't happen since no one wants this tablet so who cares?
 
I don't really care about this ad from Samsung.

But I find it quite sad that a company that was founded in 1938 and has been selling electronics globally since the 1960's is not already a household name. Surely everyone has heard of Samsung by now...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Hustler1337 said:
jfjj said:
This is why the Apple community is frustating.

"PC vs. MAC ads are so clever" only because they benifit Apple.

"Samsung ads are dumb and tastless" only because it markets against apple.

No matter how you swing it Samsung is the underdog in the market. Just because they are trying to market out their product at the benifit of a failed lawsuit doesn't mean it's bad.

The paid is not the first tablet, it's the first to make it popular. To say that ever company is copying the ipad is a cop out. How else would you design a tablet.

I have an iphone, a macbook pro and still found this ad amusing.

This. Exactly what I was going to say. You only have to look at the PC vs Mac ads to see why its wrong to say that Apple has never done such a thing. For those who are saying that the ads were only comparing hardware, you're wrong. Look at this and this and this and this
I can go on for quite a while. It's clear the ads are referring to Microsoft Windows

So, no one said I had a problem with Samsungs ad.

I never said the Mac ads were just about hardware. Most of them were about how awful Vista was. Are you going to actually DEFEND early iterations of Vista??

Base on the video you posted, I can only imagine that you have a person standing next to you right now asking I its ok to read my response to your nonsense.

Tell him it's ok, an realize, the ads are about which person (person being the a tonge in cheek anthropomorphic representation of two different computers) would you rather spend your free time with?


Edit: lol, nice edit bro
 
Can't you see they picked a businessman for the PC and a college student for the Mac? You could have exactly the same commercial for Homda civic vs Ford Trucks.

GET OVER IT

Wait, which vehicle is the student? Cause I don't see "rusty 1992 Camry" listed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"At the end of the day the media awareness certainly made the Galaxy Tab 10.1 a household name compared to probably what it would've been based on the investment that we would've put into it from a marketing perspective," [Samsung Australia vice president of telecommunications Tyler McGee] said.

Asked how many units of the Galaxy Tab Samsung was bringing in, McGee said "as many units as we can" but warned "there will probably be short supply against the demand".
--------

So did they sell all 20 units in AU then? :D

Seriously though, I don't understand this fight to the death on Samsung's part for a device that hasn't generated a whole lot of consumer interest... or sales.

In the states, Stores have more than enough Galaxy Tabs (ok, probably too many on shelves), and I haven't been able to find a single article in AU news that shows people storming the malls for a Galaxy Tab now that they can.

I don't think Samsung will ever recover their legal expenses from sales of this device... really, what they are spending in this legal battle with Apple has to be exceeding any profits made... never mind that they had to redesign, redistribute, and probably pay fines or royalties later on down the line in a few countries.

I know they say no publicity is bad publicity, but sheesh... "OH, you got that copy cat iPad for Christmas did ya?"
 
I still don't know a single person that owns a Galaxy tab.

Is that because you hang out in lines @ Apple Stores :D

Just kidding, I don't know any either to be honest. And if I were to buy a tablet it'd be between the new Transformer and an iPad...might wait till W8 tablets come out to compare though. No matter what I get it will just be taken over by my two year old wanting to watch toons anyways...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.