Samsung is right at one thing. It is a DULL iPhone. Splash two black options, copy HTC and Sony features from 3.5 years ago, remove headphone jack, not improve much in display, camera, and performance and call it iPhone 7/7 Plus. Worst upgrade since going from 3G to 3Gs.
It's a dull upgrade. Samsung should have slowed their roll. It's okay though. Apple still loses in several areas to Samsung including manufacturing ANYTHING THEMSELVES and real homegrown technologies. Apple still needs Samsung like they do with TSMC and Foxconn.
I don't think popularity = quality. That's like saying Justin Bieber is a better music artist than Steve Jobs' idol, Bob Dylan, because he sells more records. So iPhone 7 can outsell Note7 50:1.
Apple iPhone 7 / 7 Plus loses again to Samsung's ISOCELL. Samsung packs QHD and still surpasses phones with 1080p and 720p in battery life. Apple loses in overall design too rehashing a design from 2014 to push it for 36 months while Samsung is guilty of it for the last 18 months but can change it up six months from now.
Recall happening BEFORE the iPhone 7 is actually better for Samsung in the long run. They had time to reorganize. Imagine had the recall happened closer to the shopping season? Fireworks to light up New Year's Eve. It was a mistake by Samsung's part. They owed up it and will move on. They are not going to just roll over their belly and die on us. Sony and Toyota are still fine after their recall. Samsung is currently richer than both of them. Move on...
"Apple not having real homegrown technology..." Yeah, so I guess the main and most constantly improving feature, the A-series/Fusion series processors, is made by some Korean guy in a basement at Samsung's facilities and it's not really Apple's processor design team. Samsung's business is to maintain it's manufacturing facilities producing, not innovating the phone market. They produce a lot of stuff all over the world, not just phones, or processors, or batteries. And yes, Samsung's marketing team is trying to ride on Apple's iPhone success, that's extremely clear, and the hard reality is that they are not good at copying Apple's philosophy. That's why they commit mistakes like messing up with exploding batteries just to beat out Apple's phone announcements. Marketing is pushing them. They are trying to compete with Apple, and Apple is not trying to compete with anybody. Apple does their thing and listen to what the majority of real hardware user wants and adapt those needs to their design philosophy. Samsung thinks that what people wants is bigger screens, bigger batteries, faster processors, etc. That's it for their design team. As long as they keep doing that, they will always be second or third place when compared to iPhone.
And Apple does not "need" TSMC nor Samsung. Apple just sends out project tenders (made by their internal design and QA teams) for hardware manufacturing and all of those asian facilities send their offers for production of said hardware, or parts of it. If you really think about it, those companies NEED clients like Apple to maintain their manufacturing business going. And that's how it works right now. If Apple needed to manufacture their own stuff, they would. But options exist worldwide, and if they are a viable choice to keep costs low and profit high, well, they'd be stupid not to use said opportunities. An example of this type of options: Mexico organised their tax policies so japanese, korean, german, spaniard, dutch and american car manufacturers -and their partners- could set their facilities there and produce their vehicles for lower costs. Chances are your 2016 Honda Fit, or your Toyota Camry, and even your Porsche were not made in Japan or Germany, but in Celaya or Puebla, in Mexico. And you pay the same for a great quality japanese or german car made in Mexico. How shocking, right?
Asia created opportunities for electronics and many more manufacturing industries, so Samsung, TSMC and Foxconn flourished because they were protected by their governments against foreign competition. Otherwise, we would probably be talking about Apple Asia Semiconductors Manufacturing not putting out enough Fusion processors to cover international iPhone market demands.
Be real with your comments. It's not a "DC v. Marvel" fan situation. It's a world-wide business management matter, with two companies with very different business models being compared by many public entities as if they had the same goals to achieve.
Sorry for the rant...