Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's funny how some think Samsung is not innovative but yet forget that they already had working samples of 10nm ahead of Intel.

Qualcomm is using Samsung's second gen 14nm fab for its up coming snapdragon and ditched tsmc.

To bad the a9 is on its first gen fab as Samsung is on max capacity making exynos 8890 and snapdragon 800
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAverigeUser
I don't need a link since about 90% of Samsung's lineup is made by crappy phones and they sold most of their numbers in the sub $400 class (where they are even more crappy).

poor quality in an iPhone display ? You clearly don't know what you are speaking about... :rolleyes:
I found much more embarrassing to put a ridiculous quantity of pixels in a Pentile matrix just as a bait for specs drooling customers....


You clearly have no idea of what you are talking about…

The "under 400 USD class" is less about smartphone quality, it is more about customers being able to do their maths and being able to make intelligent decisions because they have full immunity against marketing-propaganda-machines and brainwashing advertisement. These class of customers don´t let themselves easily take for fools, you know… Guess what enterprise I am talking about?

As for the "over 400 USD class" : Apple gives you not just one, but two products:

1) an "under 400 USD smartphone" (= product #1)
and
2) apple adds its all-time most selling product, which is called: "iMAGINATION" (= product #2)

Product #1 and product #2 are only sold as a bundle!

and - just because you are a really exceptional smart guy - they offer you a very special deal:
both (product #1 and product # 2 in a bundle) for just 999 USD together !!! You want even a second bundle because its so much worth the price? ok, because it´s you…. :D

…….

perhaps they gave you even 2 packs of "iMAGINATION" for the price of a single one ?
[doublepost=1454367581][/doublepost]by the way…

if there was someone who "invented the personal computer", then this was NOT "APPLE" AT ALL - it was Steve Wozniak.

(but Wozniak was fascinated by Microsoft/IBM, so he did not invent the personal computer, he refined it a lot - a very important evolution)

The only thing Steve Jobs really did was marketing/selling. He was a extremely talented businessman.

And Steve Jobs way to "share" With the INVENTOR Wozniak was telling him to share the profits for the first deal they did like brothers do: 50/50.

In reality, he was lying about the amount of money they made and "sharing" meant 8% for Wozniak and 92% for Jobs….
 
Last edited:
You clearly have no idea of what you are talking about…

The "under 400 USD class" is less about smartphone quality, it is more about customers being able to do their maths and being able to make intelligent decisions because they have full immunity against marketing-propaganda-machines and brainwashing advertisement. These class of customers don´t let themselves easily take for fools, you know… Guess what enterprise I am talking about?

As for the "over 400 USD class" : Apple gives you not just one, but two products:

1) an "under 400 USD smartphone" (= product #1)
and
2) apple adds its all-time most selling product, which is called: "iMAGINATION" (= product #2)

Product #1 and product #2 are only sold as a bundle!

and - just because you are a really exceptional smart guy - they offer you a very special deal:
both (product #1 and product # 2 in a bundle) for just 999 USD together !!! You want even a second bundle because its so much worth the price? ok, because it´s you…. :D

…….

perhaps they gave you even 2 packs of "iMAGINATION" for the price of a single one ?
[doublepost=1454367581][/doublepost]by the way…

if it was someone who "invented the personal computer", then this was NOT "APPLE" AT ALL - it was Steve Wozniak.

The only thing Steve Jobs really did was marketing/selling. He was a extremely talented businessman.

And Steve Jobs way to "share" With the INVENTOR Wozniak was telling him to share the profits for the first deal they did like brothers.

In reality, he was lying about the amount of money these made and "sharing" meant 8% for Wozniak and 92% for Jobs….
don't you like an iPhone / can't afford it ? Easy solution: buy something else.
In my opinion the iPhone is just THE BEST, by far, smartphone on the market.
Not "among the bests". THE BEST. No contest.

Brainwash advertising ? The company trying hard to be Apple is Samsung.
I don't even watch Apple ads.
I just go in an Apple Store and try their products before buy.

Samsung ? They have a very special ability. They are talented in ruin a good specs list with a uninspiring , incoherent, unpolished realization.
It's far from an intelligent decision to buy one of their bloated devices.
My opinion. I'm entitled to have one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245
don't you like an iPhone / can't afford it ? Easy solution: buy something else.
In my opinion the iPhone is just THE BEST, by far, smartphone on the market.
Not "among the bests". THE BEST. No contest.

Samsung ? They have a very special ability. They are talented in ruin a good specs list with a uninspiring , incoherent, unpolished realization.
My opinion. I'm entitled to have one.


OMG - you are even unable to read my signature?

get rid of your overdosed iMagination!

I own 2 MBP 15" upgraded at max, 1 MacPro 8-core, upgraded at max, 2xiP 5, iPad retina, ipad mini2, ipod touch, …
What a primitive way to offend someone by claiming the other one criticizes only because he "is unable to afford the product - but I do!" … this level of insulting "discussion" that you are "performing" here is just shocking.

Last time someone tried to talk me like that was in the sandbox… a little boy, many decades ago…
must I now be also afraid of you because you have also a "very strong older brother"? *LOL*
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dave.UK and cfedu
OMG - you are even unable to read my signature?
What primitive way to offend someone by claiming the other one criticizes only because he "is unable to afford the product" … this level of "discussion" of your part is more level of adolescent boys in school court...
it was just AN OPTION: you don't like it / you can afford it.
Choose whatever fits you.
I don't know you nor your income. And I don't care.

It's FAR more offensive your allusion to people making "intelligent choices" not buying an iPhone.
 
Last edited:
it was just AN OPTION: you don't like it / you can afford it.
Choose whatever fits you.
I don't know you nor your income. And I don't care.

It's FAR more offensive your allusion to people making "intelligent choices" not buying an iPhone.


Ahh - you are trying to slide sideways… Your offense ("You are just poor and jealous and I am rich and can afford") is more than evident.
But I can tell you: You shot yourself in the foot.

I do not want to waste my time any more. Byebye.
 
75m forked over their hard earned cash last quarter. Why do you think that is?
It's quite simple, they spent the money because they're insecure, vain, and programmed to believe expensive possessions will raise their standing amongst their peers. At least that's the profile of millions of people in the USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAverigeUser
It's quite simple, they spent the money because they're insecure, vain, and programmed to believe expensive possessions will raise their standing amongst their peers. At least that's the profile of millions of people in the USA.
You really think that is the case from the bottom of your heart?
 
Each time we return to the obvious: both Apple and Samsung make smartphones of superior quality and are both making money hand over fist.

What's not to like?
 
Ahh - you are trying to slide sideways… Your offense ("You are just poor and jealous and I am rich and can afford") is more than evident.
But I can tell you: You shot yourself in the foot.

I do not want to waste my time any more. Byebye.
You questioned my (and some hundred millions others ' ) intelligence with your post.
I just questioned your annual income, that as a matter of fact I don't know / don't care.
The option was clear: you don't LIKE IT / you can't afford it.
I can't know your motivations.

But you clearly questioned intelligence of Apple 's users.

Do you work for Apple or are you just a Macrumors member? :D
I surely don't work for Apple nor I am a shareholder by any means.
 
don't you like an iPhone / can't afford it ? Easy solution: buy something else.
In my opinion the iPhone is just THE BEST, by far, smartphone on the market.
Not "among the bests". THE BEST. No contest.

Brainwash advertising ? The company trying hard to be Apple is Samsung.
I don't even watch Apple ads.
I just go in an Apple Store and try their products before buy.

Samsung ? They have a very special ability. They are talented in ruin a good specs list with a uninspiring , incoherent, unpolished realization.
It's far from an intelligent decision to buy one of their bloated devices.
My opinion. I'm entitled to have one.
That you are sir. . You are of course 100% wrong, but that's cool ..
 
What a way.of Sidestepping the comment, in 2015 putting out a device with 720p is.embarrassing, such a poor quality.screen.. why? Because they know the crowd.will lap.it up no matter what so they prey on the loyalty. . Corporate greed at.its.worst, whereas samsung continually. Pushes. The boundaries of new technologies. And.cutting else specs.. why, so they release. Things at the limit of technology, screwing the bottom line in the process. . You can get.720p.screens.in 100.dollar.handsets.. and folk still.defend apple profit margins.. jeez...
You're right of course. Thankfully my 6s has a top quality screen that doesn't over-saturate.
[doublepost=1454423757][/doublepost]
When your handsets are 2014 Specs. But sold at 2016 prices sure you will make more profit.
Is that why the 6s trounced the competition in benchmarks?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max(IT)
You're right of course. Thankfully my 6s has a top quality screen that doesn't over-saturate.
[doublepost=1454423757][/doublepost]
Is that why the 6s trounced the competition in benchmarks?
The fabled benchmarks that only mean anything when apple is on top.. those benchmarks...
[doublepost=1454431310][/doublepost]
You're right of course. Thankfully my 6s has a top quality screen that doesn't over-saturate.?
Top quality, ha ha ha, the level of blinkered view here is off the chart, if you said it was low resolution, pale washed out colours, then you would be nearer to the mark.. I genuinely feel sorry for you brother, that you have to put up with the sub standard offerings supplied by Apple. .
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAverigeUser
In my opinion the iPhone is just THE BEST, by far, smartphone on the market.
Not "among the bests". THE BEST. No contest.

That's your opinion but fact is iPhones are comparable to mid range Android devices. If you want SAMOLED, precision pen, etc. like the Note 5 you're going to have to wait until 2018.
 
The fabled benchmarks that only mean anything when apple is on top.. those benchmarks...
[doublepost=1454431310][/doublepost]
Top quality, ha ha ha, the level of blinkered view here is off the chart, if you said it was low resolution, pale washed out colours, then you would be nearer to the mark.. I genuinely feel sorry for you brother, that you have to put up with the sub standard offerings supplied by Apple. .

Nope. EVERY benchmark.

pale washed out colors ? You clearly don't know what are you speaking about.
I genuinely feel sorry for you, that don't understand anything about displays....

78214.png

78216.png

78217.png

If you’re using an iPhone 6s or 6s Plus for any remotely color-critical work like viewing and/or editing photos and videos, it’s a pretty fair bet that you’ll be able to rely on these phones to provide an accurate color reproduction in pretty much any condition. Samsung does provide better contrast and the possibility of extra color saturation with their Galaxy S6 and Note 5, but this comes at the cost of potential for burn-in, increased power consumption in certain scenarios, and increased distortion with changes in viewing angles.

That's your opinion but fact is iPhones are comparable to mid range Android devices. If you want SAMOLED, precision pen, etc. like the Note 5 you're going to have to wait until 2018.

sorry dude, nice attempt.
According to my sources the Note 5 is inferior in any aspect.
It's not my opinion. It's a matter of fact.

78180.png

78192.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
The fabled benchmarks that only mean anything when apple is on top.. those benchmarks...
[doublepost=1454431310][/doublepost]
Top quality, ha ha ha, the level of blinkered view here is off the chart, if you said it was low resolution, pale washed out colours, then you would be nearer to the mark.. I genuinely feel sorry for you brother, that you have to put up with the sub standard offerings supplied by Apple. .
Sorry you feel sorry for me; I'll survive with a sub standard offering. At least this substandard offering screen displays true color with subtle gradations. So
And once again you post results where the s6 Edge.plus.is ommitted, cropped the page again have we. . You are acting a bit foolish now my friend, let it go. ..
in the words of a very smart person: "let it go". Point proved. The s6 edge is essentially the same phone, but not only that the graph is cropped from the bottom not the top if anything...so let's not discuss people's acting abilities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max(IT)
Sorry you feel sorry for me; I'll survive with a sub standard offering. At least this substandard offering screen displays true color with subtle gradations.
Subtle gradients on a Lcd panel, behave yourself. . Contrast ratios of 1000 To 1.. pants.. the super amoled are about 1000000 to 1, blacker blacks and whiter whites.. That's what you call subtle gradients. Now will you stop bothering me now son, I've proved my point, I'm bored. Amen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAverigeUser
Subtle gradients on a Lcd panel, behave yourself. . Contrast ratios of 1000 To 1.. pants.. the super amoled are about 1000000 to 1, blacker blacks and whiter whites.. That's what you call subtle gradients. Now will you stop bothering me now son, I've proved my point, I'm bored. Amen.
I'm bored with the unfounded hype. The benchmarks tell another story. The s6 cpu is so last year compared to the a9. Now go do your reading and come back with some real info.
 
And once again you post results where the s6 Edge.plus.is ommitted, cropped the page again have we. . You are acting a bit foolish now my friend, let it go. ..
Oh my dear you're embarrassing yourself...
I posted tests from two different well known websites where every Samsung phone was demonstrated as inferior to an iPhone and now you are looking for the s6 edge plus.
What's next ? The s6 edge plus ultra mega ?
The s6 is an inferior product compared to an iPhone 6s . Deal with it.

Subtle gradients on a Lcd panel, behave yourself. . Contrast ratios of 1000 To 1.. pants.. the super amoled are about 1000000 to 1, blacker blacks and whiter whites.. That's what you call subtle gradients. Now will you stop bothering me now son, I've proved my point, I'm bored. Amen.
Now the point is contrast ratio and color precision incidentally doesn't count anymore ?
Contrast ratio is cheated in amoled displays because of the blacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.