Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
ROFLCOPTERZ!!! So they tried an attempt at doing something Animoji like but instead it seems creepy, and this is basically another S8 with very very minor petty upgrades, and should I mention what also looks to be a bit fatter than the original S8. I think I have a bit more excitement waiting to see the X Plus than this thing, and that Lily purple color or whatever their calling it is also pretty bad but I guess if you're female that will probably be your thing.
 
Because my experience with a brand new Galaxy phone has been nothing but terrible (work given phone mind you). The speed of the OS slows down to a crawl after a few days of usage. Not to mention doing anything is beyond not intuitive.

After a few months of using it, I "forced" my HR & Supply Chain depts to give me an iPhone instead as doing any work on that piece of garbage was maddening.
I have never had this experience. I had an S8+ and currently have a Note 8 and 3 S7 Edge phones. None of them have slowed down to this day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dan Holmstock
But ask yourself how many consumers actually upgrade on an annual basis? I would say not many, especially given the rising costs of smart phones, I would say most consumers likely retain their current smart phone for at least two, maybe three years before they upgrade again. Hardware refinements for smart phones are not drastically different every single year, they’re typically minor. More specifically, the camera is upgraded and a few physical enhancements. But again, it’s the software experience that immerses the user more than the hardware. It’s the software experience that retains the consumer, which is a clear example why iOS has such a strong following.
I agree with you. How long can these companies keep raising the price of their phones before their profits start to drop?
 
A huge waste of code dedicated toward adults acting like children. :apple:

I'm honestly wondering if phones are being aimed at younger and younger audiences. Animoji and stickers and Mickey Mouse...who are these phones for? I'm 19 and I already feel too old for Apple's marketing. They might as well include candy and arcade tickets with every iPhone purchase.
 
But ask yourself how many consumers actually upgrade on an annual basis? I would say not many, especially given the rising costs of smart phones, I would say most consumers likely retain their current smart phone for at least two, maybe three years before they upgrade again. Hardware refinements for smart phones are not drastically different every single year, they’re typically minor. More specifically, the camera is upgraded and a few physical enhancements. But again, it’s the software experience that immerses the user more than the hardware. It’s the software experience that retains the consumer, which is a clear example why iOS has such a strong following.
Is it that the year over year hardware improvements are not drastically different that keeps people from upgrading? Or that the hardware upgrades are not that important? I would argue more towards the latter than the former. Smartphones are plenty fast for the tasks that a lot of users need them to do.
 
Why are you using unofficial images that dont look anything like the gs9 and gs9+ and make the phone look like it has side bezzels?

The Galaxy S8 and S9 do have side bezels.

But 99% of the time you will be distracted by the reflection of the light in the room from the curved class. :p

Sl1pcTn.jpg
 
Well note 8 remains the phone to keep until a new note or foldable note becomes available this upcoming Fall..........I am staying a way from the S series since I prefer the s pen on my mobile devices. Good job Samsung and you can reclaim your display glory once again as usual and the plethora of features your phones already had for the most part. AR emojis was to satisfy the Apple Animoji squad lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas
Is it that the year over year hardware improvements are not drastically different that keeps people from upgrading? Or that the hardware upgrades are not that important? I would argue more towards the latter than the former. Smartphones are plenty fast for the tasks that a lot of users need them to do.

I Really don’t think speed with processor improvements is a selling point for the average consumer when considering to upgrade or if there smart phone is “Fast enough.” Again, camera upgrades, features like 3D Touch, etc. are the type of features that might be more interesting. The Mitigating factors is the price point, does the average consumer feel compelled enough to upgrade from the previous device to the newest device annually? Likely not. But as I said in a previous post, long-term, it’s the software improvements that need to build the user experience, as hardware is superficial or more of an general attraction.
 
Because my experience with a brand new Galaxy phone has been nothing but terrible (work given phone mind you). The speed of the OS slows down to a crawl after a few days of usage. Not to mention doing anything is beyond not intuitive.

After a few months of using it, I "forced" my HR & Supply Chain depts to give me an iPhone instead as doing any work on that piece of garbage was maddening.

Hehe...doing work on a smartphone! Give me a break.
 
So their largest aperture has increased a tiny bit over what’s available elsewhere.
I've got bad news for Samsung - hardware based bokeh only comes with massively larger sensors and lenses.

Unless you want a lens at least as large as a couple of Oreos, computational photography is the only way to go.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.