That's probably true also but I think the point is that it's not even close to an issue and 95% of people (not an actual statistic) forget about the notch 100% of the time. It's honestly never crossed my mind once after the first 2 weeks since owning it.Or, rather, we've updated and innovated so fast that it will be stagnant for a while.
What is it with the incessant desire for bezel less smartphones?[doublepost=1519597712][/doublepost]
Oh look. They kept the ugly bezels.
[doublepost=1519597755][/doublepost]
No, it still has ugly bezels for 2012. Nothing edgelss about this.
Well, when you start from a great baseline you don't have toIt feels like they didn’t even try this year.
Those were Apple fans complaining about Apple design. Maybe they wanted a significant change. The Samsung users may not be as bothered by iterative design.
No one liked touchscreen phones before 2007. Using your logic, no one should have bought the original iPhone, and we should all still be using phones with physical buttons.
I tried to explain the same thing to my parents and relatives. I came to the conclusion that people are stuck in the past and therefore we cannot evolve as a society. People aren't openminded, never have been.Headphone jack? You must still be complaining when they got rid of VHS tapes as well. How about floppy disks?
Using your face weather it be 2d 3d or 50d makes zero difference of who had it first.
Looking at you phone to unlock using your face was done first on a samsung phone.
Period.
Facial recognition is facial recognition!!
that is not apples technology.someone else created itloved how they had to keep dissing apple but they copy Animoji, such a lame update from Samsung
FaceID is not a must have. The only people who care about FaceID are those justifying the iPhone XFace-ID too tough for you, Samsung?
Face ID isn't secure either so it's no better than Android face unlock that came before. For single factor authentication iris > fingerprint > face but best is multi-factor authentication with combination of iris + fingerprint.
A huge waste of code dedicated toward adults acting like children.![]()
FaceID is not a must have. The only people who care about FaceID are those justifying the iPhone X
Yea cause someone being able to unlock a phone with a picture and it working is totally the same thing
Sorry if multiple people answer you but I haven't worked my way through the thread yet and am on the road and could lose my connection. You can do something very similar with Google Translate. It's on the app store and is a free download. You can select the option to use your camera with the app.Samsung has come a long way nice phone, I won't give up my X for it though.
Just curious does iPhone do that thing with the camera where you take a picture of a foreign language and convert it, I like that feature.
Samsung on Sunday unveiled its latest Galaxy S9 and S9+ flagship smartphones at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, showcasing the handset's new dual-lens camera, stereo speakers, and AR-powered emoji. The new smartphones take the same general design as the Galaxy S8 devices, with slightly slimmer bezels on the top and bottom.
The headline feature of the S9 and S9+ is a 12-megapixel dual lens camera, boasting the first variable aperture system built into a smartphone, which promises better results in low light conditions and hardware-based shallow depth of field effects. Samsung's new photography computation also shoots 12 photos in three groups of four and then combines them at the pixel level to eliminate noise and boost detail.
![]()
The S9 features variable dual lens 12-megapixel cameras with dual optical image stabilization, while the S9+ features a variable aperture lens paired with a second 12-megapixel lens with a fixed aperture. The S9 Plus also includes a new slow-motion mode that can shoot at 960 frames per second, which can turn a 2-millisecond recording into six seconds of video. For comparison's sake, Apple's iPhone X shoots at a maximum of 240 frames per second.
In U.S. models, the S9 is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 845 processor, but in other regions, including Europe, the smartphone is powered by Samsung's own Exynos chip. Samsung has combined the face and iris recognition features into a new system called Intelligent Scan, which uses the best biometric sensor for the given situation. The fingerprint scanner on the back now sits below the camera module rather than alongside it. Like the S8 devices, the displays on the 5.8-inch and 6.2-inch models are Quad HD+ and Super AMOLED, respectively. Also, there's a headphone jack.
The inevitable comparison of Samsung's new AR-based emoji will be Animoji on iPhone X, which map users' facial expressions onto cartoon facades using Apple's TrueDepth camera technology. However the Galaxy S9 diverges here by creating 3D personalized characters more akin to Bitmoji or Nintendo Mii avatars, which can then be shared as GIFs.
The S9 comes with 4GB of RAM while the S9+ has 6GB of memory. Both versions come with a base 64GB storage (user expandable up to 400GB via the Micro SD slot). In the U.S., the S9 starts at $720, with the S9+ costing $840. Pre-orders for both models begin on March 2 and the phones start shipping on March 16.
Article Link: Samsung Unveils Galaxy S9 Series Smartphones With Dual Lens Variable Aperture Camera and AR Emoji
I owned Galaxies and iPhones over the years. Gimmicks aren't exclusive to Samsung though. I never used Apple's gimmicky animojis once when I had the X. FaceID isn't as reliable as Touch ID for me. I think Facial Recognition should be able to look at your face without the screen on and unlock. Not screen on, swipe, then unlock.
Thanks, Paul ThurrotFaceID is not a must have. The only people who care about FaceID are those justifying the iPhone X
Brothers and sisters that like barely alike have unlocked faceid.
The new gs9 uses face I'd along with iris now to make it more secure and also added skin tone
How is removing the headphone jack an evolution?I tried to explain the same thing to my parents and relatives. I came to the conclusion that people are stuck in the past and therefore we cannot evolve as a society. People aren't openminded, never have been.
Ouch, you really stuck it to me. Got anything of substance instead of ad homs?Thanks, Paul Thurrot